BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Aile Siyasi Etkisini Kaybetmekte midir? Siyasi Parti Tercihinde Nesiller Arası Değişim

Yıl 2005, Sayı: 32, 109 - 124, 01.06.2005

Öz

Aile, siyasal sosyalizasyon sürecinin en etkili kurumlardan biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Hatta, bireyin siyasal tutum ve davranışlarının temelinin önemli ölçüde aile tarafından atıldığı öne sürülmektedir. Siyasal bilim literatüründe çocuğun özellikle siyasal parti tercihlerinin belirlenmesinde ailenin belirleyici rol oynadığı belirtilmektedir. Söz konusu varsayımlardan hareketle, ailenin otorite yapısının yanı sıra, siyasal katılma düzeyi ve seçimlere katılma isteğinin çocuğun siyasal davranışları üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Aynı zamanda çocuğun siyasal tercihi üzerinde etkili ebeveynler arasında birtakım karşılaştırmalara da yer verilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Alkan, Türker (1979), Siyasal Toplumsallaşma, Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  • ____________(1989), Siyasal Bilinç Ve Toplumsal Değişim, Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Davies, James C. (1970), “The Family’s Role in Political Socialization” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 108-118.
  • Dhaher, Ahmad J. (1987), “Culture and Politics in the Arab Gulf States” in Political Socialization in the Arab States, (Eds.) Tawfic E. Farah and Yasumasa Kuroda, Boulder & Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.: 65-76.
  • Epstein, A.S. & Evans J. (1980), “Parent-Child Interaction and Children’s Learning High/Scope” Psychological Abstracts, 64 (3): 570-590.
  • Farah, Tawfic E. & Al-Salem, Faisal, S.A. (1987), “Political Efficacy, Political Trust and the Action Orientations of University Students in Kuwait”, in Political Socialization in the Arab States, (Eds.) Tawfic E. Farah and Yasumasa Kuroda, Boulder & Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.: 21-33.
  • Gamble, John K., Irwin, Zachary T., Redenius, Charles M., Weber, James (1992), Introduction to Political Science, New Jersey: Prentice Hall,
  • Glass, Jennifer & Bengtson, Vern L. (1986), “Attitude Similarity In ThreeGeneration Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance or Reciprocal Influence”, American Sociological Review, 51: 685-698.
  • Hyman, Herbert (1959), Political Socialization, A Study in The Psychology of Political Behavior, USA: The Free Press.
  • Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin ve Sarıbay, A. Yaşar (2000), “İlkokul Çocuklarının Parti Tutmasını Belirleyen Etkenler”, in Türkiye’de Politik Değişim ve Modernleşme (Eds.) E. Kalaycıoğlu-A.Y. Sarıbay, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları: 413- 423.
  • Kavanagh, Dennish (1983), Political Science and Political Behaviour, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  • Kışlalı, A. Taner (1992), Siyaset Bilimi (Giriş), Ankara: İmge Yayınları Lane, Robert E. (1970), “Father and Sons: Foundations of Political Belief” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S.Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 119-131.
  • Levin, Martin L. (1970), “Social Climates and Political Socialization” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 353-362.
  • Middleton, Russell & Putney, Snell (1970), “Political Expression of Adolescent Rebellion” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 132-141.
  • Pinner, Frank A. (1970), “Parental Overprotection and Political Distrust”, in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: pp. 204-216.
  • Schochet, Gordon J. (1975), The Authoritian Family and Political Attitudes in 17th Century England Patriarchalism in Political Thought, London: Oxford Press.
  • Türkkahraman, Mimar (2000), Türkiye’de Siyasal Sosyalleşme ve Siyasal Sembolizm, İstanbul: Birey Yayınları.
  • Verba, Sidney (1961), Small Groups and Political Behaviour, A Study of Leadership, New Jersey: Princeton University Pres

Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification

Yıl 2005, Sayı: 32, 109 - 124, 01.06.2005

Öz

Family is accepted to be one of the most influential institutions of political socialization. Even, it is claimed that family forms the base of individual’s political attitudes and behaviours. In the literature of the science of policy, family is specified to play a determinative role, particularly, in child’s political party preference. With this assumption, in this study, the effect of family’s authority structure, political participation level and voting will on children political behaviours were investigated. At the same time, some comparisons were given between parents who are influential on child’s political behaviours

Kaynakça

  • Alkan, Türker (1979), Siyasal Toplumsallaşma, Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  • ____________(1989), Siyasal Bilinç Ve Toplumsal Değişim, Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Davies, James C. (1970), “The Family’s Role in Political Socialization” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 108-118.
  • Dhaher, Ahmad J. (1987), “Culture and Politics in the Arab Gulf States” in Political Socialization in the Arab States, (Eds.) Tawfic E. Farah and Yasumasa Kuroda, Boulder & Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.: 65-76.
  • Epstein, A.S. & Evans J. (1980), “Parent-Child Interaction and Children’s Learning High/Scope” Psychological Abstracts, 64 (3): 570-590.
  • Farah, Tawfic E. & Al-Salem, Faisal, S.A. (1987), “Political Efficacy, Political Trust and the Action Orientations of University Students in Kuwait”, in Political Socialization in the Arab States, (Eds.) Tawfic E. Farah and Yasumasa Kuroda, Boulder & Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.: 21-33.
  • Gamble, John K., Irwin, Zachary T., Redenius, Charles M., Weber, James (1992), Introduction to Political Science, New Jersey: Prentice Hall,
  • Glass, Jennifer & Bengtson, Vern L. (1986), “Attitude Similarity In ThreeGeneration Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance or Reciprocal Influence”, American Sociological Review, 51: 685-698.
  • Hyman, Herbert (1959), Political Socialization, A Study in The Psychology of Political Behavior, USA: The Free Press.
  • Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin ve Sarıbay, A. Yaşar (2000), “İlkokul Çocuklarının Parti Tutmasını Belirleyen Etkenler”, in Türkiye’de Politik Değişim ve Modernleşme (Eds.) E. Kalaycıoğlu-A.Y. Sarıbay, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları: 413- 423.
  • Kavanagh, Dennish (1983), Political Science and Political Behaviour, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  • Kışlalı, A. Taner (1992), Siyaset Bilimi (Giriş), Ankara: İmge Yayınları Lane, Robert E. (1970), “Father and Sons: Foundations of Political Belief” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S.Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 119-131.
  • Levin, Martin L. (1970), “Social Climates and Political Socialization” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 353-362.
  • Middleton, Russell & Putney, Snell (1970), “Political Expression of Adolescent Rebellion” in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: 132-141.
  • Pinner, Frank A. (1970), “Parental Overprotection and Political Distrust”, in Learning About Politics, A Reader in Political Socialization, (Ed.) Roberta S. Sigel, New York: Random House Inc.: pp. 204-216.
  • Schochet, Gordon J. (1975), The Authoritian Family and Political Attitudes in 17th Century England Patriarchalism in Political Thought, London: Oxford Press.
  • Türkkahraman, Mimar (2000), Türkiye’de Siyasal Sosyalleşme ve Siyasal Sembolizm, İstanbul: Birey Yayınları.
  • Verba, Sidney (1961), Small Groups and Political Behaviour, A Study of Leadership, New Jersey: Princeton University Pres
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA78VH84AD
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mehtap Yeşilorman Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2005
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005 Sayı: 32

Kaynak Göster

APA Yeşilorman, M. (2005). Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification. Bilig(32), 109-124.
AMA Yeşilorman M. Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification. Bilig. Haziran 2005;(32):109-124.
Chicago Yeşilorman, Mehtap. “Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification”. Bilig, sy. 32 (Haziran 2005): 109-24.
EndNote Yeşilorman M (01 Haziran 2005) Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification. Bilig 32 109–124.
IEEE M. Yeşilorman, “Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification”, Bilig, sy. 32, ss. 109–124, Haziran 2005.
ISNAD Yeşilorman, Mehtap. “Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification”. Bilig 32 (Haziran 2005), 109-124.
JAMA Yeşilorman M. Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification. Bilig. 2005;:109–124.
MLA Yeşilorman, Mehtap. “Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification”. Bilig, sy. 32, 2005, ss. 109-24.
Vancouver Yeşilorman M. Do Family Lose Their Political Efficacy or Not? Revisiting Intergenerational Transmission of Party Identification. Bilig. 2005(32):109-24.

Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Mütevelli Heyet Başkanlığı