Reel Politika ve Cihad: Necmeddin İlgazi’nin Erken Dönem Haçlı Devletleri ile İlişkileri

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 69, 263 - 296, 01.12.2014

Selim Tezcan

Öz

Bu çalışma, Mardin ve Halep’in Artuklu emiri Necmeddin İlgazi’nin Haçlı devletlerine karşı politikalarını değerlendirmektedir. Literatürde İlgazi’ye çoğunlukla hasbelkader Antakya Haçlılarına karşı bir zafer kazandıktan sonra bu büyük fırsatı kaçırmış, geri kalan zamanını ikincil önemde işler ve maceralarla boşa geçirmiş bir emir gözüyle bakılmaktadır. Diğer yandan da gerek bu nedenle, gerekse de Haçlılarla işbirliğini de içeren, kendi menfaat ve bağımsızlığını muhafazaya dönük politikası nedeniyle yaptığının cihad olduğu reddedilmektedir. Bu çalışmada önce olayların üzerinden giderek emirin stratejilerinin baştan sona tutarlı ve belli pratik hedeflere dönük olduğu, Antakya’yı almaya teşebbüs etmemesinin de vizyonsuzluktan ziyade akılcı bir stratejiden kaynaklandığı gösterilmektedir. Makalenin ikinci kısmındaysa İlgazi her ne kadar pratik ve çıkarlarını gözeten bir politika izlemiş ve yeri geldikçe Haçlılarla işbirliği yapmış olsa da onlarla çatışmalarını yine de cihad olarak görmüş ve göstermiş olabileceği sergilenmekte, asıl onun ve izleyicisi Türkmenlerin kendi yaptıklarına ne gözle baktığının önemli olduğu vurgulanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İlgazi, Artuklular, Mardin, Halep, Haçlılar, Haçlı Devletleri, cihad, gaza

Realpolitik and Jihād: Najm al-Dīn Ilghāzī’s Relations with the Early Crusader States

Öz

This study evaluates the policies of the Artukid emir of Mardin and Aleppo, Najm al-Dīn Ilghāzī, against the Crusader states. In the literature, Ilghāzī is commonly regarded as an emir who won a victory against the Franks of Antioch, but then wasted the golden opportunity to take it for lack of vision. On the other hand, on account of this policy that was directed at preserving his interests and included collaborating with Franks, it is rejected that his clashes with them could be regarded as jihād. This study first shows that the emir’s strategies were consistent and directed at certain practical aims from the start, and that his “failure” to attempt taking Antioch stemmed from a judicious strategy. The second part argues that although Ilghāzī thus applied a pragmatic policy and sometimes collaborated with the Franks, this did not necessarily prevent him from regarding his clashes with them as jihād

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ilghāzī, Artukids, Mardin, Aleppo, Franks, Crusader States, jihād, ghazā

Kaynakça

• Al-ʿAẓīmī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAli (1988). Azimî tarihi: Selçuklular Dönemiyle İlgili Bölümler, H.430-538. Edited and translated by Ali Sevim, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
• Albert of Aachen (2007). Historia Ierosolimitana: History of the Journey to Jerusalem. Edited and translated by Susan B. Edgington, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Anonymous Syriac (1933). “The First and Second Crusades from an Anonymous Syriac Chronicle.” Translated by M.A.S. Tritton, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 92: 69-101, 273-305.
• Bar Hebraeus (1982). Abu'l-Farac Tarihi. Translated by Ömer Rıza Doğrul, 2 vols., Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
• Dānişmend-nāme (2002). Prepared and edited by Necati Demir, 4 vols., Boston: The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University.
• Fulcher of Chartres (1969). A History of the Expedition to Jerusalem, 1095-1127. Translated by Frances Rita Ryan, Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
• Ibn al-ʿAdīm, Kamāl al-Dīn Abū’l-Qāsim ʿUmar (1884). Zubdat al-Ḥalab fī Tārīkh Ḥalab, Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, Historiens Orientaux, vol. 3, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
• Ibn al-Athīr, ʿIzz al-Dīn abū’l-Ḥusain ʿAli (2006). The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir for the Crusading Period from al-Kāmil fī’l-ta’rīkh. Translated by D.S. Richards, 3 vols., Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Ibn al-Azraq, Aḥmad Yūsuf ibn ʿAli al-Fāriqī (1990). A Muslim Principality in Crusader Times: the Early Artukid State (Tārīkh Mayyāfāriqīn wa Āmid). Edited and translated by Carole Hillenbrand, İstanbul: Isis Press.
• Ibn al-Furāt, Nāṣir al-Dīn Muḥammad. Tārīkh al-duwal wa’l-mulūk. Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Vienna, Ms. A.F. 118 (Flügel 814, II).
• Ibn Munqidh, Usāma (1987). An Arab-Syrian Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of the Crusades. Translated by Philip Hitti, London: I.B. Taurius & Co.
• Ibn al-Qalānisī, Ḥamza ibn Asad abū Yaʿlā (1932). The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades. Translated by H.A.R. Gibb, London: Luzac & Co.
• Matthew of Edessa (1993). Armenia and the Crusades, Tenth to Twelfth Centuries: The Chronicle of Matthew of Edessa. Translated by Ara Edmond Dostourian, Lanham: University Press of America.
• Melikoff, Irène (1960). La geste de Melik Dānishmend: Etude critique du Dānishmendnāme, 2 vols., Paris: Librairie Adrien Maison.
• Michael the Syrian (1899-1910). Chronique de Michel le Syrien, patriarche jacobite d'Antioche (1166-1199). Edited and translated by J.B. Chabot, 3 vols., Paris: Ernest Leroux.
• Orderic Vitalis (1978). The Ecclesiastical History. Edited and translated by Marjorie Chibnall, 6 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Walter the Chancellor (1999). The Antiochene Wars. Translated by T. S. Asbridge and S. B. Edgington, Aldershot: Ashgate.
• William of Tyre (1943). A History of Deeds Done Beyond the Sea. Translated by E.A. Babcock and A.C. Krey, 2 vols., New York: Columbia University Press.
• Asbridge, Thomas (1997). “The Significance and Causes of The Battle of The Field of Blood.” Journal of Medieval History 23: 301-16.
• Asbridge, Thomas (2000). The Creation of the Principality of Antioch, 1098-1130. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
• Cahen, Claude (1935). “Le Diyār Bakr au temps des premiers Urtukids.” Journal Asiatique 227: 219-76.
• Cahen, Claude (1940). La Syrie du nord à l'époque de croisades et la principauté franque d’Antioche. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.
• Cahen, Claude (1969). “The Turkish Invasion: the Selchükids”. A History of the Crusades. Edited by Kenneth M. Setton, Second Edition, I, 135-176, Wisconsin: Wisconsin University Press.
• Cahen, Claude (1995). “Artukids.” Encyclopedia of Islam. Second Edition. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
• Darling, Linda T. (2000). “Contested Territory: Ottoman Holy War in Comparative Context”. Studia Islamica 91: 133-163.
• Darling, Linda T. (2011). “Reformulating the Gazi Narrative: When was the Ottoman State a Gazi State?” Turcica 43: 13-53.
• Elisséeff, Nikita (1967). Nur ad-Din: un grand prince musulman de Syrie au temps de croisades. 3 vols., Damas: Institut Français de Damas.
• Gibb, Hamilton A. R. (1969). “Zengi and the Fall of Edessa”. A History of the Crusades. Edited by Kenneth M. Setton, Second Edition, I, 449-462, Wisconsin: University Press.
• Grousset, René (1934-36). Histoire des croisades et du royaume franc de Jérusalem. 3 vols., Paris: Libraire Plon.
• Hillenbrand, Carole (1981). “The Career of Najm al-Dīn İl-Ghāzī”. Der Islam, 58: 250-92.
• Hillenbrand, Carole (1999). The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Imber, Colin (2000). “What does Ghāzī Actually Mean?” The Balance of Truth: Essays in Honour of Professor Geoffrey Lewis. Edited by Çiğdem BalimHarding and Colin Imber, İstanbul: Isis Press.
• İnalcık, Halil (1980). “The Question of the Emergence of the Ottoman State”. International Journal of Turkish Studies 2: 71-79.
• Jennings, Ronald C. (1986). “Some Thoughts on the Ghāzī-Thesis”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 76: 151-61.
• Kafadar, Cemal (1995). Between Two Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Kafesoğlu, İbrahim (1953). Sultan Melikşah Devrinde Büyük Selçuklu İmparatorluğu. İstanbul: Osman Yalçın Matbaası, 1953.
• Káldy-Nagy, Gyula (1979-80). “The Holy War (jihād) in the First Centuries of the Ottoman Empire”. Harvard Ukranian Studies 3/4: 467-73.
• Kayhan, Hüseyin (2008). “Artuklu-Danişmendli İlişkileri Hakkında”. Belleten LXXII: 475-481.
• Khalīl, ʿImād al-Dīn (1980). Al-imārāt al-Artuqiyya fī’l-Jazīra wa’l-Shām. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla.
• Köhler, Michael (1991). Allianzen und Verträge zwischen fränkischen und islamischen Herrschern im Vorderen Orient: Eine Studie über das zwischenstaatliche Zusammenleben vom 12. bis ins 13. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Köprülü, M. Fuad (1943). “Anadolu Selçuklu tarihinin Yerli Kaynakları”. Belleten VII (1943): 379-522.
• Köprülü, M. Fuad (1963). “Eski Türkler’de Kahramanlık Hayatı ve Anʿaneleri: Alp – Alplar Devri”. W. Barthold, İslâm Medeniyeti Tarihi. Edited with explanations, corrections and additions by M. Fuad Köprülü, Second Edition, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
• Köprülü, M. Fuad (1992). The Origins of the Ottoman Empire. Translated and edited by Gary Leiser, New York: State University of New York Press.
• Lindner, Rudi Paul (1983). Nomads and Ottomans in Medieval Anatolia. Bloomington: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies.
• Lowry, Heath (2003). The Nature of the Early Ottoman State. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Nicholson, Robert L. (1969). “The Growth of the Latin States, 1118-1144”. A History of the Crusades. Edited by Kenneth M. Setton, Second Edition, I, 410-448, Wisconsin: Wisconsin University Press.
• Noth, Albrecht (1986). “Heiliger Kampf (Ğihad) gegen die ‘Franken’: Zur Position der Kreuzzüge im Rahmen der Islamgescichte”. Saeculum 37: 240-259.
• Richards, D.S (1995). “Saladin”. Encyclopedia of Islam, Second Edition, Lediden: E. J. Brill.
• Runciman, Steven (1965). A History of the Crusades. 3 vols., Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Sevim, Ali (1962a). “Artuklular'ın Soyu ve Artuk Bey'in Siyasi Faaliyetleri”. Belleten XXVI: 121-46.
• Sevim, Ali (1962b). “Artuk Oğlu İlgazi”. Belleten XXVI: 649-91.
• Sivan, Emmanuel (1968). L’Islam et le croisade: idéologie et propagande dans réactions musulmanes aux croisades. Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient.
• Stevenson, William Barron (1907). Crusaders in the East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Süssheim, Karl (1960). “Ilghāzī”. Encyclopedia of Islam. Second Edition. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
• Tekin, Şinasi (1993a). “Türk Dünyasında Gazâ ve Cihâd Kavramları Üzerine Düşünceler”. Tarih ve Toplum 19: 9-18.
• Tekin, Şinasi (1993b). “Türk Dunyasında Gazâ ve Cihâd Kavramları Üzerine Düşünceler, II: Gâzi Teriminin Anadolu ile Akdeniz Bölgesinde İtibarını Yeniden Kazanması”. Tarih ve Toplum 19 (1993): 73-80.
• Turan, Osman (2006). Doğu Anadolu Türk Devletleri Tarihi. 6. Basım. İstanbul: Ötüken.
• Usta, Aydın (2002a). “Artuklular ve Haçlılar, Haçlıların Bölgeye Gelişlerinden Belek’in Ölümüne Kadar (1098-1124)”. İÜ Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Dergisi, 37: 355-374.
• Usta, Aydın (2002b). “Artuklular”. Türkler VI. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yay. 471-481.
• Väth, Gerhard (1987). Die Geschichte der artukidischen Fürstentümer in Syrien und der Ğazira’l-Furatiya. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.
• Wittek, Paul (2012). The Rise of the Ottoman Empire: Studies in the History of Turkey, Thirteenth-fifteenth Centuries. Edited by Colin Heywood, New York: Routledge.
• Yinanç, Mükrimin Halil (1944). Türkiye Tarihi Selçuklular Devri: Anadolu’nun Fethi. İstanbul: Bürhaneddin Matbaası.