Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) resistance to tribenuron methyl in wheat fields of Diyarbakır province, Türkiye

Abstract

Chemical weed control is unavoidable in the fields where weeds cause problems in wheat production. However, resistance problems in weeds arise a few years later especially using herbicides with the same mode of action continuously. Frequent and inappropriate use of herbicides leads to various environmental, health and economic issues, as well as labour losses. Recently, growers complained that tribenuron-methyl (acetolactate synthase - ALS), commonly used to control wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.-SINAR), which is causing problems in the wheat fields of Diyarbakır province, is ineffective. To determine the extent of the problem, wild mustard seeds were collected from 56 suspected wheat fields in 16 districts of Diyarbakır. As a result of applications carried out with the method under controlled conditions, resistance was suspected in the population of 28 fields. The results of the dose-response experiments indicated that no resistance (RI<3) was observed in 20 biotypes, low resistance (3≤ RI<5) was detected in 5 biotypes, and moderate resistance (5 ≤ RI<10) was detected in 3 biotypes.

Keywords

• acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor
• herbicide resistance
• Triticum aestivum L.

Diyarbakır ili buğday tarlalarında yabani hardalın (Sinapis arvensis L.) tribenuron methyl’e karşı dayanıklılık durumu

Öz

Buğday tarımında yabancı otların sorun oluşturduğu alanlarda kimyasal mücadele kaçınılmazdır. Ancak aynı etki mekanizmasına sahip herbisitlerin uzun yıllar kullanılması sonucunda yabancı otlarda dayanıklılık sorunu ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Herbisitlerin sık ve yanlış kullanılması çeşitli çevre ve sağlık sorunlarının yanı sıra iş gücü ve ekonomik kayıpların da yaşanmasına yol açmaktadır. Diyarbakır ili buğday alanlarında sorun oluşturan yabani hardalın (Sinapis arvensis L.- SINAR) kontrolünde yoğun kullanılan tribenuron-methyl (asetolaktat sentaz - ALS)’in etkisiz olduğu üreticiler tarafından bildirilmektedir. Bu bildirimlerin boyutlarını belirlemek amacıyla Diyarbakır’ın 16 ilçesinde buğday ekim alanlarından 56 SINAR tohum popülasyonu toplanmıştır. Kontrollü koşullarda klasik test metoduyla yapılan uygulamalar sonucunda 28 tarlaya ait popülasyonda dayanıklılık şüphesi tespit edilmiştir. Doz-etki denemeleri sonucunda SINAR’ın 20 biyotipinde dayanıklılık (RI<3) görülmezken, 5 biyotipte düşük seviyede (3≤ RI<5), 3 biyotipte ise orta düzeyde dayanıklılık (5 ≤ RI<10) tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitörü
• herbisit dayanıklılığı
• Triticum aestivum L.

Kaynakça

1. Ateş E., 2021. Herbisitlerin etki mekanizması. Weed Science Current Issues. Iksad Publishing House, 387-438, ISBN: 978-625-8061-67-3
2. Ateş E., 2022. Determination of the critical period of weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and investigation of the control methods of wi̇ld mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.). Malatya Turgut Özal University, Graduate Education Institute, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, 130 p., Malatya.
3. Ateş E., Üremi̇ş İ., 2020. Determination of weed species and their frequency and density in wheat cultivation areas of Şanlıurfa province, Türkiye. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 24 (1), 33-43. doi:10.29050/Harranziraat.612049
4. Ateş E., Süer İ.E., Üremiş İ., 2017. Germination biology of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). 3rd ASM International Congress of Agriculture and Environment, 16-18 November 2017, Antalya, Türkiye, 57 p.
5. Chaudhary S.U., Hussain M., Ali M.A., Ali M.A., Iqbal J., 2008. Effect of weed competition period on yield and yield components of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Research, 46 (1), 47-53.
6. Christoffers M.J., Nandula V.K., Howatt K.A., Wehking T.R., 2006, Target-site resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). Weed Science, 54, 191-197.
7. Durigon M.R., Cechin J., Mariani F., da Silva G.B.P., Vargas L., Chavarria G., 2020. Growth of canola hybrids resistant and sensitive to herbicides. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 41 (6Supl2), 2911-2922.
8. FAO, 2022. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Statistics, Production Indices. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QI

9. Gherekhloo J., Hatami Z. M., Cruz R.A., Sadeghipour H.R., Prado R.D., 2018. Continuous use of tribenuron-methyl selected for cross-resistance to acetolactate synthase–inhibiting herbicides in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). Published Online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July.
10. Gökalp Ö., Üremi̇ş İ., 2015. Determination of weed seeds in wheat grain in Mardin province of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Mustafa Kemal University, 20 (1), 23-30. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mkuzfd/issue/19637/209638
11. Gürbüz R., Uygur S., Uygur F.N., 2018. Determination of segetal flora in wheat growing areas of Ağri province. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 21 (1), 8-18.
12. Heap I., 2024. The international herbicide-resistant weed database. Annual Report Online. www.weedscience.org
13. Heravi M., Gherkhloo J., Siahmarguee A., Kazemi H., Hassanpour B.S., 2018. Investigating the resistance of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotypes to tribenuron methyl herbicide in wheat fields of Ramiyan Township. Weed Research Journal, 10 (1), 46-59.
14. HRAC GLOBAL, 2024. Synthetic auxin resistance in wild mustard. http://Hracglobal.Com/Files/Wild-Mustard-Fact-Sheet-June-2024.Pdf, (accessed date: 21.05.2024).
15. Khaledi R., Fayaz F., Kahrizi D., Talebi R., 2019. PCR-based identification of point mutation mediating acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide resistance in weed wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). Molecular Biology Reports, 46, 5113–5121.
16. Mehdi A., Ali G., Mehdi R., Javid G., Goodarz A., 2017. Investigating resistance of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) populations to tribenuron-methyl herbicide. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology (Agriculture Science) Spring, 11 (1), 127-141.
17. Mennan H., Doğan M.N., Yılmaz N.D.K., Çankaya S., Gönen O., 2012. Çeltik ekim alanlarında sorun olan önemli bazı yabancı otların genetik çeşitliklerinin belirlenmesi ve ALS-Accase inhibitörü herbisitlere dayanıklı biyotiplerinini moleküler ve bioassay yöntemlerle saptanması. TÜBİTAK Conclusion Report (108O371), Samsun.
18. Ntoanidou S., Madesis P., Diamantidis G., Eleftherohorinos I., 2017.Trp574 substitution in the acetolactate synthase of Sinapis arvensis confers cross-resistance to tribenuron and imazamox. Medicine, Biology, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, doi:10.1016/J.Pestbp.2016.12.008Corpus ID: 8009705
19. Özaslan C., 2011. Determination of weed species creating problem in cotton and wheat fields of Diyarbakır with fungal factors they host and research on their bio-activity potentials. Selçuk University, Institute of Science, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, 229 p., Konya.
20. Peniuk M.G., Romano M.L., Hall J.C., 1993. Physiological investigations into the resistance of a wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotype to auxinic herbicides. Weed Research, 33 (6), 431-440. doi.Org/10.1111/J.1365-3180.1993. Tb01959.X
21. Preston C., Mallory-Smith C.A., 2001. Biochemical mechanisms, inheritance and molecular genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. In: Herbicide Resistance in World Grains. Powles S.B., Shaner D.L. (Eds.). Boca Raton, CRC Press, 23-60.
22. Ross M.A., Lembi C.A., 1999. Applied weed science. 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 07458.
23. Seefeldt S.S., Gealy D.R., Brewster B.D., Fuerst E.P., 1994. Cross-resistance of several diclofop-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) biotypes from the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Weed Science, 42, 430-437.
24. Serim A.T., Budak İ., Asav Ü., 2022. Isparta ili elma bahçelerinde glyphosate’a dayanıklı pire ot (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist)’larının belirlenmesi. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 9 (1), 564-573. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1106196
25. Şin B., 2021. The determination of tribenuron methyl resistance of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) collected from wheat fields located in Amasya, Çorum, Tokat and Yozgat provinces. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Graduate Education Institute, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis 199 p., Tokat.
26. Topuz M., 2007. Researches on sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in wild mustard Sinapis arvensis L. in wheat fields in the Marmara region of Turkey. Ege University, Institute of Science, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, 202 p., İzmir.
27. Turgut N.Ç., 2023. Determination of the herbicide resistance status of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.), a problem in wheat culturements of the central black sea region, and its growth biology. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Graduate Education Institute, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, 239 p., Samsun.
28. Veldhuis L.J., Hall L.M., O’Donovan J.T., Dyer W., Hall C., 2000. Metabolism-based resistance of a wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotype to ethametsulfuron- methyl. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 2986-2990.
29. Yang Q., Yang X., Zhang Z., Wang J., Fu W., Li Y., 2021. Investigating the resistance levels and mechanisms to penoxsulam and cyhalofop-butyl in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) from Ningxia province, China. Weed Science, 69 (4), 422-429.
30. Yıldız Ş., Koç İ., Yardım E.N., 2017. Investigation on nematode faunal structures in pastures of Muş province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27 (2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.282164