Araştırma Makalesi

A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2024
PDF İndir
EN

A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis

Öz

Since cancer is a serious disease that affects many people around the world, scientists focus on studies on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Plants have been used for therapeutic purposes for many years. Plants that form the basis of traditional medicine contain therapeutic compounds. These compounds have important properties such as anticancer, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antimicrobial and antioxidant. Essential oils obtained from various plants are known to have therapeutic effects. Terpenes make up the largest part of the composition of plant essential oils. Terpenes have various beneficial effects such as anti-anxiety, anti-depressant, anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-cancer, analgesic and mood-boosting. 1,8 cineole is one of the monoterpene compounds found in essential oils. 1,8 cineole is an important compound with various properties such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer. The molecular docking method is one of the computational modeling methods used in drug development programs. In this study, the interactions of 1,8 cineole, which is known to have anticancer properties, with various receptors prominent in anticancer studies (estrogen receptor beta (ER-β), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (HER2) and Tankyrase 1) were examined with the help of the molecular docking method, the interaction profile was determined and presented in comparison with literature studies. As a result of docking studies, it was predicted that the interaction with Tankyrase-1 would be stronger.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Teşekkür

I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Uğur Gündüz and Prof. Dr. Serda Kecel Gündüz for their support.

Kaynakça

  1. Abdalla, A. N., Shaheen, U., Abdallah, Q. M., Flamini, G., Bkhaitan, M. M., Abdelhady, M. I., . . . Bader, A. (2020). Proapoptotic activity of Achillea membranacea essential oil and its major constituent 1, 8-cineole against A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Molecules, 25(7), 1582.
  2. Ahcene Djaballah, S., Daniel, F., Milani, A., Ricagno, G., & Lonardi, S. (2022). HER2 in colorectal cancer: the long and winding road from negative predictive factor to positive actionable target. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 42, 219-232.
  3. Arqués, O., Chicote, I., Puig, I., Tenbaum, S. P., Argilés, G., Dienstmann, R., . . . Silberschmidt, D. (2016). Tankyrase inhibition blocks Wnt/β-catenin pathway and reverts resistance to PI3K and AKT inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Clinical cancer research, 22(3), 644-656.
  4. Bethune, G., Bethune, D., Ridgway, N., & Xu, Z. (2010). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung cancer: an overview and update. Journal of thoracic disease, 2(1), 48.
  5. de Castro-Carpeño, J., Belda-Iniesta, C., Sáenz, E. C., Agudo, E. H., Batlle, J. F., & Barón, M. G. (2008). EGFR and colon cancer: a clinical view. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 10, 6-13.
  6. Dehelean, C. A., Marcovici, I., Soica, C., Mioc, M., Coricovac, D., Iurciuc, S., . . . Pinzaru, I. (2021). Plant-derived anticancer compounds as new perspectives in drug discovery and alternative therapy. Molecules, 26(4), 1109.
  7. DeLano, W. L. (2002). Pymol: An open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsl. Protein Crystallogr, 40(1), 82-92.
  8. Frisch, M., Trucks, G., Schlegel, H., Scuseria, G., Robb, M., Cheeseman, J., . . . Petersson, G. (2009). Gaussian 09 Revision A. 02, 2009, Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT, 66, 219.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ekoloji (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

31 Mart 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Mart 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Ocak 2024

Kabul Tarihi

31 Mart 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bıçak, B. (2024). A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 8(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.1415844
AMA
1.Bıçak B. A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis. bilgesci. 2024;8(1):50-55. doi:10.30516/bilgesci.1415844
Chicago
Bıçak, Bilge. 2024. “A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis”. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 8 (1): 50-55. https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.1415844.
EndNote
Bıçak B (01 Mart 2024) A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 8 1 50–55.
IEEE
[1]B. Bıçak, “A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis”, bilgesci, c. 8, sy 1, ss. 50–55, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.30516/bilgesci.1415844.
ISNAD
Bıçak, Bilge. “A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis”. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 8/1 (01 Mart 2024): 50-55. https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.1415844.
JAMA
1.Bıçak B. A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis. bilgesci. 2024;8:50–55.
MLA
Bıçak, Bilge. “A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis”. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, c. 8, sy 1, Mart 2024, ss. 50-55, doi:10.30516/bilgesci.1415844.
Vancouver
1.Bilge Bıçak. A study of the anticancer effect of 1,8 cineole: Molecular docking analysis. bilgesci. 01 Mart 2024;8(1):50-5. doi:10.30516/bilgesci.1415844

Cited By