Araştırma Makalesi

Fiscal Performance and Budget Transparency: An Application for OECD Countries

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 29 Ekim 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Fiscal Performance and Budget Transparency: An Application for OECD Countries

Abstract

Ensuring transparency and accountability throughout all stages of the budgeting process is of vital importance for the successful implementation of economic, fiscal, and social policies. However, insufficient levels of transparency and accountability in budgeting can hinder effective intervention—particularly in situations requiring substantial fiscal regulation—and limit efforts to improve countries’ fiscal performance. In this study, the fiscal performance of selected OECD countries was first analyzed using the MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) method, one of the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. The results of the analysis indicate that Norway, Sweden, and Germany recorded the highest fiscal performance scores, while Japan, the United States, and Mexico ranked lowest. In the second stage of the analysis, the relationship between fiscal performance ranking and the budget transparency ranking and budget oversight ranking was examined. Statistically significant correlations were identified between the fiscal performance ranking and the rankings of the these two variables. These findings suggest that countries with high levels of budget transparency and accountability tend to achieve better fiscal performance outcomes.

Keywords

Budget Transparency , Budget Deficit , Public Debt , MABAC OECD Countries

Kaynakça

  1. Abdulhakeem, K. A. (2020). Budget Transparency and Fiscal Performance: Lessons for Nigeria and Sri Lanka. Working Papers 5, Department of Economics, University of Ilorin.
  2. Albassam, B. (2015). The influence of budget transparency on quality of governance. Journal of Law and Governance, 10(3), 97-116.
  3. Alesina, A. F., & Perotti, R. (1999). Budget Deficits and Budget Institutions, Poterba, J. M. (Ed.) in Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance (p. 13-36). London: University of Chicago Press
  4. Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2003). Fiscal Transparency and Fiscal Policy Outcomes in OECD Countries. EPRU Working Paper Series 03-02, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.
  5. Altıntaş, F. F. (2023). G7 grubu ülkelerin bütçe şeffaflığı performanslarının analizi: Merec tabanlı pıv yöntemi ile bir uygulama. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(4), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1230689
  6. Arbatlı, E., & Escolano, J. (2015). Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Performance and Credit Ratings. Fiscal Studies, 36(2), 237–270.
  7. Ballesteros, C. B., & Bisogno, M. (2022). Budget transparency and financial sustainability. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 210-234. 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2022-0025
  8. Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2009). Budget Transparency, Fiscal Performance, and Political Turnout: An International Approach. Public Administration Review, May-June, 403-417.
  9. Birskyte, L. (2019). Determinants of Budget Transparency in Lithuanian Municipalities, Public Performance & Management Review, 42:3, 707-731, 10.1080/15309576.2018.1507915
  10. Bronic, M., Stanic, B., & Prijakovic, S. (2022). The Effects of Budget Transparency on The Budget Balances and Expenditures of Croatian Local Governments. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 17(1), 111-124. 10.2478/jeb-2022-0008

Kaynak Göster

APA
İnam, B., & Murat, D. (2025). Fiscal Performance and Budget Transparency: An Application for OECD Countries. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 10(3), 1241-1262. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1663853