Araştırma Makalesi

Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm

Öz

SUMMARY Aim: The false negative rate of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in large thyroid nodules ranges from 7.7% to 53%. The treatment of nodules that are 4 cm or larger is controversial because of the potential for false-negative FNAB results. In order to make treatment recommendations for nodules ≥4 cm in size, we compared the results of preoperative FNAB with thyroid surgery specimens. Materials and Methods: We evaluated patients who underwent thyroid surgery and had preoperative FNAB between 2017 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on nodule size (<4 cm and ≥4 cm). FNAB and specimen pathology results of both groups were compared. Results: 982 patients who underwent surgery for nodular disease were evaluated. Patients in the Bethesda 2 group (n=231) were divided into two categories based on nodule size: ≥4 cm (n=56) and <4 cm (n=175). Malignancy rates were higher in the group with tumors smaller than 4 cm. FNAB and specimen results were compared. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.039). Conclusion: The benign fine-needle aspiration biopsy results were consistent with the specimen results in patients with nodules that were 4 cm or larger. Thyroid surgery should not be considered as the initial treatment for nodules ≥4 cm with benign cytology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Altiner, S., Kozan, R., Emral, A. C., Taneri, F., & Karamercan, A. (2022). Effects of patient and tumor characteristics on central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer: a guide for selective node dissection. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 25(11), 730-736.
  2. Amrikachi, M., Ramzy, I., Rubenfeld, S., & Wheeler, T. M. (2001). Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of thyroid: a review of 6226 cases and correlation with surgical or clinical outcome. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 125(4), 484-488.
  3. Baser, O. O., Koseoglu, D., Cetin, Z., Catak, M., & Kizilkaya, H. (2022). Benign cytology does not rule out malignancy in thyroid nodules larger than 4 cm. Diagnostic cytopathology, 50(11), 508-512.
  4. Carrillo, J. F., Frias-Mendivil, M., Ochoa-Carrillo, F. J., & Ibarra, M. (2000). Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid combined with an evaluation of clinical and radiologic factors. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 122(6), 917-921.
  5. Cibas, E. S., Alexander, E. K., Benson, C. B., De Agustín, P. P., Doherty, G. M., Faquin, W. C., Middleton, W. D., Miller, T., Raab, S. S., & White, M. L. (2008). Indications for thyroid FNA and pre‐FNA requirements: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine‐Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagnostic cytopathology, 36(6), 390-399.
  6. Cibas, E. S., & Ali, S. Z. (2017). The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid, 27(11), 1341-1346.
  7. Giles, W. H., Maclellan, R. A., Gawande, A. A., Ruan, D. T., Alexander, E. K., Moore, F. D., & Cho, N. L. (2015). False negative cytology in large thyroid nodules. Annals of surgical oncology, 22, 152-157.
  8. HaugenBryan, R., AlexanderErik, K., BibleKeith, C., DohertyGerard, M., MandelSusan, J., NikiforovYuri, E., RandolphGregory, W., SawkaAnna, M., SchuffKathryn, G., & ShermanSteven, I. (2016). 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Endokrinoloji, Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Ocak 2024

Kabul Tarihi

21 Şubat 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aydoğdu, Y. F., Gülçek, E., Büyükkasap, Ç., & Dikmen, K. (2024). Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm. Balıkesir Medical Journal, 8(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1424770
AMA
1.Aydoğdu YF, Gülçek E, Büyükkasap Ç, Dikmen K. Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm. BMedJ. 2024;8(1):26-34. doi:10.33716/bmedj.1424770
Chicago
Aydoğdu, Yunushan Furkan, Emre Gülçek, Çağrı Büyükkasap, ve Kürşat Dikmen. 2024. “Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm”. Balıkesir Medical Journal 8 (1): 26-34. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1424770.
EndNote
Aydoğdu YF, Gülçek E, Büyükkasap Ç, Dikmen K (01 Nisan 2024) Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm. Balıkesir Medical Journal 8 1 26–34.
IEEE
[1]Y. F. Aydoğdu, E. Gülçek, Ç. Büyükkasap, ve K. Dikmen, “Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm”, BMedJ, c. 8, sy 1, ss. 26–34, Nis. 2024, doi: 10.33716/bmedj.1424770.
ISNAD
Aydoğdu, Yunushan Furkan - Gülçek, Emre - Büyükkasap, Çağrı - Dikmen, Kürşat. “Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm”. Balıkesir Medical Journal 8/1 (01 Nisan 2024): 26-34. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1424770.
JAMA
1.Aydoğdu YF, Gülçek E, Büyükkasap Ç, Dikmen K. Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm. BMedJ. 2024;8:26–34.
MLA
Aydoğdu, Yunushan Furkan, vd. “Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm”. Balıkesir Medical Journal, c. 8, sy 1, Nisan 2024, ss. 26-34, doi:10.33716/bmedj.1424770.
Vancouver
1.Yunushan Furkan Aydoğdu, Emre Gülçek, Çağrı Büyükkasap, Kürşat Dikmen. Malignancy rates in thyroid nodules classified as benign according to the nodule size threshold of 4 cm. BMedJ. 01 Nisan 2024;8(1):26-34. doi:10.33716/bmedj.1424770

Cited By