The Integration in the Turkic World through Security Community Lenses

Öz

The geopolitical landscape of post-Soviet Eurasia has been shaped by the emergence of independent Turkic states and their evolving regional cooperation mechanisms. The Organization of Turkic States (OTS) has become a central platform for fostering diplomatic, economic, and security collaboration among its members. This study examines the potential of the OTS to develop into a pluralistic security community in Turkic World, where conflicts are addressed through institutionalized dialogue rather than force. Applying Adler and Barnett’s analytical framework, the research explores the presence of sustained mutual interests, shared cultural and political identities, and institutionalized communication as fundamental pillars of security community formation. This approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the organization’s role in shaping regional stability and integration. Ultimately, the study argues that the OTS exhibits key characteristics of an emerging pluralistic security community, offering a foundation for deeper regional cooperation and collective responses to shared security challenges in the Turkic World.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Identity
• integration
• security community
• Organization of Turkic States
• Turkic World

Güvenlik Topluluğu Merceğinden Türk Dünyası Entegrasyonu

Öz

Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasının ardından Avrasya’nın jeopolitik yapısı, bağımsızlıklarını kazanan Türk devletleri ve bunların gelişen bölgesel iş birliği mekanizmaları tarafından şekillendirilmiştir. Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı (TDT), üye devletler arasında diplomatik, ekonomik ve güvenlik iş birliğini güçlendiren merkezi bir platform hâline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, TDT’nin çoğulcu bir güvenlik topluluğuna dönüşme potansiyelini inceleyerek, çatışmaların kurumsallaşmış diyalog yoluyla çözümlendiği bir yapıya evrilme sürecini analiz etmektedir. Araştırma, Adler ve Barnett’in analitik çerçevesini temel alarak, güvenlik topluluğunun oluşumu için gerekli olan sürdürülebilir ortak çıkarlar, paylaşılan kültürel ve politik kimlikler ile kurumsallaşmış iletişim süreçlerini değerlendirmektedir. Bu yaklaşım, teşkilatın bölgesel istikrar ve entegrasyon üzerindeki rolüne dair kapsamlı bir anlayış sunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, çalışma, TDT’nin çoğulcu bir güvenlik topluluğunun temel niteliklerini giderek daha fazla sergilediğini ve Türk Dünyası’nda ortak güvenlik tehditlerine karşı kolektif yanıt mekanizmalarının güçlenmesine zemin hazırladığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kimlik
• entegrasyon
• güvenlik topluluğu
• Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı
• Türk Dünyası

Kaynakça

1. Adler, Emanuel. “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress.” Progress in Postwar International Relations, eds. Emanuel Adler, and Beverly Crawford, Columbia University Press, 1991, pp. 43–88.
2. Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett. “A Framework for the Study of Security Communities.” Security Communities, eds. Emanuel Adler, and Michael Barnett, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 13–47.
3. Ağır, Osman, and Zehra Aksu. “Efforts for Energy-Based Regionalisation in the Turkic World: The Organization of Turkic States.” bilig, no. 109, 2024, pp. 105–128.
4. Akıllı, Erman. “Turksoy, Turkic Council and Cultural Diplomacy.” bilig, no. 91, 2019, pp. 1–25.
5. Allison, Roy. “Regionalism, Regional Structures and Security Management in Central Asia.” International Affairs, vol. 80, no. 3, 2004, pp. 463–483.
6. Andican, A. Ahat. Değişim Sürecinde Türk Dünyası. Emre Yayınları, 1996.
7. Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1985, pp. 226–254.
8. Aydın, Merve Erkan, and Yi Liu. “Organization of Turkic States: Diverse Motivations for a Common Aim.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 35–54.

9. Aydogan, Merve. “Ready to Support Kazakhstan to Overcome Current Crisis: Organization of Turkic States.” Anadolu Agency, 11 Jan. 2022, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/ready-to-support- kazakhstan-to-overcomecurrent-crisis-organization-of-turkic-states/2470856.
10. Bekdil, Burak Ege. “Turkey, Kazakhstan Deepen Relations in Space Tech, Drone Production.” Defense News, 20 October 2022, https://www.defensenews.com/space/2022/10/20/turkey-kazakhstan- deepen-relations-in-space-techdrone-production/.
11. Bellamy, Alex J. Security Communities and Their Neighbours: Regional Fortresses or Global Integrators? Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
12. Beyrer, Chris. “The Golden Crescent and HIV/AIDS in Central Asia: Deadly interactions.” Global Public Health, vol. 6, no. 5, 2011, pp. 570–576.
13. British Petroleum. “Statistical Review of World Energy.” 2021.
14. British Petroleum. “bp Statistical Review of World Energy.” 2022.
15. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Basic Books, 1997.
16. Caporaso, James. “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations.” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 3, 1992, pp. 599–632.
17. Chandra, Yashasvi. “Illicit Drug Trafficking and Financing of Terrorism: The Case of Islamic State, Al Qaeda and Their Affiliate Groups.” Journal of Defence Studies, vol. 14, no. 1–2, Jan.–June 2020, pp. 69– 91.
18. Checkel, Jeffrey T. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization, vol. 59, no. 4, 2005, pp. 801–826.
19. Cho, Young C. “State Identity Formation in Constructivist Security Studies: A Suggestive Essay.” Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 13, no. 3, 2012, pp. 299-316.
20. Cirincione, Joseph, Jon B. Wolfsthal, and Miriam Rajkumar. Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005.
21. Demir, Can. “The Organization of Turkic States: Implications for the Balance of Power.” Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, TDT Özel Sayısı, 2022, pp. 39-71.
22. Deutsch, Karl W., et al. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton University Press, 1957.
23. Emtseva, Julia. “Small Conflicts with Big Impact: The Tajik-Kyrgyz War No One Talks About.” EJIL: Talk!, European Journal of International Law, 30 September 2022, https://www.ejiltalk.org/small- conflicts-with-big-impactthe-tajik-kyrgyz-war-no-one-talks-about/.
24. Erendor, Mehmet Emin, and Emre Çıtak. “Examining the Security Dimension of the Organization of Turkic States by Addressing Border Issues: Kyrgyz-Tajik Border Conflict.” bilig, no. 113, 2025, pp. 1–26.
25. Golden, Peter B. Central Asia in World History. Oxford University Press, 2011.
26. Görgülü, Aybars. “The Dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh: A Protracted Conflict.” Review of Armenian Studies, no. 25, May 2012, pp. 47–66.
27. Grieco, Joseph M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organizations, vol. 42, no. 3, 1988, pp. 485–507.
28. Guliyev, Farid. “Presidential Discourses on Regionalism in Azerbaijan: Turkic Solidarity and the Silk Road.” Nationalities Papers, 2024, p. 1–21.
29. Held, David, et al. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture. Stanford University Press, 1999.
30. Heng, Pek Koon. The ASEAN Way and Regional Security Cooperation in the South China Sea. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, 2014.
31. Herz, John H. “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma.” World Politics, vol. 2, no. 2, 1950, pp. 157–180.
32. International Crisis Group “Central Asia: Border Disputes and Conflict Potentials.” Asia Report, no. 33, 2002.
33. İpek, Cemil D., and Mehmet Ç. Güler. “The Origins of the Unity Idea in the Turkic World.” bilig, no. 105, 2023, pp. 129–158.
34. Jeenbekov, Sooronbay. “Deepening Cooperation between Member States of the Cooperation Council of Turkic Speaking Countries.” Turkic Council: 10th Anniversary of the Nakhchivan Agreement, Center of Analysis of International Relations, 2019, pp. 12–16.
35. Joldoshov, Altynbek. “Kimlik ve Sınır: Orta Asya’da Sınır Sorunları.” Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, 2019, pp. 303–326.
36. Karaeve, Zainiddin. “Border Disputes and Regional Integration in Central Asia.” Harvard Asia Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 4, 2005, pp. 1–4.
37. Kazantsev, Andrei. “Russian Policy in Central Asia and the Caspian Sea Region.” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 60, no. 6, 2008, pp. 1073–1088.
38. Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 1984.
39. Keohane, Robert O. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Routledge, 1989.
40. Kirchner, Emil. “The challenge of European Union security governance.” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 44, no. 5, 2006, pp. 947–968.
41. Koçak, Muhammet. “Potential of Organization of Turkic States in the International System: Promises and Vulnerabilities.” Insight Turkey, vol. 25, no. 4, Fall 2023, pp. 115–138.
42. Kun.uz. “Uzbekistan to Purchase Military Drones from Türkiye – Media.” Kun.uz, 29 January 2025, https://kun.uz/en/news/2025/01/29/uzbekistan-topurchase-military-drones-from-trkiye-media.
43. Mearsheimer, John J. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, 1994/1995, pp. 5–49.
44. Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton, 2001.
45. Minasyan, Nelli. “Turkish Initiatives in the Direction of Turkic Integration: Prerequisites and Tendencies.” Contemporary Eurasia, vol. 11, no. 5, 2022, p. 22–39.
46. Mirziyoyev, Shavkat. “New Opportunities for Integration and Cooperation.” Turkic Council: 10th Anniversary of the Nakhchivan Agreement, Center of Analysis of International Relations, 2019, pp. 20–24.
47. Molthof, Mieke. “ASEAN and the Principle of Non-Interference.” E-International Relations, 8 February 2012, https://www.e-ir.info/2012/02/08/asean-andthe-principle-of-non-interference/.
48. Mustofaev, Murodjon. “The Organization of Turkic States: A New Approach to Global and Regional Challenges.” Perceptions, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, pp. 105–120.
49. Nakhchivan Agreement. 2009, https://www.turkicstates.org/u/d/basic-documents/nakhchivan-agreement-on-the-establishment-of-the-copperation-councilof-turkic-speaking-states-1-en.pdf.
50. Nazarbayev, Nursultan. Kritik 10 Yıl. ASAM Yayınları, 2003.
51. OTS 8th Summit Declaration. 2021, https://turkicstates.org/u/d/basic-documents/eighth-summit-declaration-15-en.pdf.
52. OTS 9th Summit Declaration. 2022, https://turkicstates.org/u/d/basic-documents/ninth-summit-declarataion-16-en.pdf.
53. Ozat, Meray. “Turkish Drones to Draw Political Influences in the Caspian Region.” Caspian Policy Center, 31 July 2023, https://www.caspianpolicy.org/research/security-and-politics-program- spp/turkish-drones-to-drawpolitical-influences-in-the-caspian-region.
54. Plater-Zyberk, Henry, and Andrew Monaghan. Strategic Implications of the Evolving Shanghai Cooperation Organization. U.S. Army War College Press, 2014.
55. Purtaş, Fırat. “Türkiye and the Organization of Turkic States: A Strategic Partnership for Regional Integration.” Insight Turkey, vol. 27, no. 1, 2025, p. 116.
56. Rousseau, David L., and Thomas C. Walker. “Liberalism.” The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, eds. Myriam D. Cavelty, and Victor Mauer, Routledge, 2010, pp. 21–33.
57. Roy, Oliver. Yeni Orta Asya ya da Ulusların İmal Edilişi. Metis Yayınları, 1997.
58. Russett, Bruce. International Regions and the International System: A Study in Political Ecology. Rand McNally, 1967.
59. Russett, Bruce, and John Oneal. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
60. Sarı, Buğra. “Security Aspect of the Integration in Turkic World under the Organization of Turkic States.” Insight Turkey, vol. 25, no. 4, 2023, pp. 139–161.
61. Swanström, Niklas L. P. et al. A Strategic Conflict Analysis of Central Asia with a Focus on Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Swedish Development Cooperation Agency, 2005.
62. Toktomushev, Kemel. “Understanding Cross-Border Conflict in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Case of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.” Connections: The Quarterly Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018, pp. 21–41.
63. Topsakal, İlyas, and Alperen Kürşad Zengin. “Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı: Siyasi, Ekonomik ve Kültürel Çıktılar.” Kriter, no. 63, 2021.
64. Torun, Abdullah. “Bölgesel Hegemonyanın Bir Aracı Olarak Kolektif Güvenlik Antlaşması Örgütü.” Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları, vol. 9, no. 19, 2015, pp. 1–23.
65. Turkic Academy. “About the Academy.” https://turkicacademy.org/en/about/obakademii. Accessed 1 March 2025.
66. Turkic Council. “Statement of the Secretary General of the Turkic Council.” 28 September 2020, https://turkicstates.org/en/haberler/statement-of-the-secretary-general-of-the-turkic-council_2075? fbclid=IwAR3dBb6RPWxyGKIDTugYl8RbcRhpmpjanumrNx_PQqq39TPkYyx4PgSTjfk.
67. Turkic Council. “Statement of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Cooperation Council of Turkic Speaking States on the Situation in Afghanistan.” 27 September 2021, https://turkicstates.org/en/haberler/statement-of-thecouncil-of-foreign-ministers-of-the-coopertion-council-of-turkic-speakingstates-on-the-situation-in-aghanistan_2344.
68. Turkic Culture and Heritage Foundation. “History.” https://itchf.org/haqqimizda/tarix. Accessed 1 March 2025.
69. Turkic World 2040 Vision. 2021, https://turkicstates.org/u/d/haberler/turkicworld-vision-2040-2396-97.pdf.
70. Turkish National Police Academy. “FETÖ as an International Threat.” Report, no. 20, 2018.
71. TURKSOY. “History.” www.turksoy.org/en-US/history. Accessed 1 March 2025.
72. Tusicisny, Andrej. “Security Communities and Their Values: Taking Masses Seriously.” International Political Science Review, vol. 28, no. 4, 2007, pp. 425–449.
73. United Nations. “Illicit Drug Trends in Central Asia.” Office on Drugs and Crime Regional Office for Central Asia, 2008.
74. Walker, Justine. Understanding the Impact of Financial Sanctions on Humanitarian Crises: A Case Study of Afghanistan. PhD dissertation. University of St Andrews, 2008.
75. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley, 1979.
76. Weinstein, Adam. “Russian Phoenix: The Collective Security Treaty Organization.” The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, vol. 8, no. 1, 2007, pp. 167–179.
77. Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, Spring 1992, pp. 391–425.
78. Wendt, Alexander. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, June 1994, pp. 384–396.
79. Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1999.