“Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process

İbrahim Fırat

doi:10.25229/beta.1872121

EN TR

“Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process

Öz

This study examines the cognitive and psychological effects of digital transformation by analyzing the relationship between Industry 4.0 awareness and entrepreneurial intention, with life satisfaction as a mediator. Based on the view that digitalization represents not only a technical shift but also a socio-psychological process influencing life satisfaction and future-oriented behaviors, this study tests a model developed within an integrative theoretical framework. Data collected from university students in Türkiye were analyzed using SPSS 23 and AMOS 21. Scale validity and reliability were supported through confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling results indicated that Industry 4.0 awareness significantly increased life satisfaction (β=.201, p<.001), which in turn exerted a substantial effect on entrepreneurial intention (β=.280, p<.001). In addition, life satisfaction played a significant partial mediating role in the pathway linking Industry 4.0 awareness to entrepreneurial intention (β=.056). These findings indicate that awareness of digital technologies extends beyond cognitive perceptions and indirectly shapes entrepreneurial tendencies through individuals’ overall life satisfaction. By clarifying the interplay between technological awareness, well-being, and entrepreneurship, the study offers a new psychological perspective to the literature and highlights the need for integrated policies that simultaneously strengthen digital literacy and subjective well-being in higher education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Transformation, Industry 4.0 Awareness, Entrepreneurial Intention, Life Satisfaction

“Makineleşen Dünyada İnsan Olmak”: Girişimcilik Sürecinde Dijital Dönüşüm ile Girişimcilik Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkide Yaşam Doyumunun Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırma, dijital dönüşümün bilişsel ve psikolojik etkilerini bütüncül biçimde ele alarak, Endüstri 4.0 farkındalığı ile girişimcilik niyeti arasındaki ilişkiyi ve yaşam doyumunun aracılık rolünü incelemektedir. Dijitalleşmenin yalnızca teknik bir dönüşüm değil, aynı zamanda bireylerin yaşam memnuniyetlerini ve geleceğe dair davranışsal eğilimlerini şekillendiren sosyo-psikolojik bir süreç olduğu kabulünden hareketle, çalışmada bu ilişkileri açıklamaya yönelik bütüncül bir kuramsal çerçeve temel alınarak bir model test edilmiştir. Türkiye’deki üniversite öğrencilerinden toplanan veriler SPSS 23 ve AMOS 21 programlarıyla analiz edilmiştir. Ölçeklerin geçerlik ve güvenirliği doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle desteklenmiş; yapısal eşitlik modellemesi sonuçları, Endüstri 4.0 farkındalığının yaşam doyumunu anlamlı biçimde artırdığını (β=.201, p<.001), yaşam doyumunun girişimcilik niyeti üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve kayda değer bir yapısal etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir (β=.280, p<.001). Ayrıca, yaşam doyumunun Endüstri 4.0 farkındalığından girişimcilik niyetine uzanan süreçte anlamlı bir kısmi aracı işlev gördüğünü ortaya koymuştur (β=.056). Bu bulgular, dijital teknolojilere ilişkin farkındalığın yalnızca bilişsel algılarla sınırlı kalmadığını; bireylerin genel yaşam memnuniyeti üzerinden girişimcilik eğilimlerini dolaylı biçimde şekillendirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, teknolojik farkındalık–iyi oluş–girişimcilik üçgenini açıklayarak literatüre yeni bir psikolojik perspektif sunmakta ve yükseköğretimde dijital okuryazarlık ile öznel iyi oluşu birlikte geliştirmeye yönelik bütünleşik politikalara ihtiyaç olduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Dönüşüm, Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalığı, Girişimcilik Niyeti, Yaşam Doyumu

Kaynakça

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Aksoy, C., & Yalçınsoy, A. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimleri üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Business Research-Türk, 9(2), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2017.335
Arredondo, A., & Morales Palma, S. V. (2023). Entrepreneurial Intention, Life Satisfaction, and Impulsivity in University Students. In Entrepreneurship - New Insights [Working Title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110664
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Baron, R., Franklin, R., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2013). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress. Journal of Management, 39(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495411
Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bozkuş, N., & Fırat, İ., 2025. Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalığı, Demografik Farklılıklar ve Girişimcilik Niyeti: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Ampirik Bir İnceleme. Journal of Academic Value Studies, 11(4), 270-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/javs.87993
Buckingham, S., Tu, G., Elliott, L., Poole, R., Walker, T., Bland, E., & Morrissey, K. (2023). Digital competence and psychological wellbeing in a social housing community: a repeated survey study. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2002. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16875-2

Bullini Orlandi, L., Bottura, M., Veglianti, E., & Zardini, A. (2025). Less is more: Digital and physical sustainability shortage impact on entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21, 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01058-1
Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with AMOS Basic concepts, applications, and program¬ming (Multivariate Applications Series), Routled¬ge, New York.
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dağlı, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyum ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1250–1262. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.75955
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
Doğan, O. (2019). The conceptual awareness levels of university students on Industry 4.0 in the process of digital transformation management [Master’s thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=A-5DSxVTKVOSF6JmbGNukw&no=Bq3w3b9kU5BUP1yyqVeouQ
Doğan, O., & Baloğlu, N. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin Endüstri 4.0 kavramsal farkındalık düzeyleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 13(1), 126–142.
Duong, C. D. (2024). ChatGPT adoption and digital entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical research based on the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120208
Duong, C. D. (2025). AI literacy and e-entrepreneurial intention: A serial mediation model of e-entrepreneurial self-efficacy and e-entrepreneurial identity aspiration. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(2), 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100349
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Pearson.
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869
Güven, B., Belber, B. G., & Dinç, L. (2024). The relationship and interactions among digital literacy, innovativeness and entrepreneurial inclinations: A study on university students. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management - JEIM, 13(2), 122–146.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Imjai, N., Nui-Suk, C., Usman, B., Somwethee, P., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2024). The influence of AI competency and design thinking skills on innovative entrepreneurial competency: The role of strategic intelligence amongst new age entrepreneurs in Thailand. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4, 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100301
Kagermann, H. (2015). Change through digitization—Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In H. Albach, H. Meffert, A. Pinkwart, & R. Reichwald (Eds.), Management of permanent change (pp. 23–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_2
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. German National Academy of Science and Engineering.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Lee, H. (2024). Analysis of the impact of digital literacy on life satisfaction (2019–2022) for older adults in South Korea: a national community-based panel study. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 20399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71397-0
Linan, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x
Linan, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Onwubuya, U. N., & Odogwu, I. C. (2023). Digital literacy and entrepreneurial intentions of business education students in tertiary institutions. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research, 9(6), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijssmr.v9.no6.2023.pg101.112
Örücü, E., Kılıç, R., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimlerinde ailesel faktörlerin etkisi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 2(2), 27–47.
Özsarı, A., & Görücü, A. (2023). Digital Literacy, Digital Addiction and Life Satisfaction: Study of Judo Athletes. Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns (JERP), 4(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.53016/jerp.v4i1.100
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing mediation. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolutio: What it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the Industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(10), 4035. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104035
Şencan, H. (2005). Güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Seçkin Yayınevi.
Şeşen , H., & Basım, N. H. (2012). Demografik faktörler ve kişiliğin girişimcilik niyetine etkisi: Spor bilimleri alanında öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 12, 2128.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Uy, M. A., Foo, M. D., & Song, Z. (2013). Joint effects of prior start-up experience and coping strategies on entrepreneurs’ psychological well-being. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.04.003
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Yang, Y., Nay, S., & Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Three approaches to using lengthy ordinal scales in structural equation models: Parceling, latent scoring, and shortening scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(2), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609338592
Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(Özel Sayı), 74–85.
Yılmaz, S. E., & Çelik, O. (2025). The impact of students’ Covid-19 career perception on life satisfaction: The mediating role of entrepreneurial intention. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Social Sciences Journal, 22(1), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1496720

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

İşletme , İş Sistemleri (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

İbrahim Fırat ^*
0000-0001-6102-7176
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

28 Haziran 2026

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Haziran 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Ocak 2026

Kabul Tarihi

11 Haziran 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1872121

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA49DS58WS

APA

Fırat, İ. (2026). “Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 11(2), 1375-1409. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1872121

AMA

1.Fırat İ. “Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process. beta. 2026;11(2):1375-1409. doi:10.25229/beta.1872121

Chicago

Fırat, İbrahim. 2026. “‘Being Human in a Mechanized World’: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 11 (2): 1375-1409. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1872121.

EndNote

Fırat İ (01 Haziran 2026) “Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 11 2 1375–1409.

IEEE

[1]İ. Fırat, “‘Being Human in a Mechanized World’: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process”, beta, c. 11, sy 2, ss. 1375–1409, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.25229/beta.1872121.

ISNAD

Fırat, İbrahim. “‘Being Human in a Mechanized World’: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 11/2 (01 Haziran 2026): 1375-1409. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1872121.

JAMA

1.Fırat İ. “Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process. beta. 2026;11:1375–1409.

MLA

Fırat, İbrahim. “‘Being Human in a Mechanized World’: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, c. 11, sy 2, Haziran 2026, ss. 1375-09, doi:10.25229/beta.1872121.

Vancouver

1.İbrahim Fırat. “Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process. beta. 01 Haziran 2026;11(2):1375-409. doi:10.25229/beta.1872121

Bu dergide yayımlanan eserler Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmaktadır.

“Being Human in a Mechanized World”: The Mediating Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Entrepreneurial Process

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

“Makineleşen Dünyada İnsan Olmak”: Girişimcilik Sürecinde Dijital Dönüşüm ile Girişimcilik Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkide Yaşam Doyumunun Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster