Araştırma Makalesi
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?

Yıl 2009, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 57 - 69, 01.06.2009

Öz

Traditional value chain, whose scope of application is essentially industrial, has ceased to be meaningful. They have been replaced by new business models (strongly developed through electronic platforms), structured around powerful “networks”. Sharing information, the use of communal structures, the speed of technological developments, the heightened use of resources, and its modular nature, instils strategies in this type of company which are based on a capacity to anticipate, innovate and make shared use of opportunities. Knowledge management is dominated by the applications of the second industrial revolution conquests and technological revolution, where information, aggregated to communication technologies, assumes a basic role in the sustainable development and in the company's level competitiveness. While marked by connectivity, information, convergence and mobility, knowledge management will be expressed, independently of the perspective analysis, in a strong and deep cultural transformation inside the companies and their relation with stakeholders. This is the genesis of an Electronic Knowledge Management Culture (EKMC). Based on fifty-one companies, most of them integrating the Euronext Lisbon Indexes, we have explored the typology of information (voluntary and non-voluntary) effectively released to stakeholders through corporate websites. Size of companies and net returns seems to contribute positively for the quality and quantity of information effectively disseminated.

Kaynakça

  • Alavi, Maryam and Leidner, Dorothy E. (2001) “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, N. º 1, March, pp. 107-136.
  • Boisot, M H. (1995) Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture, London UK: Routledge.
  • Bontis, Nick (2001) “Assessing Knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 41-60.
  • Choo, Chun Wei (2001) “Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning” http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/papper112.html].
  • Vol. 7, Nº1 [Available at:
  • CMVM – Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários, Estudos, available online at http://www.cmvm.pt
  • Davenport, Thomas and Prusak, Laurence (1998) Working Knowledge – How Organizations Manage What they Know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dretske, Fred I. (1981) Knowledge & the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
  • Drucker, Peter (1993) Post-Capitalist Society, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  • Dzinkowshi, Ramona (2000) “The measurement and management of intellectual capital”, Management Accounting, February, pp. 32-36.
  • Gigerenzer, Gerd (2005) Calcular o Risco – Aprender a Lidar com a Incerteza, Lisboa: Gradiva.
  • Jacobsen, Kristine; Hofman-Bang, Peder; Nordby Jr, Reidar (2005) “The IC Rating™ model by Intellectual Capital Sweden”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 6, N. º 4, pp. 570-587.
  • Kelly, Kevin (1998) New Rules for the New Economy, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  • Leidner, Dorothy E. (1998) “Understanding Information Cultures: integrating knowledge management into organizations” INSEAD working paper, Paris: INSEAD.
  • Lopes, Ilídio T.; Rodrigues, Ana Maria G. (2007) “Knowledge Management Systems and Performance Analysis in Electronic Business Models”, The ICFAI Journal of Knowledge Management”, Vol. V, N. º2, Panjagutta, Hydebarad India, March, ISSN 0972-9216, pp. 7-19.
  • Lynn, B. E. (2000) “Intellectual capital – Unearthing hidden value by managing intellectual assets”, Ivey Business Journal, January-February, pp. 48-52.
  • Marchand, Donald A.; Wiiliam J. Kettinger and John D. Rollins (2001) Information Orientation: the link to business performance, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, Vol.5, n. º1, February, pp. 14-37.
  • Nonaka, Ikujiro and Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995) The Knowledge – Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Quigley, E. J. and Debons, A. (1999) “Interrogative Theory of Information and Knowledge”, in Proceedings of SIGCPR ´99, ACM Press, New Orleans, LA, pp. 4-10.
  • Ross, S. (1993) “The economic theory of agency: The main’s problem”, American Economic Review, 63, pp. 13-139.
  • Roos, Johan; Roos, G ran; Dragonetti, Nicola C.; Edvinsson, Leif (1997) Intellectual Capital: navigating the new business landscape, London: Macmillan Press.
  • Shapiro, Carl and Varian, hal. R. (1999) Information rules: a Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
  • Stewart, Thomas A. (1994) “Your Company’s Most Valuable Asset: Intellectual capital”, Fortune, October, pp.68-74.
  • Stewart, Thomas A. (1997) Intellectual Capital – The New Wealth of Organizations, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
  • Sveiby, Kark Erik (1997) The New Organizational Wealth: managing and measuring knowledge-based assets, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kowhler Publishers.
  • Szábo, Katalin (1999) “Networks in Hyper-Competition - Decomposition of Companies into Molecular Units and their Re-Integration into Networks”, Journal of European Business Education, Issue 9, n. º 1, December, pp.80-92.
  • Tapscott, Don; Ticoll, David and Lowy, Ticoll (2000) Digital Capital – Harnessing the Power of Business Webs, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
  • Teece, David J. (1998) “Capturing Value form Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets”, California Management Review, Vol.40, n. º3, Spring, pp. 55-79.
  • Tofler, Alvin (1990) Os Novos Poderes, Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores.
  • Tiwana, Amrit (2000) The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy, and Knowledge Platforms, Second Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Tuomi, I. (2000) “Data is More than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Winter, Vol.16, n. º3, pp. 103-117.
  • Zack, M. H. (1999) “Managing codified knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, 40, 4, pp. 45-58.
  • Willigan, Walter L. (2001) “Leveraging your Intellectual Property: A Proven Path to Value Extraction”, Valuation of Intangible Assets in Global Operations, Farok J. Contractor (Editor), London: Quorum Books.

FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?

Yıl 2009, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 57 - 69, 01.06.2009

Öz

Traditional value chain, whose scope of application is essentially industrial, has ceased to be meaningful. They have been replaced by new business models (strongly developed through electronic platforms), structured around powerful “networks”. Sharing information, the use of communal structures, the speed of technological developments, the heightened use of resources, and its modular nature, instils strategies in this type of company which are based on a capacity to anticipate, innovate and make shared use of opportunities. Knowledge management is dominated by the applications of the second industrial revolution conquests and technological revolution, where information, aggregated to communication technologies, assumes a basic role in the sustainable development and in the company’s level competitiveness. While marked by connectivity, information, convergence and mobility, knowledge management will be expressed, independently of the perspective analysis, in a strong and deep cultural transformation inside the companies and their relation with stakeholders. This is the genesis of an Electronic Knowledge Management Culture (EKMC). Based on fifty-one companies, most of them integrating the Euronext Lisbon Indexes, we have explored the typology of information (voluntary and non-voluntary) effectively released to stakeholders through corporate websites. Size of companies and net returns seems to contribute positively for the quality and quantity of information effectively disseminated.

Kaynakça

  • Alavi, Maryam and Leidner, Dorothy E. (2001) “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, N. º 1, March, pp. 107-136.
  • Boisot, M H. (1995) Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture, London UK: Routledge.
  • Bontis, Nick (2001) “Assessing Knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 41-60.
  • Choo, Chun Wei (2001) “Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning” http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/papper112.html].
  • Vol. 7, Nº1 [Available at:
  • CMVM – Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários, Estudos, available online at http://www.cmvm.pt
  • Davenport, Thomas and Prusak, Laurence (1998) Working Knowledge – How Organizations Manage What they Know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dretske, Fred I. (1981) Knowledge & the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
  • Drucker, Peter (1993) Post-Capitalist Society, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  • Dzinkowshi, Ramona (2000) “The measurement and management of intellectual capital”, Management Accounting, February, pp. 32-36.
  • Gigerenzer, Gerd (2005) Calcular o Risco – Aprender a Lidar com a Incerteza, Lisboa: Gradiva.
  • Jacobsen, Kristine; Hofman-Bang, Peder; Nordby Jr, Reidar (2005) “The IC Rating™ model by Intellectual Capital Sweden”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 6, N. º 4, pp. 570-587.
  • Kelly, Kevin (1998) New Rules for the New Economy, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  • Leidner, Dorothy E. (1998) “Understanding Information Cultures: integrating knowledge management into organizations” INSEAD working paper, Paris: INSEAD.
  • Lopes, Ilídio T.; Rodrigues, Ana Maria G. (2007) “Knowledge Management Systems and Performance Analysis in Electronic Business Models”, The ICFAI Journal of Knowledge Management”, Vol. V, N. º2, Panjagutta, Hydebarad India, March, ISSN 0972-9216, pp. 7-19.
  • Lynn, B. E. (2000) “Intellectual capital – Unearthing hidden value by managing intellectual assets”, Ivey Business Journal, January-February, pp. 48-52.
  • Marchand, Donald A.; Wiiliam J. Kettinger and John D. Rollins (2001) Information Orientation: the link to business performance, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, Vol.5, n. º1, February, pp. 14-37.
  • Nonaka, Ikujiro and Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995) The Knowledge – Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Quigley, E. J. and Debons, A. (1999) “Interrogative Theory of Information and Knowledge”, in Proceedings of SIGCPR ´99, ACM Press, New Orleans, LA, pp. 4-10.
  • Ross, S. (1993) “The economic theory of agency: The main’s problem”, American Economic Review, 63, pp. 13-139.
  • Roos, Johan; Roos, G ran; Dragonetti, Nicola C.; Edvinsson, Leif (1997) Intellectual Capital: navigating the new business landscape, London: Macmillan Press.
  • Shapiro, Carl and Varian, hal. R. (1999) Information rules: a Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
  • Stewart, Thomas A. (1994) “Your Company’s Most Valuable Asset: Intellectual capital”, Fortune, October, pp.68-74.
  • Stewart, Thomas A. (1997) Intellectual Capital – The New Wealth of Organizations, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
  • Sveiby, Kark Erik (1997) The New Organizational Wealth: managing and measuring knowledge-based assets, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kowhler Publishers.
  • Szábo, Katalin (1999) “Networks in Hyper-Competition - Decomposition of Companies into Molecular Units and their Re-Integration into Networks”, Journal of European Business Education, Issue 9, n. º 1, December, pp.80-92.
  • Tapscott, Don; Ticoll, David and Lowy, Ticoll (2000) Digital Capital – Harnessing the Power of Business Webs, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
  • Teece, David J. (1998) “Capturing Value form Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets”, California Management Review, Vol.40, n. º3, Spring, pp. 55-79.
  • Tofler, Alvin (1990) Os Novos Poderes, Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores.
  • Tiwana, Amrit (2000) The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy, and Knowledge Platforms, Second Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Tuomi, I. (2000) “Data is More than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Winter, Vol.16, n. º3, pp. 103-117.
  • Zack, M. H. (1999) “Managing codified knowledge”, Sloan Management Review, 40, 4, pp. 45-58.
  • Willigan, Walter L. (2001) “Leveraging your Intellectual Property: A Proven Path to Value Extraction”, Valuation of Intangible Assets in Global Operations, Farok J. Contractor (Editor), London: Quorum Books.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

İlídio Tomás LOPES Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2009
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009, Cilt 4, Sayı 1

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { beyder47348, journal = {Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi}, eissn = {1308-3937}, address = {}, publisher = {İbrahim Güran YUMUŞAK}, year = {2009}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {57 - 69}, title = {FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?}, key = {cite}, author = {Lopes, İlídio Tomás} }
APA Lopes, İ. T. (2009). FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS? . Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi , 4 (1) , 57-69 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/beyder/issue/3480/47348
MLA Lopes, İ. T. "FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?" . Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi 4 (2009 ): 57-69 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/beyder/issue/3480/47348>
Chicago Lopes, İ. T. "FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?". Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi 4 (2009 ): 57-69
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS? AU - İlídio TomásLopes Y1 - 2009 PY - 2009 N1 - DO - T2 - Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 57 EP - 69 VL - 4 IS - 1 SN - -1308-3937 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS? %A İlídio Tomás Lopes %T FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS? %D 2009 %J Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi %P -1308-3937 %V 4 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD Lopes, İlídio Tomás . "FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?". Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi 4 / 1 (Haziran 2009): 57-69 .
AMA Lopes İ. T. FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?. Journal of Knowlede Economy & Knowledge Management. 2009; 4(1): 57-69.
Vancouver Lopes İ. T. FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. 2009; 4(1): 57-69.
IEEE İ. T. Lopes , "FROM INFORMATION CAPTURE TO KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION: HOW TO MEET THE STAKEHOLDERS` INFORMATION NEEDS?", Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, c. 4, sayı. 1, ss. 57-69, Haz. 2009