PERSUASION CAPACITY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN DISASTERS

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Administration, Persuasion Capacity, Disaster Administration, Transdisciplinary Study

Persuasion Capacity of Public Administration in Disasters

Öz

The increasing severity of meteorological disasters has made the concept of early-warning within risk governance important. Taking the current knowledge accumulation conditions into consideration, public administration has been focusing mostly on crisis administration when it comes to disasters of which the exact time of happening is unpredictable such as earthquakes. This process has mostly taken place in a "just order and they will do it" manner. Therefore, the literature on the persuasion skills of public administration in disasters is currently not abundant. The theme of the executive persuasion capacity in disasters has not been exclusively and extensively studied regarding the aspects of organizational structures within public administration and the human environment. In fact, administrative persuasion skills to be exercised on the community before disasters to prevent them from being harmed is a subject that needs serious consideration and work. In contrast, the subject of "persuasion" has been studied in depth within business-oriented works that aim to sell products to customers governed by the philosophy that could be depicted as "make them envious and they will buy it". In this article, a survey-based methodical study that utilizes public opinion polling system has been conducted on the persuasion ability of an administrative authority. And the popular methods of the business industry focusing on "how to convince a customer" have been employed. As a whole, this research article features a transdisciplinary study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Administration
• Persuasions Capacity
• Disaster Administration
• Transdisciplinary Syudy

Kaynakça

1. AFAD, 2014. Aciklamali afet yonetimi terimleri sozlugu [Explanotary Disaster Management Glossary]., [Accessed on 30 January 2019].
2. Alberti M., Marzluf, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley G., Ryan, C., and Zumbrunnen, C., 2003. Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. AIBS Bulletin, 53.12: 1169-1179.
3. Amadeo, K., 2019. Hurricane Harvey facts, damage, and costs: https://www.thebalance.com/hurricane-harvey-facts-damage-costs-4150087, accessed on 27.01.2019.
4. Babaoglu, C., and Cobanoglu, S., 2018. Kamu Yönetiminde Postmodern Savlar [Postmodern arguments in public administration]. Journal of Turkish Court of Accounts, 108, pp. 175-189.
5. Bayhan, V., 2002. Risk toplumu [Risk Society]. Dogu Bati Dergisi, 19, pp. 187-202.
6. BBC News, 2017. Why was Houston not evacuated before Hurricane Harvey? [online]. 29 August. Available at: [Accessed on 27 March 2019].
7. BBC News, 2018. Indonesia: Post-earthquake tsunami early warning system was not working. [online] 1 October. Available at: [Accessed on 1 January 2019].
8. BBC News, 2019. Bangkok schools closed over 'unhealthy' pollution levels https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-47057128, accessed on 30.01.2019.

9. BBC News, 2020. Iran plane crash: Ukrainian jet was 'unintentionally' shot down. Available at https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51073621, [Accessed on 24 March 2020)
10. BBC News, 2020. Coronavirus: South Korea church leader apologises for virus spread. [online]. 2 March. Available at: [Accessed on 2 March 2020].
11. CNN Turk, 2018. AFAD ve Meteoroloji'den ust uste uyari [Consecutive Warnings from AFAD and Meteorology.] [online] (Last updated 2.41 PM on 11th December 2019. Available at: [Accessed on 28 October 2018].
12. Cottle, S., 1998. Ulrich Beck, ‘risk society' and the media: A catastrophic view? European Journal of Communication, 13(1), pp. 5-32.
13. Ejupi, V., Siljanovska, L., and Iseni, A., 2014. The mass media and persuasion. European Scientific Journal, 10(14), pp. Ekman, P., 1999. Basic emotions. In: T. Dalgleish, M. J. Power eds. 1999. Handbook of cognition and emotion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. pp. 45-60.
14. Elias, B., 2018. 23 persuasion techniques: How to use psychological persuasion methods for your marketing. Active Campaign, [online] 27 August. Availabe at: [Accessed on 01 January 2019].
15. Geray, C., 2002. Halkla iliskiler [Public Relations]. 3rd ed. Ankara: Imaj Publishing House. Habertürk, 2019. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: "Hortumun zararı 100 milyon TL. [President Erdogan: Damage of the Tornada is 100 Million Turkish Liras]. Available at: https://www.haberturk.com/antalya-haberleri/66405400-cumhurbaskani-erdogan-hortumun-zarari-100-milyon-tl [Accessed on 24 March 2020].
16. Hopmann, D. N., Van Aelst, P. and Legnante, G., 2012. Political balance in the news: A review of concepts, operationalizations, and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), pp. 240-257.
17. Karaman, Z. T., 2018. Effective public policies on early warning at disasters and on the arousal of social awareness. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences, 7(2), pp. 493-517.
18. Karaman, Z. T. 2019. Risk Toplumunda Afetlerde Erken Uyarı, Mukavemetli Toplum ve Kamu Yönetiminin İkna Kapasitesi. [Public Administration's Persuasion Capacity, Resilient Society and Early Warning in Disasters in a Risk Society]. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), 185-212.
19. Oner Y., 2015. Insanları ikna etmenin 6 evrensel kurali [6 Universal Rules to Persuade People]. Uplifers, [online]. Available at: [Accessed on 28 January 2019].
20. Ozturk, E., 2019. Antalya’da hortum dehseti 2 olu, 1 kayip, 15 yarali [Tornado Horror in Antalya: 2 Dead, 1 Missing, 15 Injured]. Sabah Newspaper, [online]. 25 January. Available at: [Accessed on 25 January 2019].
21. Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., and Scherr, S., 2012. Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), pp. 221-239.
22. Sabah Newspaper, 2020. Iranlı unlu kadin spikerler yasananlara tepki gostererek istifa etti! [Famous Iranian Presenter Resigned Protesting What Happened ].
23. [online] Available at: [Accessed on 30 January 2020].
24. Sargut A. S., 2006. Sosyal sermaye: Yapinin sundugu bir olanak mi, yoksa bireyin amacli bir eylemi mi? [Social Capital: Enabling Structures Or Purposive Action?].Akdeniz University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12, pp. 1-13.
25. Solferino, N., Taurino, S. F., and Tessitore, M. E., 2015. Manipulating persuasion in debates: Fact checking’s usefulness. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 447-452.
26. Tasci, D. and Eroglu, E., 2007. Yoneticilerin kisilik ozellikleri ile kullandiklari ikna ve etkileme taktiklerinin kullanim sikligi arasindaki iliskinin degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of Relationship Between Personal Traits of Managers and Frequancy of Usage of Persuasion and Impact Tactics ]. Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 1(17), pp. 533-546.