Determining the Awareness and Attitudes of Professionals Working with Individuals with Special Needs Towards Alternative and Augmentative Communicatıion Systems
Öz
Aim: The study aimed to determine the awareness levels and attitudes of professionals working with individuals with special needs towards Alternative and Augmentative Communication Systems.
Material and Method: The study included 194 professionals aged between 21 and 67, working at special education and rehabilitation centers in Ankara. Participants were administered a sociodemographic information form and the Attitude Scale for Alternative and Augmentative Communication Systems. The data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics IBM Version 26.0 software.
Results: In our study, it was found that professionals aged 35-40, women, those with a doctoral level of education, and professionals with more than 10 years of experience working with individuals with special needs had higher scores on the Attitude Scale for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems. On the other hand, no statistically significant difference was found in attitude scale scores in terms of variables such as professional groups, attending courses related to augmentative communication systems, participation in special augmentative communication system courses, and the implementation of augmentative communication systems.
Conclusion: Training programs designed for professionals from various disciplines working with individuals with special needs may benefit from including more comprehensive information and practical opportunities related to augmentative and alternative communication systems. This could enable professionals to establish more effective and meaningful interactions with these individuals.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Individuals with special needs, Communication, Alternative communication
Destekleyen Kurum
This work has not received any support or assistance.
Etik Beyan
The study was approved by the Lokman Hekim University Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Registration Number: 2023/219: Approval Date: 01.02.2023) and was implemented within the framework of ethical rules established according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Teşekkür
We thank all participants who contributed to our research.
Kaynakça
- Aldabas, R. (2021). Barriers and facilitators of using augmentative and alternative communication with students with multiple disabilities in inclusive education: Special education teachers’ perspectives.
- International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(9), 1010-1026. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1597185
- Beukelman, D. (1987). When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 94-95. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)
- Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed., pp. 632-638). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
- Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37(3), 32-48. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/022)
- Dietz, A., Wallace, S. E., & Weissling, K. (2020). Revisiting the role of augmentative and alternative communication in aphasia rehabilitation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(2), 909-913. doi:10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00041
- Dowden, P., & Marriner, N. (1995). Augmentative and alternative communication: Treatment principles and strategies. Seminars in Speech and Language, 16, 140-156. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1064116
- Ege, P. (2006). Farklı engel gruplarının iletişim özellikleri ve öğretmenlere öneriler. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 1-23. doi:10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000099
- Langarika-Rocafort, A., Mondragon, N. I., & Etxebarrieta, G. R. (2021). A systematic review of research on augmentative and alternative communication interventions for children aged 6–10 in the last decade.
- Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(3), 899-916. doi:10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00005