Araştırma Makalesi

Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences

Cilt: 60 Sayı: 4 31 Aralık 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences

Abstract

Citrus plantations are suffered from many different pest species in East Mediterranean Region. Among them, aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) are one of the important groups. Some species such as Aphis gossypii Glover, Aphis spiraecola Patch, Aphis craccivora Koch, Aphis (Toxoptera) aurantii (Boyer de Fanscolombe) and Myzus (Nectarosiphon) persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) cause harm especially young citrus orchards. This study aimed to investigate regional distribution, seasonal fluctuation, host and host age preferences within citrus species of these aphid species in 15 sub-regions from Adana, Hatay, Osmaniye and Mersin between 2007 and 2009. While the mandarin was more preferred than other citrus species, grapefruit was the least preferred citrus species among in all the three provinces. Among the citrus species in the Mersin region, A. spiraecola was the most common in lemons, while A. (T.) aurantii preferred mandarin compare to others. In Adana and Hatay regions, mandarin was the most preferred citrus species for all aphid species except M. (N.) persicae. Aphid preferences depending on the age showed differences in citrus age scale by region. A. (T.) aurantii, on the other hand, had the highest rate of presence between the ages of 11-20 in Hatay and between the ages 21-40 in Mersin. The prevalence of citrus varieties in Adana and Hatay parallelly affected the distribution of aphids. However, A. spiraecola was dominant aphid species on the lemon. Adana, which has a richer flora compared to Mersin and Hatay regions, has been determined the highest aphid density in different species. The fact that Aphis goosypii and A. spiraecola create up to 30-40% infections rate in citrus orchards not only in spring, but also in July, and intense again in autumn have made these pests harmful for four seasons.

Keywords

Destekleyen Kurum

TüBITAK TOVAG

Proje Numarası

105-O-581

Teşekkür

The authors also wish to thanks to TUBİTAK TOVAG (105-O-581). The authors also would like to extend their thanks to Dr. Işıl ÖZDEMİR, for identification of the aphid specimens.

Kaynakça

  1. Anonymus, 2012. Tarımsal Yapı ve Üretim T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, DİE Matbaası Ankara, 328 s.
  2. Anonymous, 1990. Aphids in Greece Integrated Pest Manegment Approach. ICI Hellas Technical Depertment, 125 p.
  3. Atakan E., Özgür A. F., 1996. Pamuk tarlasında erken mevsimde Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera, Aphididae) ve bunların doğal düşmanlarının popülasyon değişimlerinin araştırılması. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 20 (3): 187-197
  4. Bora T., Karaca İ., 1970. Kültür Bitkilerinde Hastalığın ve Zararın Ölçülmesi. Ege Üniv. Matbaası, Bornova, İzmir, 186 s.
  5. Caballero P., Miguel M. D. De., Julia J. F., 1992. Costes y precios en hortofruticultura. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, 761 p.
  6. Dubey S., Kumar Singh V., 2012. Population Dynamics of Aphis spiraecola Patch (Homoptera: Aphididae) on Medicinal Plant Cosmos Bipinnatus in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Advanced Life Science, 1, 54–58.
  7. Hermoso de Mendoza, A., Pe´rez E., Carbonell E. A., and Real V., 1998. Sampling methods to establish percentages of species and population patterns in citrus aphids, pp. 561-568. In J. M. Nieto and A. G. Dixon [eds.], Aphids in Natural and Managed Ecosystems. Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Aphids. Universidad de Leo´ n, Spain.
  8. Hille Ris Lambers, D., 1950. On Mounting Aphids and Other Soft Skinned Insects. Entomologische Berichten, XIII, 55-58

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Mayıs 2020

Kabul Tarihi

23 Kasım 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 60 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Satar, S., Karacaoğlu, M., Satar, G., & Uygun, N. (2020). Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences. Plant Protection Bulletin, 60(4), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.735958
AMA
1.Satar S, Karacaoğlu M, Satar G, Uygun N. Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences. Plant Protection Bulletin. 2020;60(4):111-119. doi:10.16955/bitkorb.735958
Chicago
Satar, Serdar, Mehmet Karacaoğlu, Gül Satar, ve Nedim Uygun. 2020. “Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences”. Plant Protection Bulletin 60 (4): 111-19. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.735958.
EndNote
Satar S, Karacaoğlu M, Satar G, Uygun N (01 Aralık 2020) Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences. Plant Protection Bulletin 60 4 111–119.
IEEE
[1]S. Satar, M. Karacaoğlu, G. Satar, ve N. Uygun, “Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences”, Plant Protection Bulletin, c. 60, sy 4, ss. 111–119, Ara. 2020, doi: 10.16955/bitkorb.735958.
ISNAD
Satar, Serdar - Karacaoğlu, Mehmet - Satar, Gül - Uygun, Nedim. “Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences”. Plant Protection Bulletin 60/4 (01 Aralık 2020): 111-119. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.735958.
JAMA
1.Satar S, Karacaoğlu M, Satar G, Uygun N. Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences. Plant Protection Bulletin. 2020;60:111–119.
MLA
Satar, Serdar, vd. “Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences”. Plant Protection Bulletin, c. 60, sy 4, Aralık 2020, ss. 111-9, doi:10.16955/bitkorb.735958.
Vancouver
1.Serdar Satar, Mehmet Karacaoğlu, Gül Satar, Nedim Uygun. Citrus aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae): incidence, population fluctuations, host plant and age preferences. Plant Protection Bulletin. 01 Aralık 2020;60(4):111-9. doi:10.16955/bitkorb.735958

Cited By

1343513648136501364913445589c73e2330bd.jpg