Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Relation between Military Expenditure and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16, 229 - 236, 31.07.2019

Öz

After
the Second World War, especially in the Cold War era, military expenditures
increased worldwide and it has reached its highest levels in the late 1980s.
The countries have revised their national security policies due to the
increasing terrorist attacks in the following period. Turkey is located in the
Middle East is experiencing an intense battle and hence the existence of a
strong army has a vital importance for Turkey. The share of military spending
in Turkey’s economy is very high because of long-standing terrorist incidents
and being an important force in the region. The relationship between economic
growth and defense spending is analyzed by using annual data for the 1968-2017
periods in Turkey. The short- and long-term causality relationships between
related variables are examined by means of using the frequency domain causality
test suggested by Breitung and Candelon (2006). We find evidence in favor of
the causal link running from military expenditures to economic growth. The impulse-responses
analysis results suggest that the responses of the GDP to an unexpected
military spending are negative and statistically significant in the long-term.

Kaynakça

  • Ball, N. (1983). Defense and development: A critique of benoit study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 31(3), 507-524.
  • Bektaş, G. (2017). Savunma harcamalarının ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tekirdağ: Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi.
  • Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363-378.
  • Chan, S. (1987). Military expenditures and economic performance in World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfer. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.
  • Chowdhury, A. R. (1991). A casual analysis of defense spending and economic growth. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(1), 80-97.
  • Davis, D. R., & Chan, S. (1990). The security welfare relationship: Longitudinal evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Peace Research, 27(1), 87-100.
  • Değer, S. (1986). Economic development and defense expenditure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35(1), 179-196.
  • Dunne, J. P, & Üye, M. (2009). Military spending and development. Working Papers, No: 0902, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
  • Dunne, J. P., & Nikolaidou, E. (2005). Military spending and economic growth in Greece, Portugal and Spain. Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 2(1), 1-17
  • Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 304-324.
  • Hatemi-J, A., Chang, T., Chen, W-Y., Lin, F-L., & Gupta, R. (2018). Asymmetric causality between military expenditures and economic growth in top six defense spenders. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 52(3), 1193-1207.
  • Hosoya, Y. (2001). Elimination of third-series effect and defining partial measures of causality. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 22: 537-554.
  • Huang, C., & Mintz, A. (1990). Ridge regression analysis of the defence-growth tradeoff in the United States. Defence Economics, 2 (1), 29-37.
  • Islam, M. O. (2015). The relation between military expenditure and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from a panel of 41 developing countries. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(4), 57-65.
  • Kalyoncu, H., & Yücel, F. (2006). An analytical approach on defense expenditure and economic growth: The case of Turkey and Greece. Journal of Economic Studies, 33(5), 336-343.
  • Koban, E. (1998). Savunma harcamalari, ekonomik etkileri ve Türkiye’deki gelişimi. Genelkurmay Askeri Tarih ve Stratejik Etüt Başkanlığı, Ankara; Sayı: 355.
  • Kollias, C. (1997). Defence spending and growth in Turkey 1954-1993: A causal analysis. Defence and Peace Economics, 8(2), 189-204.
  • Kollias, C., Manolas, G., & Paleologou, S. M. (2004). Defence expenditure and economic growth in the European Union: A causality analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(5), 553-569.
  • Looney, R. E. (1988). Third world military expenditure and arms production. London: Macmillan, 1988.
  • Sezgin, S. (1997). Country survey X: Defence spending in Turkey. Defence and Peace Economics, 8(4), 381-409.
  • Sezgin, S. (2001). An empirical analysis of turkey’s defence-growth relationships with a multi-equation model (1956-1994). Defence and Peace Economics, 12(1), 69-86.
  • SIPRI [Stockholm International Peace Research Institute] (2019). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. (Erişim: 01.03.2019), https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex
  • Yakovlev, P. (2007). Arms trade, military spending, and economic growth. Defence and Peace Economics, 18(4), 317-338.
  • Yılancı, V., & Özcan, B. (2010). Yapısal kırılmalar altında Türkiye için savunma harcamaları ile GSMH arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 21-33.

Savunma Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16, 229 - 236, 31.07.2019

Öz

İkinci
Dünya Savaşı sonrasında özellikle Soğuk Savaş dönemi ile birlikte savunma
harcamalarında dünya genelinde artış görülmüş ve savunma harcamaları 1980’lerin
sonunda en üst seviyelere yükselmiştir. Sonraki dönemde artan terör saldırıları
ile ülkeler milli güvenlik politikalarının revize etmişlerdir. Türkiye
savaşların yoğun bir şekilde yaşandığı Ortadoğu’da yer almakta ve bu nedenle
güçlü bir ordunun varlığı Türkiye için hayati bir önem sahiptir. Gerek uzun
yıllardır süren terör olayları gerekse bölgede önemli bir güç olması nedeniyle
savunma harcamalarının Türkiye ekonomisi içerisindeki payı oldukça fazladır.
Çalışmada savunma harcamaları ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki 1968-2017
dönemi Türkiye özelinde yıllık veriler kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Analizde
ilgili değişkenler arasındaki kısa ve uzun dönemli nedensellik ilişkisi
Breitung ve Candelon (2006) tarafından geliştirilen frekans alanında
nedensellik testi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda Türkiye
ekonomisinde savunma harcamalarından ekonomik büyümeye yönelik tek yönlü bir
nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Etki-tepki analizi sonuçları savunma
harcamalarındaki beklenmedik bir artışa GSYİH’nin vermiş olduğu tepkinin uzun
dönemde negatif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğunu göstermektedir.  

Kaynakça

  • Ball, N. (1983). Defense and development: A critique of benoit study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 31(3), 507-524.
  • Bektaş, G. (2017). Savunma harcamalarının ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tekirdağ: Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi.
  • Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363-378.
  • Chan, S. (1987). Military expenditures and economic performance in World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfer. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.
  • Chowdhury, A. R. (1991). A casual analysis of defense spending and economic growth. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(1), 80-97.
  • Davis, D. R., & Chan, S. (1990). The security welfare relationship: Longitudinal evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Peace Research, 27(1), 87-100.
  • Değer, S. (1986). Economic development and defense expenditure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35(1), 179-196.
  • Dunne, J. P, & Üye, M. (2009). Military spending and development. Working Papers, No: 0902, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
  • Dunne, J. P., & Nikolaidou, E. (2005). Military spending and economic growth in Greece, Portugal and Spain. Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 2(1), 1-17
  • Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 304-324.
  • Hatemi-J, A., Chang, T., Chen, W-Y., Lin, F-L., & Gupta, R. (2018). Asymmetric causality between military expenditures and economic growth in top six defense spenders. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 52(3), 1193-1207.
  • Hosoya, Y. (2001). Elimination of third-series effect and defining partial measures of causality. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 22: 537-554.
  • Huang, C., & Mintz, A. (1990). Ridge regression analysis of the defence-growth tradeoff in the United States. Defence Economics, 2 (1), 29-37.
  • Islam, M. O. (2015). The relation between military expenditure and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from a panel of 41 developing countries. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(4), 57-65.
  • Kalyoncu, H., & Yücel, F. (2006). An analytical approach on defense expenditure and economic growth: The case of Turkey and Greece. Journal of Economic Studies, 33(5), 336-343.
  • Koban, E. (1998). Savunma harcamalari, ekonomik etkileri ve Türkiye’deki gelişimi. Genelkurmay Askeri Tarih ve Stratejik Etüt Başkanlığı, Ankara; Sayı: 355.
  • Kollias, C. (1997). Defence spending and growth in Turkey 1954-1993: A causal analysis. Defence and Peace Economics, 8(2), 189-204.
  • Kollias, C., Manolas, G., & Paleologou, S. M. (2004). Defence expenditure and economic growth in the European Union: A causality analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(5), 553-569.
  • Looney, R. E. (1988). Third world military expenditure and arms production. London: Macmillan, 1988.
  • Sezgin, S. (1997). Country survey X: Defence spending in Turkey. Defence and Peace Economics, 8(4), 381-409.
  • Sezgin, S. (2001). An empirical analysis of turkey’s defence-growth relationships with a multi-equation model (1956-1994). Defence and Peace Economics, 12(1), 69-86.
  • SIPRI [Stockholm International Peace Research Institute] (2019). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. (Erişim: 01.03.2019), https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex
  • Yakovlev, P. (2007). Arms trade, military spending, and economic growth. Defence and Peace Economics, 18(4), 317-338.
  • Yılancı, V., & Özcan, B. (2010). Yapısal kırılmalar altında Türkiye için savunma harcamaları ile GSMH arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 21-33.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Emrah İsmail Çevik 0000-0002-8155-1597

Gürsel Bektaş Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-8155-1597

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2019
Kabul Tarihi 30 Temmuz 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16

Kaynak Göster

APA Çevik, E. İ., & Bektaş, G. (2019). Savunma Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(16), 229-236.