BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

INNOVATION ACTORS IN SOUTH KOREA: AN ANAYLYSIS OF UNIVERSTY, INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT RESEARCH CENTERS

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 175 - 191, 01.12.2012

Erhan Atay

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Chai, Sung Sung, (2007). Korean national system of innovation and FDIs. In Maximilian Von Zedwitz, D. K. Bok, Sahngo Chung (Edts), R&D Interplay in Northeast Asia, Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institiute.
  • Chung, H. H. (2007), Lessons from the Korean venture industry development, World Bank Working Paper, 39379.
  • Chung, Sungchul, (2010). Innovation, competitiveness, and growth: Korean experiences, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2010, Global, 334.
  • Chung, Sunyang (2011). Academia- industry- government interaction in the Republic of Korea. In Martin Michaela (Edt), In search of triple helix academia-industry- government interaction China, Poland and Republic of Korea, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning. pp:163-202
  • Eoma, Boo Young, Lee, Keun (2010). Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization, Research Policy, 39, 625-639.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff (1997). Introduction: Universities in the lobal knowledge economy. In Henry Etzkowitz & Loet Leydesdorff (Edts), Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations, London: Pinter. pp 1-8, p-2-3.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry (2003). Innovation in innovation. The triple helix of universityindustry-govemment relations’, Social Science Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 42(3), 293-337.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
  • Keenan, Michael (2012). Moving to the innovation frontier: lessons from the OECD review of Korean innovation policy. In Mahlich, J. and Pascha, W. (eds.), Korean Science and Technology in an International Perspective, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp: 15-40.
  • Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Koita, (Korea Industrial Technology Association), (2012), http://www.koita.or.kr/eng/indicators/koita industrial.asp (accessed at 1 August, 2012).
  • Koo, Min Chul, (2010), State-Funded Research Institutes Need Reform, http://www.koreaherald.com/specialreport/Detail.jsp?newsMLId=20100630000634 (accessed at August 3, 2012).
  • Korea Institute of S&T Planning and Evaluation, (2010), Survey of Research and Development in Korea 2010. Seoul: National Science and Technology Commission.
  • Lee, Brian H. (2007), Enhancing the Competitiveness of SMEs: Subnational Innovation Systems and, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Technological Capacity-Building Policies, Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
  • Lee, J. and S. J. Koh (2007). Study on the Policy Measurement for Promoting the Industry and University Cooperation, Seoul: Korean Institiute of Technology Foundation (KITF).
  • Lee, K. and Kim, S. S. (2000). Characteristics and Economic Efficiency of the Venture Companies in Korea: Comparison with the Chaebols and Other Traditional Firms, Seoul Journal of Economisc, 13(3): 335-360.
  • Niosi, J. Saviotti, P.P. and Bellon, B. Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovations: in search of a workable concept, Technology in Society,( 15), 207-227.
  • OECD, (2009). Reviews of innovation policy: Korea, Paris, OECD.
  • Park, Han Woo, Leydesdorff, Loet (2010), Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives, Research Policy 39 (2010) 640-649.
  • Sohn, D. W. and Kenney, M. (2007), Universities, clusters, and innovation systems: The case of Seoul, Korea, World Development Vol. 35 (6), pp. 991-1004, p:994.
  • Suh, Joonghae; Aubert, Jean Eric; Ahn, Do-Geol, and Chen, Derek, H. C. (2006). Overview. In Suh, Joonghae and Aubert, Jean Eric (edts), Korea as a Knowledge Economy Evolutionary Process and Lessons Learned, Washington, D.C: The World Bank Institute.
  • Suh, J. H. (2009). Development srategy and evolution of Korea’s innovation system. In Lim, Won Hyuk (edt), Models for national technology and innovation capacity development in Turkey, Seoul: Ministry of Strategy and Finance & Korea Development Institute.
  • Tidd, J. (2006), A review of innovation models, Imperial College, London: Tanaka Business School, , http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/portal/pls/portallive/docs/ 1/7290726.PDF (accessed at April 1, 2012).
  • Ungson, G. R. , Steers, R. M. and Park, S. H. (1997). Korean enterprise: The quest for globalization, Boston: Harward Business School Press.

GÜNEY KORE’NİN İNOVASYON AKTÖRLERİ: ÜNİVERSİTE, SANAYİ VE KAMU ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZLERİNİN ANALİZİ

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 175 - 191, 01.12.2012

Erhan Atay

Öz

Teknolojik bir rekabet gücü elde etmek için hükümetin, endüstrinin ve üniversitelerin inovasyon gayretleri
Kore’nin küresel rekabet gücüne sahip olmasının önünün açtı. Bu makale üniversiteler, kamu araştırma
kurumları ve özel sektör gibi inovasyon aktörlerinin durumlarını ve birbirleriyle olan ilişkilerini araştırmaktadır.
Üniversiteler Kore deki araştırmacıların % 27’sini, doktoralı mühendis ve bilim insanlarının ise %66’sını
bünyesinde barındırmalarına rağmen, kalkınmanın ilk yıllarından bu yana patent başvurularında özel sektör her
zaman önde oldu. Üniversiteler daha çok bilimsel yayınlarda öne çıkarak, SCI endeksli yayın sayısına göre
Kore’nin dünyada 15. ülke olmasını sağladılar.
Kamu araştırma merkezleri yerli sanayinin yabancı teknolojiyi içselleştirerek geliştirmelerine yardımcı oldular.
Ayrıca tecrübeli araştırmacıları yetiştirip üniversitelere ve yeni kurulan endüstriyel araştırma merkezlerine
gönderen bir okul vazifesi yaptılar.
Üçüncü önemli inovasyon aktörü özel kuruluşlarıdır. Rekabet gücünü elde etmede büyük aile holdingleri olan
‘chaebollerin’ katkısı büyüktür. Kuruluşlarının ilk yıllarında seri üretimle bir kaç kalem üreten chaeboller
zamanla kalite artırımı, teknolojik üstünlüğü elde etme gibi amaçlarla araştırma ve geliştirme faaliyetlerine önem
verdiler. Daha çok büyük holdinglerin teminatçısı olan ve emeğe dayalı üretim yapan küçük ve orta ölçekli
işletmeler ise özellikle 1997 Asya finansal krizi sonrasında uygulanan hükümet politikalarıyla araştırma ve
geliştirme merkezli üretime odaklandılar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kore İnovasyon Kamu Araştırma Merkezi Üniversite Endüstri

Kaynakça

  • Chai, Sung Sung, (2007). Korean national system of innovation and FDIs. In Maximilian Von Zedwitz, D. K. Bok, Sahngo Chung (Edts), R&D Interplay in Northeast Asia, Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institiute.
  • Chung, H. H. (2007), Lessons from the Korean venture industry development, World Bank Working Paper, 39379.
  • Chung, Sungchul, (2010). Innovation, competitiveness, and growth: Korean experiences, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2010, Global, 334.
  • Chung, Sunyang (2011). Academia- industry- government interaction in the Republic of Korea. In Martin Michaela (Edt), In search of triple helix academia-industry- government interaction China, Poland and Republic of Korea, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning. pp:163-202
  • Eoma, Boo Young, Lee, Keun (2010). Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization, Research Policy, 39, 625-639.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff (1997). Introduction: Universities in the lobal knowledge economy. In Henry Etzkowitz & Loet Leydesdorff (Edts), Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations, London: Pinter. pp 1-8, p-2-3.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry (2003). Innovation in innovation. The triple helix of universityindustry-govemment relations’, Social Science Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 42(3), 293-337.
  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
  • Keenan, Michael (2012). Moving to the innovation frontier: lessons from the OECD review of Korean innovation policy. In Mahlich, J. and Pascha, W. (eds.), Korean Science and Technology in an International Perspective, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp: 15-40.
  • Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Koita, (Korea Industrial Technology Association), (2012), http://www.koita.or.kr/eng/indicators/koita industrial.asp (accessed at 1 August, 2012).
  • Koo, Min Chul, (2010), State-Funded Research Institutes Need Reform, http://www.koreaherald.com/specialreport/Detail.jsp?newsMLId=20100630000634 (accessed at August 3, 2012).
  • Korea Institute of S&T Planning and Evaluation, (2010), Survey of Research and Development in Korea 2010. Seoul: National Science and Technology Commission.
  • Lee, Brian H. (2007), Enhancing the Competitiveness of SMEs: Subnational Innovation Systems and, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Technological Capacity-Building Policies, Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
  • Lee, J. and S. J. Koh (2007). Study on the Policy Measurement for Promoting the Industry and University Cooperation, Seoul: Korean Institiute of Technology Foundation (KITF).
  • Lee, K. and Kim, S. S. (2000). Characteristics and Economic Efficiency of the Venture Companies in Korea: Comparison with the Chaebols and Other Traditional Firms, Seoul Journal of Economisc, 13(3): 335-360.
  • Niosi, J. Saviotti, P.P. and Bellon, B. Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovations: in search of a workable concept, Technology in Society,( 15), 207-227.
  • OECD, (2009). Reviews of innovation policy: Korea, Paris, OECD.
  • Park, Han Woo, Leydesdorff, Loet (2010), Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives, Research Policy 39 (2010) 640-649.
  • Sohn, D. W. and Kenney, M. (2007), Universities, clusters, and innovation systems: The case of Seoul, Korea, World Development Vol. 35 (6), pp. 991-1004, p:994.
  • Suh, Joonghae; Aubert, Jean Eric; Ahn, Do-Geol, and Chen, Derek, H. C. (2006). Overview. In Suh, Joonghae and Aubert, Jean Eric (edts), Korea as a Knowledge Economy Evolutionary Process and Lessons Learned, Washington, D.C: The World Bank Institute.
  • Suh, J. H. (2009). Development srategy and evolution of Korea’s innovation system. In Lim, Won Hyuk (edt), Models for national technology and innovation capacity development in Turkey, Seoul: Ministry of Strategy and Finance & Korea Development Institute.
  • Tidd, J. (2006), A review of innovation models, Imperial College, London: Tanaka Business School, , http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/portal/pls/portallive/docs/ 1/7290726.PDF (accessed at April 1, 2012).
  • Ungson, G. R. , Steers, R. M. and Park, S. H. (1997). Korean enterprise: The quest for globalization, Boston: Harward Business School Press.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Erhan Atay Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Atay, E. (2012). GÜNEY KORE’NİN İNOVASYON AKTÖRLERİ: ÜNİVERSİTE, SANAYİ VE KAMU ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Bilgi Ekonomisi Ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 7(2), 175-191.