The Social Representations of Sustainability: A Study on University Students

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 165 - 174, 30.09.2024

Ergül Söylemezoğlu , Gamze Özdemir Planalı

Öz

In theoretical terms, sustainability encompasses many different phenomena such as finance, ecology, and social sustainability. However, there is no such research on how this term is perceived by the internal stakeholders of universities in Turkey. In the present study, for the first time in Turkey, social representations of sustainability in higher education were investigated with the participation of 165 undergraduate students at a state university with institutional accreditation. The ages of the participants ranged between 18 and 43 (X ̅=20.50, SD=3.32). The diversity (d =.70) and rarity (d =.75) indices showed that students did not have a common understanding of sustainability. Additionally, it was revealed that the words "quality", "hygiene", "efficiency", "food", "education", "technology", "recycling","energy", and "transport" had an important place in the social representation structure of sustainability. In general, it was observed that students constructed the concept of sustainability through other institutional concepts, their own needs and environmental issues. It is concluded that the social and economic aspects of sustainability were relatively ignored. The social and economic aspects of sustainability were relatively ignored. The findings of the research were discussed in terms of higher education policies to be developed to create a more comprehensive and common organizational understanding of the concept of sustainability at Turkish universities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainability, Higher education, Social representations, Hierarchical association test

Sürdürülebı̇lı̇rliğı̇n Sosyal Temsilleri̇: Ünı̇versı̇te Öğrencileri̇ Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Teorik anlamda sürdürülebilirlik; ekonomi, ekoloji ve sosyal sürdürülebilirlik gibi birçok farklı olguyu kapsamaktadır. Ancak bu kavramın Türkiye'deki üniversitelerin iç paydaşları tarafından nasıl algılandığına dair bir araştırma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de ilk kez, kurumsal akreditasyona sahip bir devlet üniversitesindeki 165 lisans öğrencisinin katılımıyla yükseköğretimde sürdürülebilirliğin sosyal temsilleri araştırılmıştır. Katılımcıların yaşları 18 ile 43 arasında değişmektedir (X ̅ = 20.50, SS = 3.32). Çeşitlilik (d = .70) ve nadirlik indeksleri (h = .75), öğrencilerin sürdürülebilirlik ile ilgili ortak bir anlayışa sahip olmadığını göstermiştir. Ek olarak, sürdürülebilirliğin sosyal temsil yapısında "kalite", "hijyen", "verimlilik", “gıda”, “eğitim”, "teknoloji", "geri dönüşüm", “enerji” ve “ulaşım” kelimelerinin önemli bir yere sahip olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Genel olarak, öğrencilerin sürdürülebilirlik kavramını diğer kurumsal kavramlar, kendi ihtiyaçları ve çevre ile ilgili meseleler üzerinden inşa ettiği görülmüştür. Sürdürülebilirliğin sosyal ve ekonomik yönlerinin ise görece göz ardı edildiği çıkarımına ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları, Türkiye’deki üniversitelerde sürdürülebilirlik kavramına ilişkin daha kapsamlı ve yaygın bir kurumsal anlayışın oluşturulması için geliştirilecek yükseköğretim politikaları açısından tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik, Yükseköğretim, Sosyal Temsiller, Hiyerarşik Çağrışım Testi

Kaynakça

• ABRIC, J. C. (1993). “Central System, Peripheral System: Their Functions and Roles in the Dynamics of Social Representations”. Papers on Social Representations, 2(2): 75-78.
• ALFIREVIĆ, N., MIHANOVIĆ, D., PETKOVIĆ, S. (2019). “Higher Education Students' Understanding Of Natural And Social Sustainability: Preliminary Empirical Research In South East Europe”. 7th Redete Conference Researching Economic Development and Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies.
• AMRINA, E., ve IMANSURI, F. (2015). “Key Performance Indicators For Sustainable Campus Assessment: A Case Of Andalas University”. Mitsuo Gen vd., (Ed.), Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015 (11-18). Springer, London.
• BOZOĞLU, O., ve CIĞERIM, E. (2022). “Sürdürülebilirlik, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Ve Sürdürülebilir Üniversiteler”. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 18: 146-158.
• CARADONNA, J. L. (2014). Sustainability: A history. Oxford University Press.
• DANY, L., URDAPILLETA, I. ve Lo MONACO, G. (2015). “Free Associations And Social Representations: Some Reflections On Rank-Frequency And Importance-Frequency Methods”. Quality & Quantity, 49(2): 489-507.
• DOISE, W., CLEMENCE, A. ve LORENZI-CIOLDI, F. (1993). “The Quantitative Analysis of Social Representations”.
• Routledge.ELMASSAH, S., BILTAGY, M. ve GAMAL, D. (2022). “Framing The Role Of Higher Education In Sustainable Development: A Case Study Analysis”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(2): 320-355.
• FILHO, L. vd. (2019). “The Role Of Higher Education Institutions In Sustainability Initiatives At The Local Level”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233: 1004-1015.
• FINNVEDEN, G., NEWMAN, J., VERHOEF, L. A. (2019). “Sustainable Development And Higher Education: Acting With A Purpose”. Sustainability, 11(14): 3831.
• FISSI, S., ROMOLINI, A., GORI, E. ve CONTRI, M. (2021). “The Path Toward A Sustainable Green University: The Case Of The University Of Florence”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279: 1-9.
• GÜNERHAN, S., & GÜNERHAN, H. (2016). “Türkiye İçin Sürdürülebilir Üniversite Modeli”. Mühendis ve Makina, 57(682): 54–62.
• KLEIN, L L., DE GUIMARÃES, J.C.F., SEVERO, E.A., DORION, E.C.H. ve SCHIRMER FELTRIN, T. (2023). “Lean Practices Toward A Balanced Sustainability In Higher Education Institutions: A Brazilian Experience”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(2): 259-278.
• LO MONACO, G., PIERMATTÉO, A., RATEAU, P. ve TAVANI, J. L. (2017). “Methods for Studying the Structure of Social Representations: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3): 306-331.
• MOSCOVICI, S. (2000). “The Phenomenon Of Social Representations”. S. Moscovici ve G. Duveen (Ed.), Social Representations: Explorations In Social Psychology (18-77). Cambridge University Press
• MOSCOVICI, S. (1984). “The Phenomenon Of Social Representations”. R. M. Farr ve S. Moscovici (Ed.), Social Representations (3-70). Cambridge University Press.
• NASIR, V. A. (2012). “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma İçin Yükseköğretim Politika Ve Stratejileri”. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 2(3), ss. 137–141.
• OROSZ, G. ve ROLAND-LÉVY, C. (2013). “Social Representation of Competition and Fraud”. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 8(2): 157-177.
• ÖZTÜRK, M. (2018). “Response Of Educational Research In Turkey To The UN Decade Of Education For Sustainable Development”. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19: 573–586.
• RAMÍSIO, P. J., PINTO, L. M. C., GOUVEIA, N., COSTA, H. ve AREZES, D. (2019). “Sustainability Strategy In Higher Education Institutions: Lessons Learned From A Nine-Year Case Study”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222: 300-309.
• RAMPASSO, I.S., ANHOLON, R., QUELHAS, O.L.G., VELAZQUEZ, L. ve MAC-LEAN, C. (2023). “Guest Editorial: Latin American Perspectives On Sustainability In Higher Education”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(2): 233-234.
• RATEAU, P., MOLINER, P., GUIMELLI, C. ve ABRIC, J. (2012). “Social Representation Theory”. P. A. M. Van Lange, A.
• W. Kruglanski ve E. T. Higgins (Ed.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 2 ( 477-497). Sage Publications.
• RODRIGUES, H., BALLESTER, J., SAENZ-NAVAJAS, M. P. ve VALENTIN, D. (2015). “Structural Approach of Social Representation: Application to the Concept of Wine Minerality in Experts and Consumers”. Food Quality and Preference, 46: 166-172.SONETTI, G., SARRICA, M. ve NORTON, L. S. (2021). “Conceptualization Of Sustainability Among Students, Administrative And Teaching Staff Of A University Community: An Exploratory Study In Italy”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128292: 1-9.
• TANÇ, G., TANÇ, Ş., ÇARDAK, A., YAĞLI, D. İ. (2022). “Türkiye’deki Üniversitelerin Sürdürülebilirlik Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi”. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış Dergisi, 66: 83-100.
• UNESCO (2017). “Guidelines On Sustainability Science In Research And Education”. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260600
• RUSINKO, C.A. (2010). “Integrating Sustainability In Higher Education: A Generic Matrix”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(3): 250-259.
• VAN WEENEN, H. (2000). “Towards A Vision Of A Sustainable University”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(1): 20-34.
• VELAZQUEZ, L., MUNGUIA, N., PLATT, A. ve TADDEI, J. (2006). “Sustainable University: What Can Be The Matter?” Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11): 810–819.
• WRIGHT, T. S. (2002). “Definitions and Frameworks For Environmental Sustainability In Higher Education”. Higher Education Policy, 15(2): 105-120.
• WRIGHT, S. ve SHORE, C. (2017). Death of The Public University?: Uncertain Futures For Higher Education In The Knowledge Economy. Berghahn Books, New York.