Review

Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants

Volume: 32 Number: 2 December 31, 2023
EN

Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants

Abstract

In the food industry, synthetic color-active compounds can be added as additives to replace natural colors that are damaged during processing. This addition reduces the batch-to-batch fluctuation and increases the development of new or desired products that are appealing to consumers where natural colors are absent. Synthetic colorants cannot be produced by any bioprocess. In contrast, the Food and Drug Administration declared that algae such as Chlorella, Cryptothecodinium, Dunaliella Nannochloropsis, Nitzschia, Phaeodactylum, Schizochytrium, and Spirulina are trustable sources of food pigments as natural sources. These microalgae are photoautotrophic species and can be found on the "Generally Recognized as Safe-GRAS" list of food additives. Microalgae-derived pigments, which are also known as nutraceutical supplements, have been recently used in functional food products. Some of them are used as health and color supporters because of their excellent antioxidant properties that block oxidative reactions in lipid-rich food products. Their unique properties of being harmless to the environment were scientifically proven as well. As a result, the demand for their commercial use is increasing gradually. However, the bioprocess of algae on a huge scale is very limited due to some environmental factors and is hard to produce continuously. The scope of this review was to provide concise knowledge about biopigments extracted from microalgae and their production methods and to clarify the current implementations in the industry. Additionally, food-grade biopigments were compared with synthetic ones. The primary issues with bioprocesses used to produce colorants were highlighted, and as a result, the expected studies were discussed that would be conducted soon.

Keywords

References

  1. Adarme-Vega, T. C., Lim, D. K. Y., Timmins, M., Vernen, F., Li, Y., & Schenk, P. M. (2012). Microalgal biofactories: a promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production. Microbial Cell Factories, 11(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-96
  2. Berthon, J.-Y., Nachat-Kappes, R., Bey, M., Cadoret, J. P., Renimel, I. & Filaire, E. (2017). Marine algae an attractive source to skin care. Free Radical Research. 510 (6), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715762.2017.1355550
  3. Bhalamur, G.L., Valerie, O. & Mark, L. (2018). Valuable bioproducts obtained from microalgal biomass and their commercial applications: A review. Environmental Engineering Research. 230 (3), 229–241. ISSN 1226-1025. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE07417103
  4. Chatterjee, A., Singh, S., Agrawal, C., Yadav, S., Rai, R. & Rai, L.C. (2017). Role of Algae as a Biofertilizer. In Algal Green Chemistry, Recent Progress in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63784-0.00010-2
  5. Carocho, M., Barreiro, M. F., Morales, P. & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2014). Adding Molecules to Food, Pros and Cons: A Review on Synthetic and Natural Food Additives. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 13(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12065
  6. da Rosa, M. D. H., Alves, C. J., dos Santos, F. N., de Souza, A. O., Zavareze, E. da R., Pinto, E. & Noseda, M. D. (2023). Macroalgae and Microalgae Biomass as Feedstock for Products Applied to Bioenergy and Food Industry: A Brief Review. Energies, 16(4), 1820. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en16041820
  7. Debnath, S. & Ghosh, D. (2023). Qualitative and Quantitative Studies on Biopigment Producing Algal Regime from Marine Water Resources of Sundarban Region. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 17(1):576-589. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.17.1.55
  8. de Oliveira, A. P. F. & Arisseto-Bragotto, A. P. (2022). Microalgae-based products: Food and public health. Future Foods, 6:100157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100157

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Algology, Bioprocessing, Bioproduction and Bioproducts

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Early Pub Date

June 6, 2023

Publication Date

December 31, 2023

Submission Date

January 11, 2023

Acceptance Date

May 29, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 32 Number: 2

APA
Üçüncüoğlu, D. (2023). Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants. Biotech Studies, 32(2), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572
AMA
1.Üçüncüoğlu D. Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants. Biotech Studies. 2023;32(2):59-64. doi:10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572
Chicago
Üçüncüoğlu, Didar. 2023. “Food Grade Microalgae-Based Biopigments and Their Production Technique versus Synthetic Colorants”. Biotech Studies 32 (2): 59-64. https://doi.org/10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572.
EndNote
Üçüncüoğlu D (December 1, 2023) Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants. Biotech Studies 32 2 59–64.
IEEE
[1]D. Üçüncüoğlu, “Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants”, Biotech Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 59–64, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572.
ISNAD
Üçüncüoğlu, Didar. “Food Grade Microalgae-Based Biopigments and Their Production Technique versus Synthetic Colorants”. Biotech Studies 32/2 (December 1, 2023): 59-64. https://doi.org/10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572.
JAMA
1.Üçüncüoğlu D. Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants. Biotech Studies. 2023;32:59–64.
MLA
Üçüncüoğlu, Didar. “Food Grade Microalgae-Based Biopigments and Their Production Technique versus Synthetic Colorants”. Biotech Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, Dec. 2023, pp. 59-64, doi:10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572.
Vancouver
1.Didar Üçüncüoğlu. Food grade microalgae-based biopigments and their production technique versus synthetic colorants. Biotech Studies. 2023 Dec. 1;32(2):59-64. doi:10.38042/biotechstudies.1310572


ULAKBIM TR Index, Scopus, Google Scholar, Crossref, Scientific Indexing Services