Araştırma Makalesi

The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds

Cilt: 8 7 Ekim 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds

Öz

NATO’s spending guideline is defined on a reported statistic: defence expenditure “according to an agreed definition” must reach 2% of GDP. Compliance can therefore be produced on two margins, by spending more or by widening what is counted as defence. This paper documents the second margin. Using five successive vintages of the NATO expenditure compendium (2023–2026) and the national accounts counterpart of defence spending (COFOG division 02) for 24 European allies, it establishes three facts. First, reported burdens accumulate at the guideline as it becomes politically binding: in the August 2025 compendium, 14 of 30 reporting allies place their 2025 estimate within [2,00; 2,05] per cent of GDP, six report exactly 2,00, and none reports below the line. Second, the gap between NATO-definition and national-accounts defence spending widens from a median of 0,08 percentage points of GDP in 2014 to 0,45 points in 2024, with 62% of allies exceeding a 0,25-point wedge. Third, the mass at the line partly melts on revision: first estimates in [2,00; 2,05] are revised down by 0,112 points on average and 35% of them end below 2,00, against 0,041 points and 17% just above the band. A fixed-effects gradient links wedge growth to the lagged distance from the guideline. The 2026 shift to a 3,5% core target plus an undefined 1,5% “defence- and security-related” category institutionalises the elastic perimeter rather than closing it.

Anahtar Kelimeler

defence expenditure, NATO 2% guideline, creative accounting, COFOG

Kaynakça

  1. Alt, J., Lassen, D. D., & Wehner, J. (2014). It isn’t just about Greece: Domestic politics, transparency and fiscal gimmickry in Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 707–716.
  2. Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47–82.
  3. Becker, J. (2017). The correlates of transatlantic burden sharing: Revising the agenda for theoretical and policy analysis. Defense & Security Analysis, 33(2), 131–157.
  4. Beetsma, R., Giuliodori, M., & Wierts, P. (2009). Planning to cheat: EU fiscal policy in real time. Economic Policy, 24(60), 753–804.
  5. Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538.
  6. Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90.
  7. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Olsen, T., & Pistaferri, L. (2011). Adjustment costs, firm responses, and micro vs. macro labor supply elasticities: Evidence from Danish tax records. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 749–804.
  8. Dhaene, G., & Jochmans, K. (2015). Split-panel jackknife estimation of fixed-effect models. Review of Economic Studies, 82(3), 991–1030.
  9. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
  10. Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yolusever, A. (2026). The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, 8, 384-409. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.2028852
AMA
1.Yolusever A. The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds. BILTURK. 2026;8:384-409. doi:10.47103/bilturk.2028852
Chicago
Yolusever, Aras. 2026. “The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds”. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies 8 (Ekim): 384-409. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.2028852.
EndNote
Yolusever A (01 Ekim 2026) The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies 8 384–409.
IEEE
[1]A. Yolusever, “The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds”, BILTURK, c. 8, ss. 384–409, Eki. 2026, doi: 10.47103/bilturk.2028852.
ISNAD
Yolusever, Aras. “The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds”. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies 8 (01 Ekim 2026): 384-409. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.2028852.
JAMA
1.Yolusever A. The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds. BILTURK. 2026;8:384–409.
MLA
Yolusever, Aras. “The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds”. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, c. 8, Ekim 2026, ss. 384-09, doi:10.47103/bilturk.2028852.
Vancouver
1.Aras Yolusever. The Elastic Perimeter: What Counts as Defence When the Target Binds. BILTURK. 01 Ekim 2026;8:384-409. doi:10.47103/bilturk.2028852