Araştırma Makalesi

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS

Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2 15 Haziran 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS

Öz

Objective: Dorsal wrist masses are a common cause of wrist pain, most frequently represented by ganglion cysts (GC) and carpal boss (CB), and may be difficult to differentiate clinically. This study aimed to compare the demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of patients with GC or CB, to identify parameters useful for differential diagnosis, and to determine the relative proportion of CB among symptomatic dorsal wrist masses.
Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients aged 18-65 years who presented with wrist pain and were diagnosed with either GC (n=1058) or CB (n=114) on magnetic resonance imaging between 2021 and 2025. Demographic data, lesion characteristics, visual analogue scale (VAS), wrist range of motion (ROM), mass localization, concomitant radiological findings, treatment methods, recurrence rates, and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were recorded.
Results: The mean age was significantly lower in the GC group (35.2±10.5 vs. 48.7±12.3 years; p<0.001). Pain was significantly lower in the GC group (p=0.01). GC were most commonly located at the scapholunate interval, and CB were predominantly identified at the second and third carpometacarpal joints (p<0.001). CB caused more restricted ROM and concomitant osteoarthritic changes (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, mass localization, and ROM were independent predictors. Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the GC group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: CB constituted a higher proportion of symptomatic dorsal wrist masses than previously expected. Age, mass localization, and ROM should therefore be carefully considered in the differential diagnosis of dorsal wrist masses, particularly when evaluating suspected GC.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Ethic committee approval was obtained from the Bilecik Seyh Edebali University School of Medicine Ethics Committee (Decision No: 381563, Date: 06.01.2026).

Teşekkür

We thank Utkan Sobay, M.D., and Erkam Çeker, M.D., for their contributions to the evaluation of the patients.

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Moellhoff N, Throner V, Frank K, Benne A, Adelmann S, Coenen M et al. Visualization of the location and level of pain in common wrist pathologies using color-coded heatmaps. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(2):1095-102.
  2. 2. Poh F. Carpal boss in chronic wrist pain and its association with partial osseous coalition and osteoarthritis-a case report with focus on MRI findings. Indian J Radiol Imaging. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.; 2015;25(03):276-9.
  3. 3. Goller SS, Kajdi GW, Feuerriegel GC, Sutter R. Radiopalmar ganglion cysts: prevalence, morphology, and clinical significance in wrist MRI. Eur Radiol. Springer; 2024;34(12):7869-77.
  4. 4. Bo Eissa AN, Almulhum AK, Alsaeed MN, Buanq AA. A rare case of carpal boss lesion with an overlying ganglion cyst: case report and literature review. J Surg Case Rep. 2024;2024(5):rjae287.
  5. 5. Zanetti M, Saupe N, Nagy L. Role of MR imaging in chronic wrist pain. Eur Radiol. Springer; 2007;17(4):927-38.
  6. 6. Mespreuve M, De Smet L, De Cuyper K, Waked K, Vanhoenacker F. MRI diagnosis of carpal boss and comparison with radiography. Acta Radiol. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England; 2017;58(10):1245-51.
  7. 7. Goiney C, Porrino J, Richardson ML, Mulcahy H, Chew FS. Characterization and Epidemiology of the Carpal Boss Utilizing Computed Tomography. J Wrist Surg. 2017;6(1):22-32.
  8. 8. Park MJ, Namdari S, Weiss A-P. The carpal boss: review of diagnosis and treatment. J Hand Surg. Elsevier; 2008;33(3):446-9.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ortopedi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Haziran 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Şubat 2026

Kabul Tarihi

16 Mart 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gedikbaş, M., & Öztürk, T. (2026). CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 16(2), 274-281. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.1884048
AMA
1.Gedikbaş M, Öztürk T. CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 2026;16(2):274-281. doi:10.16919/bozoktip.1884048
Chicago
Gedikbaş, Mete, ve Tahir Öztürk. 2026. “CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 16 (2): 274-81. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.1884048.
EndNote
Gedikbaş M, Öztürk T (01 Haziran 2026) CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 16 2 274–281.
IEEE
[1]M. Gedikbaş ve T. Öztürk, “CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS”, Bozok Tıp Dergisi, c. 16, sy 2, ss. 274–281, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.16919/bozoktip.1884048.
ISNAD
Gedikbaş, Mete - Öztürk, Tahir. “CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 16/2 (01 Haziran 2026): 274-281. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.1884048.
JAMA
1.Gedikbaş M, Öztürk T. CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 2026;16:274–281.
MLA
Gedikbaş, Mete, ve Tahir Öztürk. “CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, c. 16, sy 2, Haziran 2026, ss. 274-81, doi:10.16919/bozoktip.1884048.
Vancouver
1.Mete Gedikbaş, Tahir Öztürk. CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF GANGLION CYSTS AND CARPAL BOSS. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 01 Haziran 2026;16(2):274-81. doi:10.16919/bozoktip.1884048