Araştırma Makalesi

Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.)

Cilt: 64 Sayı: 4 31 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.)

Öz

Branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.) is an unpalatable geophyte that has been increasing spreading in the pastures of Aegean region of Türkiye. To formulate effective management strategies at various growth phases, it is necessary to initiate the germination of dormant seeds. Preliminary experiments indicated that branched asphodel seeds germinated better in darkness than in light. Several dormancy-release techniques were tested to develop a rapid, uniform and better germination protocol for branched asphodel seeds including cold stratification at +4 and -18 °C, mechanical scarification with sandpaper, chemical scarification with sulfuric acid, ethanol or hydrogen peroxide and application of chemicals, i.e., gibberellic acid or potassium nitrate. Chemical scarification with 95% sulfuric acid (for 1 min) or 20 mM or 40 mM hydrogen peroxide (for 24 hours) resulted in the highest germination percentages (over 81.3%) and adequately reduced Mean Germination Time (MGT). While chemical scarification with sulfuric acid for 5, 15, and 30 min also reduced MGT, extending scarification duration beyond one-minute decreased germination rates. Lower germination rates with gibberellic acid treatment and increased germination with scarification methods suggest that the seeds have physical dormancy rather than physiological dormancy. Manual scarification with sandpaper achieved germination rates over 75% and reduced MGT by more than 57%. In conclusion, manual sandpaper application considered to be preferable for avoiding the adverse effects of chemical treatments while providing an acceptable germination rate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Adkins S.W., Naylor J.M., Simpson G.M., 1984. The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua V. Action of ethanol and other organic compounds. Physiologia Plantarum, 62 (1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb05917.x
  2. Alatürk F., Gökkuş A., 2019. Farklı ıslah yöntemlerinin Hıdırellez kamçısı (Asphodelus aestivus Brot.)’nın oranı ile meranın verimi ve ot kalitesine etkileri (The effects of different improvement methods on the ratio of Asphodelus aestivus Brot. yield and quality of hay in rangelands). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (1), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.528972
  3. Anonymous 2022. Asphodelus ramosus L. https://www.gbif.org/species/144101133 (accessed date: 21.12.2022)
  4. Anosheh H.P., Sadeghi H., Emam Y., 2011. Chemical priming with urea and KNO3 enhances maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) seed viability under abiotic stress. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 14, 289–295. doi.org/10.1007/s12892-011-0039-x
  5. Apaydin E., Arabaci G., 2017. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds with HPLC of Asphodelus ramosus and comparison of the results with Allium cepa L. and Allium porrum L. extracts. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 4 (4), 499-505.
  6. • Barba-Espín G., Hernández J.A., Diaz-Vivancos P., 2012. Role of H2O2 in pea seed germination. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 7 (2), 193-195. doi:10.4161/psb.18881 • Bewley J.D., 1997. Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell, 9 (7), 1055-1066. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.7.1055
  7. Chahtane H., Kim W., Lopez-Molina L., 2017. Primary seed dormancy: a temporally multilayered riddle waiting to be unlocked. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68 (4), 857–869. doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw377
  8. Corbineau F., Gouble B., Lecat S., Come D., 1991. Stimulation of germination of dormant oat (Avena sativa L.) seeds by ethanol and other alcohols. Seed Science Research, 1 (1), 21-28. doi:10.1017/

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Herboloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

25 Aralık 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Nisan 2024

Kabul Tarihi

9 Eylül 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 64 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erbaş, F. (2024). Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.). Plant Protection Bulletin, 64(4), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.1473289
AMA
1.Erbaş F. Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.). Plant Protection Bulletin. 2024;64(4):41-49. doi:10.16955/bitkorb.1473289
Chicago
Erbaş, Filiz. 2024. “Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.)”. Plant Protection Bulletin 64 (4): 41-49. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.1473289.
EndNote
Erbaş F (01 Aralık 2024) Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.). Plant Protection Bulletin 64 4 41–49.
IEEE
[1]F. Erbaş, “Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.)”, Plant Protection Bulletin, c. 64, sy 4, ss. 41–49, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.16955/bitkorb.1473289.
ISNAD
Erbaş, Filiz. “Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.)”. Plant Protection Bulletin 64/4 (01 Aralık 2024): 41-49. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.1473289.
JAMA
1.Erbaş F. Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.). Plant Protection Bulletin. 2024;64:41–49.
MLA
Erbaş, Filiz. “Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.)”. Plant Protection Bulletin, c. 64, sy 4, Aralık 2024, ss. 41-49, doi:10.16955/bitkorb.1473289.
Vancouver
1.Filiz Erbaş. Effects of some treatments on seed dormancy in branched asphodel (Asphodelus ramosus L.). Plant Protection Bulletin. 01 Aralık 2024;64(4):41-9. doi:10.16955/bitkorb.1473289

1343513648136501364913445589c73e2330bd.jpg