Tarih, Kimlik ve Dış Politika: Rusya Federasyonu Güncel Tarih Ders Kitaplarında Osmanlı-Türk İmajı

Öz

Bu makale tarih eğitimi yoluyla kurulan kolektif inanç ve kimliğin uluslararası siyaseti ve dış politikayı anlamada kurucu bir öneme sahip olduğunu iddia etmektedir. Her ne kadar doksanlı yıllardan itibaren ders kitaplarının siyasetle ilişkisi önemli bir araştırma gündemi haline gelmiş olsa da, tarih eğitiminin ve tarihsel hafızanın uluslararası siyasetteki rolü hala yeterince çalışılmamış bir konudur.Bu makalede tarih ve kimlik arasındaki ilişki üzerinden giderek Rusya Federasyonu güncel tarih ders kitaplarında, Osmanlı-Türk imgesinin nasıl çizildiği analiz edilmektedir. İncelenen tarih ders kitapları göstermektedir ki Rusya federasyonunun kimliği, temelde Batı karşıtlığı üzerinden şekillenmektedir. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu/Türkiye bu kimlik anlatısında bağımsız bir aktör olarak resmedilmez, Batı’nın kendi çıkarları için harekete geçirdiği, desteklediği bir “maşa” olarak resmedilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dış politika, ulusal kimlik, tarih eğitimi, tarih ders kitapları, Rusya Federasyonu, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu, Türkiye

History, Identity and Foreign Policy: Ottoman-Turkish Image in the Current History Textbooks of the Russian Federation

Öz

This article argues that the collective belief and identity transmitted through history education has a constitutive significance for the understanding of foreign policy and international politics. While the relationship of school textbooks to politics has become a significant area of research, the role played by history education and historical memory in international politics still remains understudied. This paper presents, in the context of the interaction between history and identity, an analysis of the depiction of the Ottoman-Turk image in the history textbooks currently used in the Russian Federation. In the textbooks under scrutiny, the West emerges as the real Other in the construction of Russian national identity, in parallel with contemporary Russian foreign policy. The dominant Russian narrative depicts the West as an actor opposed to the strengthening of Russia. The Ottoman Empire/Turkey is described not as an independent actor in this relationship, but as a “stooge” always mobilized and supported by the West for its own interest.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Foreign Policy, national identity, history education, history textbooks, Russian Federation, Ottoman Empire, Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Agibalova, E. V. ve G. M. (2011). Donskoj. İstorija Srednih Vekov. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 6. Klass.
2. Altan Olcay, Özlem (2006). “Turkey: Sanctifying a Secular State”. Teaching Islam: Textbooks and Religion in the Middle East. Der. Eleanor Abdella Doumato ve Gregory Starrett. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pub.
3. Altbach, Philip G. (1991). “Textbooks: The International Dimension”. The Politics of the Textbook. Der. Michael Apple and Linda Christian-Smith. New York: Routledge. 242–258.
4. Apple, Michael ve Linda Christian-Smith (1991). The Politics of the Textbook. New York: Routledge.
5. Apple, Michael (1993). Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. London: Routledge.
6. Aydın, Mustafa (2004). “Uluslararası İlişkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği” Uluslararası İlişkiler 1: 33-60.
7. Bogolubov, Leonid N. v.d (1999). “The Challenge of Civic Education in the New Russia”. Civic Education Across Countries: Twenty-four National Case Studies from the IEA Civic Education Project. Der. Judith Torney-Putra, John Schwille ve Jo-Ann Amadeo. Amsterdam: IEA/ Eburon Pubishers. 523-545.
8. Buganov, V. İ., P. H. Zyrjanov and A. N. Saharov (2011). İstoriya Rossii: Konets XVII-XIX Vek. 10. Klass. Prosveščenija: Moskva. Campbell, David (1998). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Bloomington: University of Minnesota Press.

9. Canning, Mary v.d (1999). Russia. Regional Education Study. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Technical Paper, No 457.
10. Cole, Elizabeth A. and Judy Barsalou (2006). “Unite or Divide? The Challenges of Teaching History in Societies Emerging from Violent Conflict”. Haziran 2006. http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/15098/1/Unite%20or%20Divide%20The%20 Challenges%20of%20Teaching%20History%20in%20Societies%20Emerging%20from%20Violent%20Conflict.pdf?1, (Erişim Tarihi, 20 Mart 2007).
11. Colley, Linda (2002). Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven, CT: Yale.
12. Danilov, A. A. and L. G. Kosulina (2011). İstorija Rossii, Konets XVI-XVIII Vek. Moskva: Prosveščenija.
13. Danilov, A. A. and L. G. Kosulina (2011). İstorija Rossii: XIX Vek. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 8. Klass.
14. Danilova, Maria (2004). “Critics fear Russian history textbooks overlook Soviet crimes and repression”. 17 Ağustos 2004. http://www.sfgate. com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/08/16/international1420EDT0565.DTL (Erişim Tarihi, 15 Şubat 2012) .
15. Eklof, Ben (2005). “Russian Education: The Past in the Present”. Educational Reform in Post-Soviet Russia: Legacies and Prospects. Der. Ben Eklot ve Larry E. Holmes and Vera Kaplan. London, New York: Frank Cass/Routledge. 1-21.
16. Elder, Miriam (2010). “Ruling Russian party wants ‘united’ history textbook for schools”. 17 Haziran 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/ world/2010/jun/17/united-russia-uniform-history-textbook (Erişim Tarihi, 20 Mart 2012).
17. Erokhina, Marina and Alexander Shevyrev (2006). “Old Heritage and New Trends: School History Textbooks in Russia”. School History Textbooks Across Cultures. Der. Jason Nicholls. Oxford: Symposium Books.
18. European Council (2006). History Education in Europe: Ten Years of Cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Council of Europe. Strasbourg: European Council.
19. Finnemore, Martha ve Kathryn Sikkink (2001). “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics”. Annual Review of Political Science 4(1): 391-416.
20. Finnemore, Martha (1996). National Interests in International Society. New York: Cornell University Press.
21. Galtung, Johan (2001). ‘‘The Construction of National Identities for Cosmic Drama: Chosenness–Myths–Trauma (CMT) Syndromes and Cultural Pathologies’’ Handcuffed to History. Der. S. P. Udayakumar. Westport, CT: Praeger.
22. Gatina, Venera (2009). Rus Tarih Ders Kitaplarında Osmanlı/Türk İmgesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
23. Graney, Katherine E. (1999). “Education Reform in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan: Sovereignty Projects in Post-Soviet Russia”. Europe-Asia Studies 51(4): 611-639.
24. Hopf, Ted (2002). Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. London: Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
25. Ikenberry, G. John (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
26. Judobskaya, A. J. et al. (2011). Vseobšaja İstorija, İstorija Novogo Vremeni. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 7. Klass.
27. Kaplan, Vera (2005). “History Teaching in Post-Soviet Russia: Coping with Antithetical Traditions”. Educational Reform in Post-Soviet Russia: Legacies and Prospects. Der. Ben Eklot, Larry E. Holmes and Vera Kaplan. London, New York: Frank Cass/Routledge. 247–271.
28. Kaufman, Cathy C. (1984). “De-Sovietizing Educational Systems, Learning from Past Policy and Practice”. International Review of Education 40 (2): 149-158.
29. Levandovskij, A. A. (2011). İstorija Rossii: XVII-XIX Vekov. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 10. Klass.
30. Maier, Robert (2005). “Learning about Europe and the World: Schools, Teachers, and Textbooks in Russia after 1991”. The Nation, Europe, and the World: Textbooks and Curricula in Transition. Der. Hanna Schissler ve Yasemin Nuhoglu Soysal. Oxford: Berghahn Books. 138-163.
31. McLean, Martin and Natalia Voskrensenskaya. “Educational revolution from above: Thatcher’s Britain and Gorbachev’s Soviet Union”. Comparative Education Review (36)1: 71-90.
32. Mehlinger, Howard D. (1985). ‘‘International Textbook Revision: Examples From the United States”. Internationale Schulbuchforschung 7: 287–298.
33. Monagahan, Andrew (2008). “An Enemy at the Gates’ or ‘from Victory to Victory’? Russian Foreign Policy”. International Affairs 84: 717–733
34. Nikandrov, Nikolai D. (1995). “Russian Education after Perestroika: The Search for New Values”. International Review of Education 41(1/2): 47–57.
35. OECD (1998). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Russian Federation. Paris: OECD Yayınları.
36. Phillips, Robert (1998). History Teaching, Nationhood and the State; a Study in Educational Politics. London: Cassell.
37. Podeh, Elie (2000). “History and Memory in the Israeli Educational System: The Portrayal of the Arab-Israeli Conflict in History Textbooks (1948-2000)”. History & Memory 12(1): 65-100.
38. Šestokov, V. S. (2011). İstorija Rossii: XX – Načalo XXI Veka. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 11. Klass.
39. Smith, Anthony D. (1996). “Memory and Modernity: Reflections on Ernest Gellner’s Theory of Nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism 2(3): 371–388.
40. Soroko-Sjupa, O. C. and A. O. Soroko-Sjupa. Vseobšaja İstorija: Noveyšaja İstorija. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 11. Klass.
41. Telhami, Shibley ve Michael Barnett (2002). Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East. Ithaca, N.Y. and London: Cornell University.
42. The World Bank (1999). ‘Russia. Regional Education Study’. Report no. 18666-RU. Managing Unit: Human Development Sector Unit: Europe and Central Asia Region. 26 Temmuz 1999. 3.
43. Torsti, Pilvi (2007). “How to deal with a difficult past? History textbooks supporting enemy images in post war Bosnia and Herzegovina”. Journal of Curriculum Studies 39(1): 77-96.
44. Ukolova, V. İ. and A. V. Rebjakin (2011). Vseobšaja İstorija: S Drevnejših Vremen Do Kontsa XIX Veka. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 10. Klass.
45. Ülman, Burak, Evren Balta Paker ve Muhammed Ağcan (2011). “Uluslararası Fikri, Epistemolojik Yanılgı ve Eleştirel Gerçekçiliğin İmkânları”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi (8)30: 15-43.
46. Vedjuškin, V. A (2011). İstorija Srednih Vekov. Moskva: Prosveščenija. 6. Klass
47. Volkan, Vamik D. (1997). Bloodlines: From Ethnic Pride to Ethnic Terrorism. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
48. Wang, Zheng (2008). “National Humiliation, History Education, and the Politics of Historical Memory: Patriotic Education Campaign in China”. International Studies Quarterly (52): 783–806.
49. Weber, Eugen (1972). Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France. London: Chatto and Windus.
50. Weldes, Jutta (1999). “The Cultural Production of Crisis: U.S. Identity and Missiles in Cuba”. Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communites, and the Production of Danger. Der. Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson and Raymond Duvall. Minneapoliss: University of Minnesota Press. 35-63.
51. Wendt, Alexander (1992). “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics”. International Organization 46(2): 391-425.
52. _______________ (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. _______________ (2009). “Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramında Yapan Yapı Sorunu”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 6(23): 3-44.
54. Zajda, Joseph (2005) “The Politics of Rewriting History: New School History Textbooks in Russia”. The International Handbook of Globalisation and Education Policy Research. Der. Joseph Zajda. Dordrecht: Springer. 693-716.