Suriye Krizi’nde Türkiye ve İran Arasındaki Stratejik Etkileşim: 2011-2015 Zaman Diliminin Oyun Kuramsal Analizi

Öz

Suriye Krizi, Türkiye ve İran’ın Ortadoğu bölgesine dair çatışan stratejik çıkarlarını gün yüzüne çıkarmıştır. Nitekim Türkiye Suriye Krizi’ne dair Beşar Esad rejimine dair politikalar izlerken; İran Esad rejiminin iktidarda kalması için kaynaklarını seferber etmiştir. Türkiye ve İran’ın Suriye Krizi minvalinde çatışan bu politikaları iki ülkenin bölgesel hedefleriyle yakından ilişkilidir. Bu argüman temelinden yola çıkarak, eldeki çalışma Türkiye ve İran’ın bölgesel ihtiraslarını bağımsız değişken ve bu iki ülkenin Suriye Krizi’nde çatışan politikalarını bağımlı değişken olarak ele alarak bu iki değişken arasındaki neden-sonuç ilişkisini araştırmaktadır. Bundaki amaç Astana Süreci öncesi zaman dilimi olan 2011-2015 yılları arasında Türkiye ve İran’ın Suriye Krizi’nde izledikleri politikaların içerisinde bu iki ülkenin birbirleriyle çatışan bölgesel ihtirasların rolünü ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma bunu yaparken, neden-sonuç ilişkilerini sistematik biçimde gösterme imkânı sağlaması hasebiyle oyun kuramsal yaklaşımı araştırma yöntemi olarak kullanmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türkiye,İran,Suriye Krizi,Ortadoğu,Oyun Kuramsal Analiz,Tercih Sıralaması,Nash Dengesi

The Strategic Interaction between Turkey and Iran in the Syrian Crisis: A Game Theoretical Analysis of the Time Frame from 2011 to 2015

Öz

The Syrian crisis has revealed the clashing strategic interests of Turkey and Iran. The two states are pursuing opposite policies on the Syrian crisis to such an extent that Turkish regional policies concentrate on the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, whereas Iran devotes its resources to helping the regime stay in power. The reasons of these clashing policies are important that they reflect regional objectives of Turkey and Iran. In this respect, this study investigates the causal relationship between the regional ambitions of Turkey and Iran, as the independent variable, and the contradictory policies of these two countries in the Syrian crisis, as the dependent variable. By doing so, it aims to articulate the role of Turkish and Iranian regional ambitions by taking into account their clashing policies towards the Syrian crisis from 2011 to 2015, the time frame before the Astana Process. As of the methodology, this study applies game theoretical modeling because this methodology helps manifestation of a cause-and-effect relationship in a systematized way. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Turkey,Iran,Syrian Crisis,the Middle East,Game Theoretical Analysis,Preference Ordering,Nash Equilibrium

Kaynakça

1. Alakhbar English. “Khamenei to Assad: Full and Unlimited Support”. 08.05.2013. http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/15746 [Accessed 18.03.2015].
2. Altunışık, Meliha Benli (2010). “Turkey’s Changing Middle East Policy”. UNISCI Discussion Papers (23): 149-162.
3. Aras, Bülent (2003). “Turkey’s Relations with Iran in the Post- Cold War Era”. Turkish Foreign Policy in the 21st Century: A Changing Role in World Politics. Eds. Tareq Y. Ismael and Mustafa Aydın. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
4. Aras, Bülent (2006). “Türk-İran İlişkileri: Değişim ve Süreklilik”. Avrasya Dosyası 12 (2): 61-92.
5. Aras, Bülent and Akpınar, Pınar (2011). “Türk Dış Politikasında Davutoğlu Dönemi: 2009 Değerlendirmesi”. Türk Dış Politikası Yıllığı 2009. Eds. Burhanettin Duran, Kemal İnat and Muhittin Ataman. Ankara: SETA Yay.
6. Bartell, Dawn L. (2012). “Conflict in Syria and the Opportunity to Reduce Iran’s Regional Influence and Iran’s Threat to the International Community”. Global Security Studies 3 (4): 136-147.
7. Barzegar, Kayhan (2008). “Iran and the Shiite Crescent: Myths and Realities”. Brown Journal of World Affairs 15 (1): 87-99.
8. Bennet, Peter G. (1995). “Modelling Decisions in IR: Game Theory and Beyond”. Mershon International Studies Review 39 (1): 19-52.

9. Calabrese, John (1998). “Turkey and Iran: Limits of a Stable Relationship”. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 25 (1): 75-94.
10. CBN News (2011). “Iran Fanning Islam’s Messianic Hopes?”. http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/March/Iran-Fanning-Islams-Messianic- Hopes/ [Accessed 29.01.2015].
11. Çağatay, Soner (2011). “Turkish-Iranian Rivalry Redux”. The Washington Institute. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/turkish-iranian-rivalry-redux [Accessed 14.03.2015].
12. Çetinsaya, Gökhan (2003). “Essential Friends and Natural Enemies: The Historic Roots of Turkish Iranian Relations”. Middle East Review of International Affairs 7 (3): 116-132.
13. Çetinsaya, Gökhan (2004). “Türk-İran İlişkileri”. Türk Dış Politikasının Analizi. Ed. Faruk Sönmezoğlu. İstanbul: Der Yay. Davutoğlu, Ahmet (2011). Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye”nin Uluslararası Konumu. İstanbul: Küre Yay.
14. Demiryol, Tolga (2013). “The Limits to Cooperation Between Rivals: Turkish-Iranian Relations Since 2002”. Ortadoğu Etüdleri 3 (2): 111-144.
15. Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View”. Handbook of International Relations. Eds. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE Publications.
16. Gelbart, Jonathan (2010). “The Iran- Syria Axis: A Critical Investigation”. Stanford Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 36-42.
17. Goodarzi, Jubin M. (2013). “Syria and Iran: Alliance Cooperation in a Changing Regional Environment”. Ortadoğu Etüdleri 3 (2): 31-54.
18. Grieco, Joseph M. (1998). “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism”. International Organization 42 (3).
19. Güner, Serdar (2003). “Oyun Kuramı ve Uluslararası Politika”. METU Studies in Development 30 (2): 163-180.
20. Güner, Serdar (2012). “A Short Note on the Use of Game Theory in Analyses of International Relations”. E-International Relations http://www.e-ir.info/2012/06/21/a-short-note-on-the-use-of-game-theory-in-analyses-of-international-relations/ [Accessed 14.12.2014].
21. Günter, Micheal M. (1998). “Turkey and Iran Face off in Kurdistan”. Middle East Quarterly 5 (1). http://www.meforum.org/384/turkey-and-iran-face-off-inkurdistan [Accessed 25.01.2015].
22. Hurriyet (04.02.2013). “Davutoğlu: Tek Yol Esad’ın Gitmesi”. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/planet/22517205.asp [Accessed 25.04.2015]. Israel National News. “Khamenei: Syria’s Anti- Israel, So We’ll Defend It”. 30.03.2012.http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/154314#. UexUD430GaQ [Accessed 18.03.2015].
23. Jenkins, Gareth H. (2012). “Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations with Iran”. Silk Road Paper.
24. Kaplan, Morton (1957). System and Process in International Politics. New York: Wiley and Sons.
25. Kardaş, Şaban (2012). “Turkey’s Syria Policy: The Challenge of Coalition Building”. The German Marshall Fund on Turkey Series.
26. Keskin, Arif (2009). “İran-Türkiye İlişkilerine Genel Bir Bakış”. 21. Yüzyıl Dergisi 12: 45-54.
27. King, Gary, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Kurki, Milja and Colin Wight (2010). “International Relations and Social Science”. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Eds. Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Larrabee, F. Stephen and Alireza Nader (2013). “Turkey-Iranian Relations in a Changing Middle East”. RAND Cooperation Research Report Series.
30. Lichbach, Mark I. (2006). Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science?. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
31. Martin, Brian (1978). “The Selective Usefulness of Game Theory”. Social Studies of Science 8 (1): 85-110.
32. McCurdy, Daphne (2008). “Turkish-Iranian Relations: When Opposites Attract”. Turkish Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 87-106.
33. Miş, Nebi. “Suriye 2007”. Ortadoğu Yıllığı 2007. Eds. Kemal İnat, Muhittin Ataman ve Murat Yeşiltaş. İstanbul: KüreYay.
34. Mohammed, Idrees (2011). “Turkey and Iran Rivalry on Syria”. Alternatives 10 (2-3): 87-99.
35. Oktav, Özden Zeynep (2003). “Water Dispute and Kurdish Separatism in TurkishSyrian Relations”. The Turkish Yearbook 34: 91-117.
36. Pappalardo, Massimo (2008). “Multiobjective Optimization: A Brief Overview”. Pareto Optimality, Game Theory and Equilibria. Eds. Altannar Chinchuluun et al. New York: Springer Science-Business Media.
37. Pope, Hugh (2013). “Turkey’s Tangled Syria Policy”. CTC Sentinel 6 (8): 4-9.
38. Powell, Robert (1996). “The Modeling Enterprise and Security Studies”. International Security 24 (2): 97-116.
39. Sabah. “Erdoğan’dan Kahire’de Tarihi Konuşma”. 13.09.2011. http://www.sabah.com.tr/Gundem/2011/09/13/erdogan-kahirede-konusuyor [Accessed 03.02.2015].
40. Sandıklı, Atilla ve Ali Semin (2014). “Bütün Boyutlarıyla Suriye Krizi ve Türkiye”. Ortadoğu’da Değişim ve Türkiye. Eds. Atilla Sandıklı ve Erderm Kaya. İstanbul: Bilgesam Yay.
41. Sarı, Buğra (2012). Türk Dış Politikasında Stratejik Derinlik Yaklaşımına Dair Teorik ve Pratik Uyumun Suriye Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi. M.A. Thesis. Ankara: Gazi University.
42. Satloff, Robert (2011). “Iran and Syria. Next Steps”. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/html/pdf/SatloffTestimony20110623.pdf [Accessed 13.03.2015].
43. Sethi, Rajiw (2008). “Nash Equilibrium”. International Encylopedia of the Social Sciences (5). Ed. William A. Darity. Farmington Hills: Macmillan Social Science Library.
44. Sinkaya, Bayram (2012). “Rationalization of Turkey- Iran Relations: Prospects and Limits”. Insight Turkey 14 (2): 137-156.
45. Smyth, Philip (2015). The Shiite Jihad in Syria and Its Regional Effects. Washington: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Star. “İran’dan Türkiye’ye Şok Suçlama”. 05.04.2013. http://haber.stargazete.com/dunya/irandan-turkiyeye-sok-suclama/haber-742426 [Accessed 19.03.2015].
46. Stein, Arthur A. (1999). “The Limits of Strategic Choice: Constrained Rationality and Incomplete Explanation”. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Eds. David A. Lake and Robert Powell New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
47. Stein, Aaron and Philipp C. Bleek (2012). “Turkish-Iranian Relations: From Friends with Benefits to It’s Complicated”. Insight Turkey 14 (4): 137-150.
48. Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2006). “Game Theory Approaches”. Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Ed. Jennifer Sterling-Folker London: Lynne Eienner Publishers. The Jerusalem Post. “Khamenei Aide: Topplling Assad ‘Red Line’ for Iran”. 20.01.2013.http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Khamenei-aide-Toppling-As-sad-red-line-for-Iran [Accessed 18.03.2015].
49. Turkey Statistic Institute (/a). http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist [Accessed 19.11.2014].
50. Turkey Statistic Institute (/b). http://tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?tb_id=12&ust_id=4 [Accessed 19.11.2014].
51. Turocy, Theodore L. and Bernhard von Stengel (2001). “Game Theory”. CDAM Research Report LSE- CDAM- 2001-09.
52. Tür, Özlem (2011). “2000’lerde Türkiye-Suriye İlişkilerinin Siyasi-Ekonomisi”. Ortadoğu Analiz 3 (31): 33-39.
53. Tür, Özlem (2010). “Turkish- Syrian Relations- Where are We Going?”. UNISCI Discussion Papers 23: 163-176. Uygur, Hakkı (2012). “İran ve Arap Baharı”. SETA Analiz 52.
54. YeniŞafak. “İran Türkiye’yi Suçladı”. 07.08.2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/Gundem/?i=400635 [Accessed 04.02.2015].