Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Post-Sovyet Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksini Yeniden Ele Almak: Orta Asya Hâlâ Bir Alt Kompleks mi?

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 110, 135 - 156, 30.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.11006

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi Teorisi kapsamında Orta Asya ele alınmıştır. Barry Buzan ve Ole Wæver tarafından geliştirilen Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi teorisinde, Orta Asya,
Post-Sovyet Bölgesel Kompleksini oluşturan bir alt kompleks olarak tanımlanmakla birlikte belli şartlar gerçekleştiğinde ayrı bir komplekse dönüşebileceğini iddia etmiştir. 20 yılın ardından
bölgedeki devam ve değişimler yazarların bu iddiasında nereye gelindiğini analiz etme ihtiyacını doğurmuştur. Bu bakımdan bu çalışmada, orijinal çalışmanın revize edilmesi gereken yerleri
ve dönüşümler değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma, bölgenin ayrı bir komplekse dönüşmesinde siyasi güvenliğin önemini vurgulamakta ancak henüz ayrı bir kompleks olarak değerlendirilemeyeceği gösterilmeye çalışılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Acharya, Amitav. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 31, no. 3, 2017, pp. 271-85. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X.
  • Akkaya, Caner. “Orta Asya Bir “Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi” Olarak Tanımlanabilir Mi?” Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, pp. 173-88, doi:10.30803/adusobed.813410.
  • Allison, Roy. “Virtual Regionalism, Regional Structures and Regime Security in Central Asia.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 27, no. 2, 2008, pp. 185-202. doi:10.1080/02634930802355121.
  • Amable, Dennis Senam. “Theorizing the Emergence of Security Regions: An Adaptation for the Regional Security Complex Theory.” Global Studies Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, 2022, doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksac065.
  • Birdişli, Fikret. “Orta Asya Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi Bağlamında Kırgızistan-Özbekistan İhtilafı.” Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 30, 2017, pp. 123-43.
  • Buzan, Barry. People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Wheatsheaf Books, 1983, bvbr.bib-bvb.de/F? func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=004136208&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
  • Buzan, Barry, et al. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub, 1998.
  • Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Cambridge Studies in İnternational Relations 91.
  • Carrère d’Encausse, Hélène. The Great Challenge: Nationalities and the Bolshevik State, 1917-1930. Holmes & Meier, 1992.
  • Efegil, Ertan, and Neziha Musaoğlu. “Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemin Uluslararası Sisteminin Yapısına İlişkin Görüşler Üzerine Bir Eleştiri.” Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol. 2, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1-24.
  • Fazendeiro, Bernardo Teles. Uzbekistan’s Foreign Policy: The Struggle for Recognition and Self-Reliance Under Karimov. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
  • Frazier, Derrick, and Robert Stewart-Ingersoll. “Regional Powers and Security: A Framework for Understanding Order Within Regional Security Complexes.” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 16, no. 4, 2010, pp. 731-53, doi:10.1177/1354066109359847.
  • Güngör, Uğur. “Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi.” 21. Yüzyılda Uluslararası Güvenlik, ed. Mehmet Şahin, and Ömer Faruk Kocatepe, Nobel Akademik, 2022, pp. 157-70.
  • Kaya, Rüştü. “Central Asian ‘Regional Security Complex’ and Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” International Journal of Political Science and Urban Studies, vol. 7, Özel Sayı, 2019, pp. 53-71, doi:10.14782/ipsus.594452.
  • Kocatepe, Ömer Faruk. Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı. Politik ve Askerî İşbirliği. Nobel Akademik, 2022.
  • Koch, Natalie. “Disorder over the Border: Spinning the Spectre of İnstability Through Time and Space in Central Asia.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 37, no. 1, 2018, pp. 13-30, doi:10.1080/02634937.2017.1338667.
  • Luong, Pauline Jones, and Erika Weinthal. “New Friends, New Fears in Central Asia.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 2, 2002, pp. 61-70.
  • Menon, Rajan. “The New Great Game in Central Asia.” Survival, vol. 45, no. 2, 2003, pp. 187-204, doi:10.1080/00396338.2003.9688581.
  • Nogayeva, Ainur. “ABD, Rusya ve Çin’in Nüfuz Mücadelesinde Orta Asya – Araçlar ve Süreçler.” bilig, no. 62, 2012, pp. 183-204.
  • Nourzhanov, Kirill. “Changing Security Threat Perceptions in Central Asia.”
  • Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 63, no. 1, 2009, pp. 85-104, doi:10.1080/10357710802666133.
  • Patnaik, Ajay. “Regionalism and Regional Cooperation in Central Asia.” International Studies, vol. 56, 2-3, 2019, pp. 147-62, doi:10.1177/0020881719852567.
  • Purtaş, Fırat. “Cultural Diplomacy Initiatives of Turkic Republics.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol. XXII, no. 1, 2017, pp. 91-114.
  • Scott, David. “The Great Power ‘Great Game’ Between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’.” Geopolitics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1-26, doi:10.1080/14650040701783243.
  • Spechler, Dina Rome, and Martin C. Spechler. “The Foreign Policy of Uzbekistan: Sources, Objectives and Outcomes: 1991-2009.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 29, no. 2, 2010, pp. 159-70, doi:10.1080/02634937.2010.490679.
  • The World Bank. Military Expenditure (% of GDP) – Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, World. Data World Bank. January 1, 2023, data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=KZ-UZ-1W.
  • Troitskiy, Evgeny F. “Central Asian Regional Security Complex: The Impact of Russian and US Policies.” Global Society, vol. 29, no. 1, 2015, pp. 2-22, doi: 10.1080/13600826.2014.961125.
  • Uslu, Nasuh. “The Central Asian Countries Relations with Russia and China: The Impact of Sensitivities, Dependencies, Threat Perceptions and Regional Organizations.” Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol. 17, no. 34, 2024, pp. 21-42, doi: 10.19060/gav.1498687.
  • Wohlforth, William C. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pp. 5-41.
  • Yalçın, Hasan Basri, and Bekir İlhan. “Tek Kutuplu Sistemde Süper Güç Davranışı Dönemi: Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Amerikan Dış Politikası ve Trump.” Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, 2020, pp. 545-560, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.780193.
  • Zengin, Alperen Kürşad, and İlyas Topsakal. “Gordian Knot in Central Asia Regional Security Complex a Multi-Vector Analysis.” Eurasian Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, 2020, pp. 19-36.

Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 110, 135 - 156, 30.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.11006

Öz

In this study, Central Asia is addressed within the framework of the Regional Security Complex Theory. In the Regional Security Complex theory developed by Barry Buzan and Ole Wæver, Central Asia is defined as a sub-complex that constitutes the Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex but claims that it can become a separate complex under certain conditions. Twenty years after their pioneering study, the continuities and changes in the region have necessitated an analysis of where the authors’ claim stands. Therefore, in this study, the areas that need to be revised in the
original work and the transformations have been evaluated. The study emphasizes the importance of political security in the region’s transformation into a separate complex, but attempts to
demonstrate that it cannot yet be considered a separate complex.

Etik Beyan

There is no conflict of interest with any institution or person within the scope of this study. There is no conflict of interest between the authors.

Kaynakça

  • Acharya, Amitav. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 31, no. 3, 2017, pp. 271-85. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X.
  • Akkaya, Caner. “Orta Asya Bir “Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi” Olarak Tanımlanabilir Mi?” Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, pp. 173-88, doi:10.30803/adusobed.813410.
  • Allison, Roy. “Virtual Regionalism, Regional Structures and Regime Security in Central Asia.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 27, no. 2, 2008, pp. 185-202. doi:10.1080/02634930802355121.
  • Amable, Dennis Senam. “Theorizing the Emergence of Security Regions: An Adaptation for the Regional Security Complex Theory.” Global Studies Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, 2022, doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksac065.
  • Birdişli, Fikret. “Orta Asya Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi Bağlamında Kırgızistan-Özbekistan İhtilafı.” Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 30, 2017, pp. 123-43.
  • Buzan, Barry. People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Wheatsheaf Books, 1983, bvbr.bib-bvb.de/F? func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=004136208&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
  • Buzan, Barry, et al. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub, 1998.
  • Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Cambridge Studies in İnternational Relations 91.
  • Carrère d’Encausse, Hélène. The Great Challenge: Nationalities and the Bolshevik State, 1917-1930. Holmes & Meier, 1992.
  • Efegil, Ertan, and Neziha Musaoğlu. “Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemin Uluslararası Sisteminin Yapısına İlişkin Görüşler Üzerine Bir Eleştiri.” Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol. 2, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1-24.
  • Fazendeiro, Bernardo Teles. Uzbekistan’s Foreign Policy: The Struggle for Recognition and Self-Reliance Under Karimov. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
  • Frazier, Derrick, and Robert Stewart-Ingersoll. “Regional Powers and Security: A Framework for Understanding Order Within Regional Security Complexes.” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 16, no. 4, 2010, pp. 731-53, doi:10.1177/1354066109359847.
  • Güngör, Uğur. “Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi.” 21. Yüzyılda Uluslararası Güvenlik, ed. Mehmet Şahin, and Ömer Faruk Kocatepe, Nobel Akademik, 2022, pp. 157-70.
  • Kaya, Rüştü. “Central Asian ‘Regional Security Complex’ and Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” International Journal of Political Science and Urban Studies, vol. 7, Özel Sayı, 2019, pp. 53-71, doi:10.14782/ipsus.594452.
  • Kocatepe, Ömer Faruk. Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı. Politik ve Askerî İşbirliği. Nobel Akademik, 2022.
  • Koch, Natalie. “Disorder over the Border: Spinning the Spectre of İnstability Through Time and Space in Central Asia.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 37, no. 1, 2018, pp. 13-30, doi:10.1080/02634937.2017.1338667.
  • Luong, Pauline Jones, and Erika Weinthal. “New Friends, New Fears in Central Asia.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 2, 2002, pp. 61-70.
  • Menon, Rajan. “The New Great Game in Central Asia.” Survival, vol. 45, no. 2, 2003, pp. 187-204, doi:10.1080/00396338.2003.9688581.
  • Nogayeva, Ainur. “ABD, Rusya ve Çin’in Nüfuz Mücadelesinde Orta Asya – Araçlar ve Süreçler.” bilig, no. 62, 2012, pp. 183-204.
  • Nourzhanov, Kirill. “Changing Security Threat Perceptions in Central Asia.”
  • Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 63, no. 1, 2009, pp. 85-104, doi:10.1080/10357710802666133.
  • Patnaik, Ajay. “Regionalism and Regional Cooperation in Central Asia.” International Studies, vol. 56, 2-3, 2019, pp. 147-62, doi:10.1177/0020881719852567.
  • Purtaş, Fırat. “Cultural Diplomacy Initiatives of Turkic Republics.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol. XXII, no. 1, 2017, pp. 91-114.
  • Scott, David. “The Great Power ‘Great Game’ Between India and China: ‘The Logic of Geography’.” Geopolitics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1-26, doi:10.1080/14650040701783243.
  • Spechler, Dina Rome, and Martin C. Spechler. “The Foreign Policy of Uzbekistan: Sources, Objectives and Outcomes: 1991-2009.” Central Asian Survey, vol. 29, no. 2, 2010, pp. 159-70, doi:10.1080/02634937.2010.490679.
  • The World Bank. Military Expenditure (% of GDP) – Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, World. Data World Bank. January 1, 2023, data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=KZ-UZ-1W.
  • Troitskiy, Evgeny F. “Central Asian Regional Security Complex: The Impact of Russian and US Policies.” Global Society, vol. 29, no. 1, 2015, pp. 2-22, doi: 10.1080/13600826.2014.961125.
  • Uslu, Nasuh. “The Central Asian Countries Relations with Russia and China: The Impact of Sensitivities, Dependencies, Threat Perceptions and Regional Organizations.” Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol. 17, no. 34, 2024, pp. 21-42, doi: 10.19060/gav.1498687.
  • Wohlforth, William C. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pp. 5-41.
  • Yalçın, Hasan Basri, and Bekir İlhan. “Tek Kutuplu Sistemde Süper Güç Davranışı Dönemi: Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Amerikan Dış Politikası ve Trump.” Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, 2020, pp. 545-560, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.780193.
  • Zengin, Alperen Kürşad, and İlyas Topsakal. “Gordian Knot in Central Asia Regional Security Complex a Multi-Vector Analysis.” Eurasian Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, 2020, pp. 19-36.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Türk Dünyası Çalışmaları, Uluslararası Güvenlik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ömer Faruk Kocatepe 0000-0001-8647-4634

Mehmet Şahin 0000-0002-0142-6666

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Temmuz 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Sayı: 110

Kaynak Göster

APA Kocatepe, Ö. F., & Şahin, M. (2024). Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?. Bilig(110), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.11006
AMA Kocatepe ÖF, Şahin M. Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?. Bilig. Temmuz 2024;(110):135-156. doi:10.12995/bilig.11006
Chicago Kocatepe, Ömer Faruk, ve Mehmet Şahin. “Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?”. Bilig, sy. 110 (Temmuz 2024): 135-56. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.11006.
EndNote Kocatepe ÖF, Şahin M (01 Temmuz 2024) Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?. Bilig 110 135–156.
IEEE Ö. F. Kocatepe ve M. Şahin, “Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?”, Bilig, sy. 110, ss. 135–156, Temmuz 2024, doi: 10.12995/bilig.11006.
ISNAD Kocatepe, Ömer Faruk - Şahin, Mehmet. “Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?”. Bilig 110 (Temmuz 2024), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.11006.
JAMA Kocatepe ÖF, Şahin M. Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?. Bilig. 2024;:135–156.
MLA Kocatepe, Ömer Faruk ve Mehmet Şahin. “Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?”. Bilig, sy. 110, 2024, ss. 135-56, doi:10.12995/bilig.11006.
Vancouver Kocatepe ÖF, Şahin M. Post-Soviet Regional Security Complex Revisited: Is Central Asia Still A Subcomplex?. Bilig. 2024(110):135-56.

Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Mütevelli Heyet Başkanlığı