Settlement Suitability Analysis: The Case of Bursa City

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 72 - 80, 30.09.2024

İmren Kuşcu

https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.1527354

Öz

Abstract: Nowadays, the existing built-up area texture in cities has started to shift towards areas that are not suitable for settlement. In this sense, settlement suitability analyses play a critical role in the realisation of sustainable development goals. Detailed analyses are required to formulate an effective settlement strategy in regions with large and diverse natural features such as Bursa. In this study, in order to determine the areas suitable for settlement in the study area, which covers the borders of Osmangazi, Nilüfer and Yıldırım districts, which are the central districts of Bursa city, a settlement suitability analysis was carried out with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method using 9 parameters consisting of slope, elevation, lithology, land use, precipitation, temperature, distance to stream, distance to fault and erosion. The main underlying data used in the study are 10m resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM), lithology, land use, erosion, precipitation, and temperature (WorldClim) data of Bursa city. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that 9% of the city is very suitable, 44% is less suitable and 47% is not suitable. The area where the city was established is in very suitable and moderate suitable class. It is observed that the settlements established in the study area, especially in the areas close to the fault line and the main river branch, are in the moderate suitability class. In addition, it has been determined that the erosion risk is in the low class, and the settlements far from the main river branch and fault line are in the very favourable class. While it is observed that Bursa city is located at appropriate values in terms of topography, it is seen that especially the southern part of the city is not sufficiently suitable in terms of distance to fault lines. The results obtained aim to contribute to sustainable settlement planning and to provide a guide for the methods and processes to be used in settlement suitability analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Settlement Suitability Analysis, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Bursa City.

Kaynakça

• Alam, N., Saha, S., Gupta, S., Chatterjee, A. (2023). Settlement suitability analysis of a riverine floodplain in the perspective of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(24), 66002-66020.
• Bayar, R. (2005). CBS yardımıyla modern alışveriş merkezleri için uygun yer seçimi: Ankara örneği. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 19-38.
• Chen, Y., Yu, J., Khan, S. (2010). Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(12), 1582–1591.
• Cui, P., Peng, J., Shi, P., Tang, H., Ouyang, C., Zou, Q., Liu, L., Li, C., Lei, Y. (2021). Scientific challenges of research on natural hazards and disaster risk. Geography and Sustainability, 2(3), 216-223.
• CRED, (2023). 2022 Disasters in Numbers. Brussels. This document is available at: https://cred.be/sites/default/files/2022_EMDAT_report.pdf
• Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M., Dizdar, E. N. (2005). Tedarikçi seçimi problemine analitik ağ süreci ile alternatif bir yaklaşım. Teknoloji, 8(2), 115-122.
• Değerliyurt, M. (2014). İskenderun-Arsuz ilçelerinin (Hatay) CBS tabanlı zemin hareketleri duyarlılık analizi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(5), 655-678.
• Dai, F. C., Lee, C. F., Zhang, X. H. (2001). GIS-based geo-environmental evalution for urban land-use planning: a case study. Engineering Geology, 61(4), 257-271.
• Ekinci, D., Sönmez, E. (2007). İstanbul konürbasyonunun yeni habitat adacığında CBS tabanlı jeoekolojı planlama analizi. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, (46), 147-167.
• Erinç, S. (1980). Jeoekoloji açısından İstanbul yöresi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Coğrafya Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23, 279-290.
• Fick, S. E., Hijmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 37(12), 4302-4315.
• Ghosh, A., Kar, S. K. (2018). Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: a case study in Malda district of West Bengal, India. Natural Hazards, 94(1), 349–368.
• Gupta, J. P. (2006). Land use planning in Indıa. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 300- 306.
• Hammami, S., Zouhri, L., Souissi, D., Souei, A., Zghibi, A., Marzougui, A., Dlala, M. (2019). Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(21), 1-16.
• Jeong, J. S., García-Moruno, L., Hernández-Blanco, J. (2013). A site planning approach for rural buildings into a landscape using a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis methodology. Land Use Policy, 32, 108–118.
• Karaoglu, G. T. (2013). İstanbul Küçükçekmece ilçesinin mühendislik jeolojisi ve yerleşime uygunluk değerlendirmesi. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Kazakis, N., Kougias, I., Patsialis, T. (2015). Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. Science of the Total Environ, 538, 555–563.
• MGM, (2021). Yılı Meteorolojik Afetler Değerlendirmesi. T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı, Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü.
• Mert, A., Acarer, A. (2018). Wildlife Diversity in Reed Beds Around Beyşehir Lake. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 2(1), 110-119.
• Miller, A. J. (1990). Flood hydrology and geomorphic effectiveness in the central Appalachians. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 15(2), 119-134.
• Nidumolu, U. B., De Bie, C. A. J. M., Van Keulen, H., Skidmore, A. K., Harmsen, K. (2006). Review of a land use planning programme through the soft systems methodology. Land Use Policy, 23(2), 187-203.
• Özdemir, S. (2024). Testing the Effect of Resolution on Species Distribution Models Using Two Invasive Species. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33(2), 1325-1335.
• Özkan, B., Özceylan, E., Sarıçiçek, İ. (2019). GIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(30), 30711–30730.
• Özşahin, E., Kaymaz, Ç. (2015). CBS ve AHS kullanılarak doğal çevre bileşenleri açısından kentsel mekânın yerleşime uygunluk analizine bir örnek: Antakya (Hatay). Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 20(33), 111-134.
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
• Süel, H., Ünal, Y., Özdemir, S., Koca, A. (2021). Hunting tourism map of Wild goat: antalya district. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 3(1), 77-86.
• Swain, K. C., Singha, C., Nayak, L. (2020). Flood susceptibility mapping through the GIS-AHP technique using the cloud. International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12), 1-23.
• Tang, L., Ruth, M., He, Q., Mirzae, S. (2017). Comprehensive evaluation of trends in human settlements quality changes and spatial differentiation characteristics of 35 Chinese major cities. Habitat International, 70, 81-90.
• Tekeş, A., Cürebal, İ. (2019). Arazi Kullanımı İle Yükselti Ve Eğim Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi: Şehzadeler (Manisa) İlçesi. Turkish Studies-Social Sciences, 14(4), 1787-1806.
• Tekin, S., Yalçınkaya, B., Acarer, A., Mert, A. (2018). A research on usage possibilities of satellite data in wildlife: Modeling habitat suitability of Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) with MaxEnt. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 2(2), 147-156.
• TÜİK,(2023).https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-202349684
• Uy, P. D., Nakagoshi, N. (2008). Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban greenspace planning in Hanoi, Vietnam. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(1), 25-40.
• Wang, Y., Jin, C., Lu, M., Lu, Y. (2017). Assessing the suitability of regional human settlements environment from a different preferences perspective: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China. Habitat International, 70, 1-12.
• Yaralıoğlu, K. (2001). Performans değerlendirmede analitik hiyerarşi proses. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 129-142.