Araştırma Makalesi

Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 27 Aralık 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique

Öz

This article aims to critically reassess the theoretical and methodological premises of developmental state. It is argued that developmental state as a theoretical framework is misleading in terms of grasping the nature of the state by regarding it existing above the social relations, particularly class conflicts, and separating it from the international context within which it flourished. Moreover, in an attempt to explain the inherent contradictions of the developmental state, which have largely been obscured within the statist theoretical framework, I argue that the concept of the developmental state mystifies the exploitative nature of the capitalist state on the one hand, while overlooking the contradictions intrinsic to capitalist development on the other.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Developmental state,class conflict,statism,methodological nationalism

Kaynakça

  1. Gore, C. (1996) “Methodological Nationalism and the Misunderstanding of East Asian Industrialization”, European Journal of Development Research, Vol. 8, No: 1, p. 77–122
  2. Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975, Chicago: Stanford University Press.
  3. Kim, E. M. (1993) ‘Contradictions and Limits of a Developmental State: With Illustrations from the South Korean Case’, Social Problems, No: 40, 2: 228–49.
  4. Kim, E. M. (1999) ‘Crisis of the Developmental State in South Korea’, Asian Perspective, No: 23, p. 35–55.
  5. Öniş, Z. (1991) “The Logic of the Developmental State” Comparative Politics, Vol. 24, No:1, p. 109-26.
  6. Pradella, L. (2014) “New Developmentalism and the Origins of Methodological Nationalism”, Competition and Change, Vol.18, No: 2, p.180-93.
  7. Reinert, E. S. (2007) How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor, London: Constable.
  8. Song, H-Y (2011) “Theorising the Korean State beyond Institutionalism: Class Content and Form of ‘National’ Development”, New Political Economy, Vol.16, No: 3, p. 281-302.
  9. Song, H-Y (2013) “Marxist Critiques of the Developmental State and the Fetishism of National Development” Antipode, Vol. 45, No: 5, p. 1254-1276.
  10. Wade, R. (2000) ‘Wheels Within Wheels: Rethinking the Asian Crisis and the Asian Model’, Annual Reviews of Political Science, 2000, p. 85–115.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mollaer, Ö. (2016). Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.265156
AMA
1.Mollaer Ö. Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. beta. 2016;1(1):1-12. doi:10.25229/beta.265156
Chicago
Mollaer, Ömer. 2016. “Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 1 (1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.265156.
EndNote
Mollaer Ö (01 Aralık 2016) Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 1 1 1–12.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Mollaer, “Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique”, beta, c. 1, sy 1, ss. 1–12, Ara. 2016, doi: 10.25229/beta.265156.
ISNAD
Mollaer, Ömer. “Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 1/1 (01 Aralık 2016): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.265156.
JAMA
1.Mollaer Ö. Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. beta. 2016;1:1–12.
MLA
Mollaer, Ömer. “Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, c. 1, sy 1, Aralık 2016, ss. 1-12, doi:10.25229/beta.265156.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Mollaer. Developmental State: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. beta. 01 Aralık 2016;1(1):1-12. doi:10.25229/beta.265156