Araştırma Makalesi

Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia

Sayı: 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI) 20 Ocak 2021
  • Şaban Halis Çalış
PDF İndir
TR EN

Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia

Öz

The aim of this article is to analyse the reasons behind continuity and change in Turkey’s relations with Russia and to question the limits of cooperation between the two nations by using historical and current developments as cases. The article proposes that it would be misleading to take into account certain recent cooperation points only, for instance in Syria, in order to reach for a better understanding about the nature of the relations. Instead, any attempt to understand the reasons for continuity and change in Turkey’s relations with Russia necessitates a framework built on conceptual and historical materials, as well as an analysis of conjunctural developments. Indeed, the history of the relations with Russia goes back to the emergence of the Russians in Euro-Asian region, but the relationship cannot be analysed without first understanding the mutual ontological concerns that both nations have had for centuries. As the Turks played an important role as the other in the construction of a Russian national identity, the rise of a Russian state in Euro-Asia became possible, to a great extent, with the decline of the Turks in this same region. The manuscript concludes that this historical reality that created a deep ontological concern particularly in Turkey still has the potential for renewed conflicts, despite of some recent cooperation with Moscow.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Acar, Kezban (2007). “Russo-Turkish War of 1877-78 and Its Implications on Russian National Identity”. The Ottoman-Russian War of 1877-78. Ed. Ömer Turan. Ankara: TDV Yay.
  2. Acar, Kezban (2019). “Kırım Savaşı (1853-56) Döneminde Propoganda: Rus Popüler Kültüründe Savaş ve Düşman İmgesi". Bilig (88): 113-136.
  3. Akarslan, Mediha (1995). “1920-1921 Yıllarında Rusya Hariciye Komiserliği ile Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi TBMM Arasında Kurulan İletişim”. Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu Dergisi 4 (16): 467-490.
  4. Alhas, Ali Murat and Sibel Morrow (2019). “Russian envoy killed to sabotage Turkish ties”. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/russian-envoy-killed-tosabotage-turkish-ties- expert/1678128, 19.12.2019, (Accessed: 21 January 2020).
  5. Armaoğlu, Fahir (2002). 20. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi. İstanbul: Alkım Yay.
  6. Aslan, Yavuz (2002). Mustafa Kemal-Frunze Görüşmeleri Türk-Sovyet İlişkilerinde Zirve. İstanbul: Kaynak Yay.
  7. Avundukluoğlu, Emin (2020). “Turkey: Russia ties review urged over Assad attacks”. 11 February 2020, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/turkey-russia-tiesreview-urged- over-assad-attacks/1730504 (Accessed: 19 March 2020).
  8. Benhür, Çağatay (2008). “1920’li Yıllarda Türk-Sovyet İlişkileri: Kronolojik Bir Çalışma”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi (24): 277-313.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Şaban Halis Çalış Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-6360-3787
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Ocak 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Kasım 2020

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Sayı: 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI)

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çalış, Ş. H. (2021). Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia. Bilig, 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI), 177-205. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9607
AMA
1.Çalış ŞH. Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia. Bilig. 2021;(96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI):177-205. doi:10.12995/bilig.9607
Chicago
Çalış, Şaban Halis. 2021. “Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia”. Bilig, sy 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI): 177-205. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9607.
EndNote
Çalış ŞH (01 Ocak 2021) Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia. Bilig 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI) 177–205.
IEEE
[1]Ş. H. Çalış, “Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia”, Bilig, sy 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI), ss. 177–205, Oca. 2021, doi: 10.12995/bilig.9607.
ISNAD
Çalış, Şaban Halis. “Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia”. Bilig. 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI) (01 Ocak 2021): 177-205. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9607.
JAMA
1.Çalış ŞH. Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia. Bilig. 2021;:177–205.
MLA
Çalış, Şaban Halis. “Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia”. Bilig, sy 96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI), Ocak 2021, ss. 177-05, doi:10.12995/bilig.9607.
Vancouver
1.Şaban Halis Çalış. Ontological Concerns, Historical Realities and Conjunctural Developments: Continuity and Change in Turkey’s Relations with Russia. Bilig. 01 Ocak 2021;(96 (TBMM’NİN 100. YILI ÖZEL SAYISI):177-205. doi:10.12995/bilig.9607

Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Mütevelli Heyet Başkanlığı