A COLD WAR CONCEPT: DÉTENTE

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 121 - 142, 31.12.2025

Samet Zenginoğlu

https://doi.org/10.20493/birtop.1813290

https://izlik.org/JA83KG36LE

Öz

In many disciplines of the social sciences, it is thought that at least three factors should be considered in order to make an evaluation about a subject. One of these is the period of the issue or problem being addressed, which can be called the temporal context. Another is the identification and classification of terms that explain this period, which should be approached as conceptual context. Finally, a comparison is expected to be made in order to see the differences and changes in the cause-process-effect axes, which can be called the context of comparison. Considering these three factors, this study aims to focus on the concept of détente, one of the most “popular” concepts of the Cold War, so to speak. For this purpose, the temporal framework is limited to the Cold War period and various approaches to the concept and its reflections in international politics are presented. At the same time, perspectives on the causes, processes and outcomes of the construction of the détente process are presented. Through such a focus, it has been possible to draw attention to the similarities and especially the differences in the way the concept was perceived and applied by the actors during the Cold War.

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Cold War , Detente , USA , USSR

BİR SOĞUK SAVAŞ KAVRAMI: DÉTENTE

https://izlik.org/JA83KG36LE

Öz

Sosyal bilimlerin birçok disiplininde bir konu hakkında değerlendirme yapılabilmesi için asgari üç faktöre dikkat edilmesi gerektiği düşünülmektedir. Bunlardan birisi, ele alınan konunun ya da sorunun dönemi ile ilgilidir ki buna zamansal bağlam demek mümkündür. Bir diğeri, bu dönemi açıklayan terimlerin belirlenmesi ve tasnifidir ki buna kavramsal bağlam şeklinde yaklaşmak gerekmektedir. Son olarak ise sebep-süreç-sonuç eksenlerindeki farklılıkları ve değişimleri görebilmek için bir mukayese yapılması beklenmektedir ki buna da karşılaştırma bağlamı denebilmektedir. Bu üç faktörü göz önünde bulundurarak, bu çalışmada, Soğuk Savaş’ın deyim yerindeyse en “popüler” kavramlarından birisi olan détente kavramına odaklanılması amaçlanmıştır. İlgili amaç doğrultusunda, zamansal çerçeve Soğuk Savaş dönemi ekseninde sınırlandırılmıştır ve kavrama yönelik çeşitli yaklaşımlara ve kavramın uluslararası politikadaki yansımalarına yer verilmiştir. Aynı zamanda da détente sürecinin inşa edilmesine yönelik sebeplere, süreçlere ve sonuçlara dair perspektifler sunulmuştur. Böylesi bir odaklanma suretiyle kavramın Soğuk Savaş döneminde aktörler açısından algılanma ve uygulanma biçimleri arasındaki benzerliklere ve özellikle de farklılıklara dikkat çekilmesi mümkün olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Soğuk Savaş , Detente , ABD , SSCB

Kaynakça

• Armaoğlu, F. (2014). 20. yüzyıl siyasi tarihi. Timaş Yayınları.
• Ashton, S. R. (1989). In search of detente the politics of east-west relations since 1945. The Macmillan Press.
• Bansal, N. (2023). Critical analysis of the detente period in the cold war. International and Public Affairs. 7 (1), 9-13.
• Beauchamp, E. (2003). Alliance in anxiety detente and the Sino-American-Japanese triangle. Routledge.
• Britannica (2025, September 13). Detente. https://www.britannica.com/topic/detente
• Cooper, R. N. (2010). Economic aspects of the cold war, 1962–1975. In M. P.Leffler & O. A. Westad (Eds.). The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume II, Crises and Détente (pp. 44-64). Cambridge University Press.
• Daigle, C. (2012). The limits of detente the United States, the Soviet Union, and the Arap-Israeli conflict 1969-1973. New Haven & Yale University Press.
• Froman, M. B. (1991). The development of the idea of detente coming to terms. St. Antony’s Macmillan Series.
• Gaddis, J. L. (2010). Grand srategies in the cold war. In M. P.Leffler & O. A. Westad (Eds.). The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume II, Crises and Détente (pp. 1-21). Cambridge University Press.
• Gala, M. (2009). From INF to SDI: how Helsinki reshaped the transatlantic dimension of European security. In L. Nuti (Ed.). The Crisis of Détente in Europe From Helsinki to Gorbachev, 1975–1985 (pp. 111-123). Routledge.
• Garthoff, R. L. (1985). Détente and confrontation, American-Soviet relations from Nixon to Reagan. The Brooking Institution.
• Gelman, H. (1985). The rise and fall of the detente: causes and consequences. Rand.
• Goldmann, K. (1988). Change and stability in foreign policy, the problems and possibilities of detente. Princeton University Press.
• Hanes, S. M. & Hanes, R. C. (2004). Cold war almanac volume I. Thomson Gale.
• Hankimaki, J. M. (2007). Searching for a balance: the American perspective. In N. P. Ludlow (Ed.). European Integration and the Cold War Ostpolitik–Westpolitik, 1965–1973 (pp. 152-173). Routledge.
• Hofmann, A. (2007). The emergence of detente in Europe, Brandt, Kennedy and the formation of ostpolitik. Routledge.
• Hughes, R. G. (2007). Britain, Germany and the cold war the search for a european detente 1949-1967. Routledge.
• Jackson, I. (2001). The Economic cold war, America, Britain and east-west trade, 1948-63. Palgrave Macmillan. Kissinger, H. (2008). Diplomasi. İbrahim H. Kurt (Çev.). Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
• Korbel, J. (1972). Detente in Europe, real or imaginary?. Princeton University Press.
• Lazic, M. (2022). Unmaking détente Yugoslavia, the United States, and the global cold war, 1968–1980. Lexington Books.
• Leifer, M. (1992). Cambodia in conflict. In L. Palmier (Ed.). Detente in Asia? (pp. 66-79). Palgrave Macmillan. Lightbody, B. (1999). The cold war. Routledge.
• Macintyre, T. (2007). Anglo-German relations during the labour governments 1964–70. Manchester University Press.
• McAdams, A. J. (1985). East Germany and detente building authority after the wall. Cambridge University Press.
• McMahon, R. (2003). Cold war a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
• McWhinney, E. (1964). Objectives and method in international law and the east-west detente. In E. McWhinney (Ed.). Law, Foreign Policy, and the East-West Détente (pp. 33-45). University of Toronto Press.
• Nelson, K. L. (2019). The making of detente, Soviet-American relations in the shadow of Vietnam. John Hopkins University Press.
• Niedhart, G. (2017). East-west conflict: short cold war and long détente an essay on terminology and periodization. In O. Bange & P. Villaume (Eds.). The Long Détente Changing Concepts of Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1950s–1980 (pp. 19-30). CEU Press.
• Nuti, L. (2009). The United States and the opening to the left, 1953-1963. In M. Trachtenberg (Ed.). Between Empire and Alliance America and Europe during the Cold War (pp. 83-98). Rowman & Littlefield, Publishers.
• Oudenaren, J. V. (1991). Detente in Europe the Soviet Union and the west since 1953. Duke University Press.
• Öcal, M. (2017). Soğuk savaş’tan bir kesit: yapısal değişiklikler ve bloklar arası ilişkiler (1960-1991). Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (2), 165-184.
• Poonkham, J. (2022). A genealogy of bamboo diplomacy the politics of Thai detente with Russia and China. Anu Press.
• Robb, T. A. (2014). Strained partnership? US–UK relations in the era of détente, 1969–77. Manchester University Press.
• Rother, B. (2009). Between east and west – social democracy as an alternative to communism and capitalism: Willy Brandt’s strategy as president of the socialist international. In L. Nuti (Ed.). The Crisis of Détente in Europe From Helsinki to Gorbachev, 1975–1985 (pp. 217-229). Routledge.
• Sarotte, M. E. (2001). Dealing with the devil, east Germany, detente and ostpolitik 1969-1973. The University of North Carolina Press.
• Savranskaya, S. & Taubman, W. (2010). Soviet foreign policy, 1962–1975. In M. P.Leffler & O. A. Westad (Eds.). The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume II, Crises and Détente (pp.134-157). Cambridge University Press.
• Schulzinger, R. (2010). D., Détente in the Nixon–Ford years, 1969–1976. In M. P.Leffler & O. A. Westad (Eds.). The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume II, Crises and Détente (pp. 373-395). Cambridge University Press.
• Soutou, G.-H. (2007). The Linkage between European integration and détente: the contrasting approaches of de Gaulle and Pompidou, 1965 to 1974. In N. P. Ludlow (Ed.). European Integration and the Cold War Ostpolitik–Westpolitik, 1965–1973 (pp.11-35). Routledge.
• Stevenson, R. W. (1985). The rise and fall of detente relaxations of tension in US-Soviet relations 1953-84. Macmillan Press.
• Swift, J. (2003). The Palgrave concise historical atlas of the cold war. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Taubman, W. (1982). Stalin’s American policy from entente to detente to cold war. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Trachtenberg, M. (2010). The structure of great power politics, 1963–1975. In M. P.Leffler & O. A. Westad (Eds.). The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume II, Crises and Détente (pp. 482-502). Cambridge University Press.
• Tucker, S. C. (2008). Cold war a student encyclopedia. ABC-Clio.
• White, B. (1992). Britain, detente and changing east-west relations. Routledge.
• White, S. (1985). The Origins of detente the genoa conference and Soviet-western relations 1921-1922. Cambridge University Press.
• Wilkens, A. (2007). New ostpolitik and European integration: concepts and policies in the Brandt era. In N. P.
• Ludlow (Ed.). European Integration and the Cold War Ostpolitik–Westpolitik, 1965–1973 (pp. 67-80). Routledge.
• Williamson, R. D. (2012). First steps toward détente American diplomacy in the Berlin crisis, 1958–1963. Lexington Books.
• Wright, J. (2015). Willy Brandt and Helmut Kohl. In S. Casey & J. Wright (Eds.). Mental Maps in the Era of Détente and the End of the Cold War 1968–91 (pp. 174-194). Palgrave Macmillan.