Disabled People from the Perspective of the Contributions to Construction Islamic Civilization

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2020 Sayı: 41, 67 - 95, 15.05.2020

İlyas Akyüzoğlu

https://doi.org/10.28949/bilimname.542932

Cited By: 2

Öz

One of the biggest dificulties in the social sciences is the attempt to describe the term “civilization” in a clear way, by clearly describing its contents and limitations. Although this difficulty of describing, we can describe the civilization briefly is, “all of the material and spiritual efforts of mankind to make that human life on the earth, beautiful, liveable and sustainable”.

The magnificience and power of civilizations is measured by the material and spiritual values that they produce. We can say that while material values represent power in general, spiritual values represent magnitude. When we look at, the past and present civilizations in the world, we can see that civilizations, which can not protect their material power in general, can not protect their existence. The Islamic civilization is still alive, although it has lost its material power. Because the Islamic civilization has risen above spiritual values, and the material power obtained subsequently. At the beginning of the things that make Islamic civilization valuable and powerful comes to look at the mankind most respectable being created by Allah. Human beings are valuable because they are human beings. The human is can not discriminated because of his language, nation, color or disability.

In studies dealing with disabled people, usually the following method is followed: First of all, the definition of disability, the types of disability, legal status of them, the problems of the disabled people, developments and improvoments about disabled people in historical process. Finally, the examples of the disabled people in history and the researches are ends. 

This method which researchers deal with in their studies about disabled people, reflects a categorical way of thinking and a discriminatory perspective that we think absolutely no desire any researcher. Whereas, the word of “disability” is a concept that must be used to describe and to refer to that individual's disability, not for discriminatory expressions. The discriminatory and exclusionary approach is the most evident indicator of undeveloped societies. 

In this regard, the measure of being a developed society is to accept the disabled as a normal individual. It is possible to see the many examples of this in the social structure that Prophet Muhammad established. Indeed, the Islamic civilization that the Prophet Muhammad laid the foundation of, has shed light on humanity for centuries, taught justice and virtue to the world, allowed that all societies with different colors, races and beliefs had to taste the honor of human life. The most important feature that distinguishes Islamic civilization from others is that it accepts human beings as the most valuable being created by Allah. Every person who does not cause corruption on the earth is respectable in Islam; his race, color, disability do not cast a shadow on this respectness. 

The Qur'an states that people are created to serve Allah and human being is not created in vain and will not be left unattended throughout his life on earth. The Earth is a test site for they, and as long as they lives, they will be tested in various ways (sometimes with their souls and sometimes with their goods). To act in accordance with the purposes of creation in the world of test is the only way for the believers to the salvation and reach the consent of Allah. Because they were created by Him and will also be to Him. 

If a believer wants to be considered successful in the world of test (world life), firstly he must believe in Allah and the judgment day. Then he must promote the people for virtue and the prevent them from vice. He should be in race with other people for goodness. These criteria apply to all believers who are male, female, disabled and non-disabled, and only then they will have access to Allah's sake and will enter heaven. 

According to the Islamic thought, the value and superiority of people in front of Allah is related to their sincerity. The thing that makes people valueless and worthless in front of Allah is their disbelief. The prophet Muhammad emphasized in his hadiths that is not the appearance or property of what determines the value of people in the presence of Allah, “Allah doesn’t look at your image and your goods, but he will look at your hearts and what you do.”

The Qur'an doesn’t categorically approach the disability and doesn’t consider them different from other people who don’t have any disabilities in terms of rights and responsibilities due to their deficiency. In addition, the terms about disability in the Qur'an are also mentioned but most of them are figuratively and have been used for those who resist faith. For example, summ/deaf words in eight places, umy/blind words in seventeen places, bukm/dumb word in one place was used in the figurative sense to criticize the disbelievers. 

Thanks to this point of view, despite of many disabled individuals who have different disabilities live integrated with society and have made important contributions to the development and progression of Islamic civilization.

 Our article is also a production of reflection this thoughts. The disabled people in the Islamic civilization are the inseparable part of the social structure. With this approach, disabled people in Islamic geography have participated in collective gatherings at the maximum level and have made great contributions to the construction and promotion of their productivity and civilization. Some, have brought about permanent effects in the military and political scene, some in religious and human sciences, and for the later generations they have been horizon-opening examples.One of the biggest dificulties in the social sciences is the attempt to describe the term “civilization” in a clear way, by clearly describing its contents and limitations. Although this difficulty of describing, we can describe the civilization briefly is, “all of the material and spiritual efforts of mankind to make that human life on the earth, beautiful, liveable and sustainable”.
The magnificience and power of civilizations is measured by the material and spiritual values that they produce. We can say that while material values represent power in general, spiritual values represent magnitude. When we look at, the past and present civilizations in the world, we can see that civilizations, which can not protect their material power in general, can not protect their existence. The Islamic civilization is still alive, although it has lost its material power. Because the Islamic civilization has risen above spiritual values, and the material power obtained subsequently. At the beginning of the things that make Islamic civilization valuable and powerful comes to look at the mankind most respectable being created by Allah. Human beings are valuable because they are human beings. The human is can not discriminated because of his language, nation, color or disability.
In studies dealing with disabled people, usually the following method is followed: First of all, the definition of disability, the types of disability, legal status of them, the problems of the disabled people, developments and improvoments about disabled people in historical process. Finally, the examples of the disabled people in history and the researches are ends.
This method which researchers deal with in their studies about disabled people, reflects a categorical way of thinking and a discriminatory perspective that we think absolutely no desire any researcher. Whereas, the word of “disability” is a concept that must be used to describe and to refer to that individual's disability, not for discriminatory expressions. The discriminatory and exclusionary approach is the most evident indicator of undeveloped societies.
In this regard, the measure of being a developed society is to accept the disabled as a normal individual. It is possible to see the many examples of this in the social structure that Prophet Muhammad established. Indeed, the Islamic civilization that the Prophet Muhammad laid the foundation of, has shed light on humanity for centuries, taught justice and virtue to the world, allowed that all societies with different colors, races and beliefs had to taste the honor of human life. The most important feature that distinguishes Islamic civilization from others is that it accepts human beings as the most valuable being created by Allah. Every person who does not cause corruption on the earth is respectable in Islam; his race, color, disability do not cast a shadow on this respectness.
The Qur'an states that people are created to serve Allah and human being is not created in vain and will not be left unattended throughout his life on earth. The Earth is a test site for they, and as long as they lives, they will be tested in various ways (sometimes with their souls and sometimes with their goods). To act in accordance with the purposes of creation in the world of test is the only way for the believers to the salvation and reach the consent of Allah. Because they were created by Him and will also be to Him.
If a believer wants to be considered successful in the world of test (world life), firstly he must believe in Allah and the judgment day. Then he must promote the people for virtue and the prevent them from vice. He should be in race with other people for goodness. These criteria apply to all believers who are male, female, disabled and non-disabled, and only then they will have access to Allah's sake and will enter heaven.
According to the Islamic thought, the value and superiority of people in front of Allah is related to their sincerity. The thing that makes people valueless and worthless in front of Allah is their disbelief. The prophet Muhammad emphasized in his hadiths that is not the appearance or property of what determines the value of people in the presence of Allah, “Allah doesn’t look at your image and your goods, but he will look at your hearts and what you do.”
The Qur'an doesn’t categorically approach the disability and doesn’t consider them different from other people who don’t have any disabilities in terms of rights and responsibilities due to their deficiency. In addition, the terms about disability in the Qur'an are also mentioned but most of them are figuratively and have been used for those who resist faith. For example, summ/deaf words in eight places, umy/blind words in seventeen places, bukm/dumb word in one place was used in the figurative sense to criticize the disbelievers.
Thanks to this point of view, despite of many disabled individuals who have different disabilities live integrated with society and have made important contributions to the development and progression of Islamic civilization.
 Our article is also a production of reflection this thoughts. The disabled people in the Islamic civilization are the inseparable part of the social structure. With this approach, disabled people in Islamic geography have participated in collective gatherings at the maximum level and have made great contributions to the construction and promotion of their productivity and civilization. Some, have brought about permanent effects in the military and political scene, some in religious and human sciences, and for the later generations they have been horizon-opening examples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Islamic History and Arts/Islamic History, Disabled People

İslam Medeniyetine Katkıları Açısından Engelliler

Öz

Medeniyet sözcüğünü dört başı mamur, kapsam ve sınırlılıklarını net bir şekilde ortaya koyarak tarif etmeye çalışmak sosyal bilimler alanında karşılaşılan en büyük zorluklardan bir tanesidir. Medeniyetin kısaca tarifinin zorluğu ifade ettiği anlamın çok kapsamlı olmasından kaynaklanmakla birlikte biz yine de “insanoğlunun, yeryüzündeki hayatı güzel, yaşanabilir, sürdürülebilir bir hale getirmek için ortaya koymuş olduğu maddi ve manevi çabaların tümü” şeklinde tarif edersek tanımlamanın daha isabetli olacağını düşünmekteyiz.
İnsanoğlunun yeryüzünü yaşanabilir hale getirme adına ortaya koyduğu çabalarının ürünü olan medeniyetlerin gücü ve büyüklüğü, ürettikleri maddi/manevi değerlerin etkinliği ile doğru orantılıdır. Burada maddi değerler genelde medeniyetlerin gücünü, manevi değerler ise büyüklüğünü temsil eder. Dünyadaki gelmiş-geçmiş medeniyetlere göz attığımızda ise maddi gücünü koruyamayan medeniyetlerin tarih sahnesindeki etkinliklerinin ya zayıfladığını ya da ortadan kalktığını görürüz. Bunlardan maddi gücünü kaybetmiş olmasına rağmen hala etkinliğini sürdüreni ise İslam medeniyetidir. Çünkü İslam medeniyeti manevi değerler üzerinde yükselmiş, maddi gücü ise sonradan elde etmiştir. İslam medeniyetini değerli ve güçlü kılan şeylerin başında ise insana, Allah’ın yarattığı en saygıdeğer varlık gözüyle bakması gelir. İnsan, insan olması hasebiyle değerlidir. Dili, ırkı, rengi veya engeli yüzünden ayrımcılığa tabi tutulmaz.
Çalışmada İslam medeniyetinin inşa edildiği ilk yüzyıllarda yaşamış ve bu sürece katkıda bulunmuş/katkılarıyla ön plana çıkmış olan engelli bireyler ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca engellilerin rengi, dili, etnik kökeni hatta konu İslam medeniyeti olmasına rağmen dini aidiyetleri dahi araştırma konusu yapılmamıştır; önemli olan İslam medeniyetinin inşa sürecine olan katkılarıdır. Nitekim İslam düşünce felsefesinde ve bu düşüncenin yansıması olan medeniyetinde engelliler, toplumsal yapının aksayan değil ayrılmaz parçasıdırlar. Bu yaklaşımın bir tezahürü olarak İslam coğrafyasında engelli bireyler azami derecede topluma entegre olmuşlar, üretkenlikleri ile de medeniyetin inşasına ve yükselmesine büyük katkılarda bulunmuşlardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İslam Tarihi ve Sanatları/İslam Tarihi, Engelliler, Siyasi ve Askeri Alan, Dini ve Beşeri ilimler

Kaynakça

• Acar, Yusuf (2013). “Saadet Asrı Model Toplum Tecrübesinin Engellilere İlişkin Kodları”. Dinbilimleri AAD. (XIII/1). 131 -171.Açıkel, Yusuf (2010/2). “Hadisler Işığında görme Engelliler ve Bazı Öneriler”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. (25). 15-44.Ahmed b. Hanbel (1982). el-Müsned. İstanbul: Çağrı Yay.Ahmed İsa (1981). Tarihu’l-Bimaristanat fi’l-İslam. Beyrut: Daru’r-Raid ArabiAydınlı, Âbdullah (1999). “İbn Ümmü Mektûm”. İslam Ansiklopedisi. C. 20. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 434-435.Belâzurî (1996). Ensâbu’l-Eşrâf. (I-XIII). Süheyl Zekkâr. Riyâd ez-Ziriklî. Beyrut: Daru’l-Fikr.Buhârî, Ebû Abdillah Muhammed b. İsmail (1981). el-Câmiu’s-Sahîh. İstanbul.Çetinkaya Görmüş, Neslihan (2007). İslam Fıkhında Engellilerin İbadet Hukuku. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi.Ebu Muhammed et-Tayyib b. Abdullah (2008). Kilâdetu’n-Nahr fî Vefeyâtu E’yâni’d-Dehr. (I-VI). Cidde: Dâru’l-Minhâc.Ebû Nuaym, Ahmed b. Abdillah el-Isbahânî (1998). Marifetü’s-sahâbe. Thk. Adil b. Yusuf. I. Baskı. Riyad: Daru’l-Vatan li’n-Neşr.Ebu Yusuf, Ya’kub b. Sufyân (1981). el-Ma’rife ve’t-Târîh. (I-III). Ekrem Ziya Umerî. Beyrut: Muessesetu’r-Risâle.Ekrem b. Ziya el-Umerî (2009). Asru’l-Hilâfe er-Râşide. Riyad: Mektebetu’l-Ubeykân.el-Câhiz, Ebi Osman Amr b. Bahr (1990). el-Bursân ve’l-Urcân ve’l-Umyân ve’l-Hûlân. thk: Abdusselam Muhammed Harun. Beyrut: Daru Cîl.Er, Rahmi (2002). “Ebü’l-Müstehil el-Kümeyt b. Zeyd b. Huneys el-Esedî”. İsalam Ansiklopedisi. C. 26. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 551-552.es-Sâidî, Abdurrezzak b. Farac (1987/1988). “Usulu İlmi’l-Arabiyye fi’l-Medine”. Medine İslam Üniversitesi Dergisi. sayı: 105-106. Medine..Hâkim en-Neysâbûrî (1990). el-Mustedrek ale’s-Sahihayn. (I.IV). thk: Mustafa Abdulkadir Atâ. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kütüb İlmiyye.Has, Polat (1991). İslâmiyette ve Hıristiyanlıkta ilim Anlayışı. İzmir: TÖV Yay.İbn Asâkir (1998). Tarihu Dimeşk. (I-LXXX). thk: Amr b. Ğarame el-Amrî. Beyrut: Daru’l-Fikr li’t-Tıbaa ve’n-Neşr ve’t-Tevzî’.İbn Cevzî, Cemaluddin Ebi’l-Ferec Abdurrahman (1997). Telkîhu Fuhûmi Ehli’l-Eser. fi Uyûni’t-Tarihi ve’s-Siyer. Beyrut: Şeriketu Dari’l-Erkam b. Ebi’l-Erkam.İbn Devâdârî (1981). Kenzu’d-Durer ve Câmiu’l-Ğurer. (I-IX). thk: Komisyon. nşr: İsa Elbây el-Halebî. . b.y..İbn Fûtî eş-Şeybânî (h.1416). Mecmeu’l-Âdâb fî Mu’cemi’l-Elkâb. (I-VI). thk: Muhammed el-Kâzım. İran: Muessesetu Tıbaa ve’n-Neşr.İbn Hacer el-Askalânî (h.1415). el-İsâbe fî Temyîzi’s-Sahâbe. (I-VIII). thk: Adil Ahmed. Ali Muhammed. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütüb İlmiyye.İbn Hallikân (1994). Vefayâtu’l-A’yân ve Enbâu Ebnai’z-Zamân. (I-VII). thk: İhsan Abbas. Beyrut: Dâru Sâdır.İbn Kesîr, İsmail b. Ömer (1988). el-Bidâye ve’n-Nihâye. (I-XIV). thk: Ali Şîrî. b.y.: Daru İhyâ-i Turâs Arabî.____ (1999). Tefsîr. (I-VIII) thk: Sâmî b. Muhammed Selâme. 2. baskı. Riyad: Dâru Tayyibe li’n-Neşri ve’t-Tevzî’.____ (1986) el-Bidaye ve’n-Nihaye. (I-XV). b.y.: Daru’l-Fikr.İbn Kuteybe, Ebu Muhammed Abdullah b. Müslim Ed-Dîneverî (1992). el-Meârif. thk: Servet Ukkâşe. 2. basım. Kahire: el-Hey’etu’l-Mısriyye el-Âmme li’l-Kitâb.İbn Manzûr, Muhammed b. Mukrim (1984). Muhtasaru Tarihi Dımeşk li-İbni Asâkir. (XXIX). thk: Ruhya Nahhas vdDımeşk: Daru’l-Fikr.İbn Miskeveyh (2000). Tecaribu’l-Umem ve Teakibu’l-Himem. (I-VII). thk: Ebu’l-Kasım İmâmî. Tahrân.İbn Muhammed el-Cevzî (1992). el-Muntazam fî Târîhi’l-Mulûk ve’l-Umem. (I-XIX). thk: Muhammed-Mustafa Abdulkâdir Atâ. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kutub İlmiyye.İbn-i Hazm, Ali b. Ahmed (1900). Cevami’u-Sire. thk: İhsan Abbas. Mısır: Daru’l-Mearif._________ (1980). Cevami’u-Sire. (I-VIII). Beyrut: Daru’l-İlm li’l-Melayin.İbn-i Sa’d (1968). Tabakât. (I-VIII). thk: İhsan Abbas. Beyrut: Daru Sâdırİbnu’l-Esîr, İzzüddînEbu’l-Hasan Ali b. Muhammed el-Cezerî, (1989). Usdu’l-Ğâbe. (I-VI). Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr.______(1970). Üsdü’l-Gâbe fî Ma’rifeti’s-Sahâbe. thk: Muhammed İbrahim-Muhammed Ahmed Âşur- Mahmud Abdülvehhab. b.y.İcli (1985). Ma’rifetu’s-Sikat. (I-II). Medine: Mektebetu’d-Dar.İsfehânî, Ebu’l-Ferec (t.y.). el-Eğânî. (I-XXIV). thk: Semîr Câbir. Beyrut: Daâru’l-Fikr.Kalkaşendi (1985). Measiru’l-İnafe fi Mealimi’l-Hilafe. (I-III). thk: Abdussettar Ahmed Firac. Kuveyt.Kasar, Veysel (2013). “Allah’ın Adalet ve Hikmeti Bağlamında Engellilik Problemi”. Harran Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. (29). 63-104.Katip Çelebi, Mustafa b. Abdulah (2010). Süllemu’l-Vusul ila tabakati’l-Fuhul. (I-VI). thk: Mahmud Abdulkadir el-Arnaut. İstanbul. IRCICA.Kazancı, A. Lütfi (1989). ‘Akra b. Habis’. İslam Ansiklopedisi. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 285-285.Kemaluddin el-Enbârî (1985). Nuzhetu’l-Elbâ fî Tabakâti’l-Udebâ. thk: İbrahim Samerrâî. Ürdün: Mektebetu Menâr.Kıftî, Cemaluddin Ebu’l-Hasen (1970). el-Muhammedûn mine’ş-Şuara ve Eş’aruhum. thk: Hasen Muammeri. Riyad: Daru’l-Yemame.____, Cemaluddin Ebu’l-Hasen (1982). İnbâhu’r-Ruvât alâ Enbâhi’r-Nuhât. (I-IV). thk: Muhammed Ebu’l-Fadl İbrahim. Kahire: Daru’l-Fikr el-Arabî.____ (2005). Ahbaru’l-Ulema bi-Ahbari’l-Hukema. thk: İbrahim Şemsuddin. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.Kırkız, Mustafa (2007). “Hakikat ve Mecaz Bağlamında Kur'an'da Engellilik İfade Eden Sözcüklerin Linguistik Analizi”. Fırat Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. (12:1). 103-117.Me’mûn el-Cennân (1993). el-Kumeyt b. Zeyd el-Esed. (Şâir Siyasî). Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütub el-İlmiyye.Mizzî, Yusuf b. Zeki (1980). Tehzîbu’l-Kemal. (I-XXXV). thk: Beşşâr Avvâd Ma’rûf. Beyrut: Muessesetu Risale.Müslim, Ebu’l-Huseyn b. Haccâc el-Kuşeyrî (t.y.). el-Câmiu’s-sahîhBeyrut t.y. Dârul-Cîl.Nesâî, Ebû Abdirrahman Ahmed b. Şuayb (1981). Sünen. İstanbul: Çağrı YayÖztürk Mustafa vd. (2013). “Zemahşerî”. İslam Ansiklopedisi. C. 44. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 235-238.Safedî, Salahuddin Halil b. Aybek (2000). el-Vâfî bi’l-Vefeyât. (I-XXIX). thk: Ahmed Arnaût. Beyrut: Daru İhyâi’t-Turâs._____ (1998). A’yânu’l-Asr ve A’vânu’n-Nasr. (I-V). thk: Ali Ebu Zeyd vd. Beyrut: Daru Fikri’l-Muâsır._____ (2007). Nukesu’l-Heymân fi Nuketi’l-‘Umyân. tlk: Mustafa Abdulkadir Ata. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kutub İlmiyye.Sancaklı, Saffet (2006). “Hz. Peygamber’in Engellilere Karşı Bakış Açısının Tesbiti”. Dinbilimleri AAD. (VI/2). 36-72Şemsuddin Ebu Muzaffer (2013). Mirâtu’z-Zamân. fî Tevârîhi’l-A’yân. (I-XXIII). thk: Komisyon. Şam: Daru’r-Risâle İlmiyye.Taberî, Muhammed b. Cerir (h.1387). Târîhu’r-Rusul ve’l-Mulûk. (I-XI). Beyrut: Daru Turâs._____ (h.1407). Tarihu Taberi. (I-V) Beyrut: Daru Kutubi’l-İlmiyye.Tezcan, Münir (2006). Kur’an’ın Engellilere Yaklaşımı ve İslam’ın Engellilere Tanıdığı Kolaylıklar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi . Kahramanmaraş. Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi.Tezcan, Münir (2007). “Kur’an’ın Bedensel Engelilere Yaklaşımı”. KSÜ İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. (10). 137-186.Topuzoğlu, Tevfik Rüştü (1994). “Ebü'l-Esved Zâlim b. Amr b. Süfyân b. Cendel ed-Düelî”. İslam Ansiklopedisi. C. 10. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 311-313. Yâkut el-Hamevî (1995). Mu’cemu’l-Buldân. (I-VII). Beyrut: Dâru Sâdır.Yazır, Elmalılı Hamdi. (t.y.) Hak Din Kur’an Dili. İstanbul: Eser Kitabevi.Yücel, Ahmet (1999). “Ebû Bekr Muhammed b. Sîrîn el-Basrî”. İslam Ansiklopedisi. C. 20. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 358-359.Zehebî (1993). Tarihu’l-İslam ve Vefâyâtu’l-Meşâhîri ve’l-A’lâm. (I-LII). thk: Ömer Abdusselam et-Tedmuri. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kutub el-Arabi._____ (2003). Tarihu’l-İslam ve Vefâyâtu’l-Meşâhîri ve’l-A’lâm. (I-XV). thk: Beşşar Avvad Ma’rûf. b.y: Daru’l-Ğarb el-İslamî._____ (1985). Siyer-i A’lâmi’n-Nubelâ. (I-XXV). thk: Komisyon. b.y: Muessesetu Risale.Zirikli, Hayruddin (1980). el-A’lâm. (I-VIII). Beyrut: Dâru’l-İlm li’l-Melâyîn.______ (2002). el-A’lam. (I-VIII). 15. Baskı. Beyrut: Dâru’l-İlm li’l-Melâyîn.