SPOR ODAKLI REKREASYON ALANLARININ TOPLUMSAL SAĞLIK VE SOSYAL ETKİLEŞİM ÜZERİNDEKİ ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışma, spor odaklı rekreasyon alanlarının toplumsal sağlık ve sosyal etkileşim üzerindeki rolünü kapsamlı bir şekilde ele almaktadır. Araştırma, spor temelli rekreasyon alanlarının bireylerin fiziksel sağlıklarını iyileştirme, ruhsal sağlığı destekleme ve toplumsal dayanışmayı güçlendirme potansiyeline odaklanmaktadır. Araştırmada, spor odaklı rekreasyon alanlarının, bireylerin fiziksel aktiviteye katılımını nasıl teşvik ettiği ve bu alanlarda sağlanan sosyal etkileşimlerin toplumsal sağlığa olan etkileri yordanarak, konuyla ilgili literatürde yer alan 42 çalışmaya araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan araştırma soruları çerçevesinde MAxqda programından yararlanılarak içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Kentleşme sürecinde yeşil alanların azalması ve spor alanlarına erişimdeki eşitsizlikler, bireylerin fiziksel aktivite alışkanlıklarını olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Araştırma, düşük gelirli bölgelerde kamuya açık spor alanlarının artırılmasının, dezavantajlı grupların fiziksel aktiviteye katılımını destekleyeceğini, spor alanlarının eşit dağılımının, toplum genelinde sağlıklı yaşam alışkanlıklarının yayılmasına katkıda bulunacağını belirtmektedir. Çalışmada, katılım engelleri (fiziksel, ekonomik, sosyal ve psikolojik) ve tercih etkenleri (çevresel özellikler, hizmet kalitesi, sosyal olanaklar ve güvenlik) ayrıntılı bir şekilde ele alınmıştır. Kentleşmenin getirdiği yeşil alan eksikliği ve spor tesislerine erişim eşitsizlikleri, fiziksel aktivite alışkanlıklarını olumsuz etkileyen temel faktörlerdir. Rekreasyon alanlarının erişilebilirliği ve kalitesi, bireylerin bu alanlardan daha etkin bir şekilde yararlanmalarını sağlamaktadır. Sosyal aktiviteler ve grup sporları, bireylerin yalnızlık ve sosyal izolasyon sorunlarını azaltarak toplumsal dayanışmayı desteklemektedir. Sonuç olarak, spor odaklı rekreasyon alanları bireylerin fiziksel ve ruhsal sağlığını desteklerken toplumsal uyumu artıran mekanlar olarak modern kentleşmede kritik bir role sahiptir. Yerel yönetimlerin ve kent planlamacılarının, bu alanların erişilebilirliğini artırarak toplumsal refahı destekleyecek stratejiler geliştirmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• spor odaklı rekreasyon
• rekreasyon alanları
• toplumsal sağlık

THE ROLE OF SPORTS-BASED RECREATION AREAS IN PUBLIC HEALTH AND SOCIAL INTERACTION

Öz

This study comprehensively addresses the role of sports-based recreation areas on social health and social interaction. The study focuses on the potential of sports-based recreation areas to improve individuals' physical health, support mental health and strengthen social solidarity. In the study, how sports-based recreation areas encourage individuals' participation in physical activity and the effects of social interactions provided in these areas on social health were predicted, and content analysis was conducted using the MAxqda program within the framework of the research questions prepared by the researcher for 42 studies in the literature on the subject. The decrease in green areas and inequalities in access to sports areas in the urbanization process negatively affect individuals' physical activity habits. The study states that increasing public sports areas in low-income regions will support the participation of disadvantaged groups in physical activity, and the equal distribution of sports areas will contribute to the spread of healthy living habits throughout the society. In the study, participation barriers (physical, economic, social and psychological) and preference factors (environmental characteristics, service quality, social facilities and security) were discussed in detail. The lack of green areas brought about by urbanization and inequalities in access to sports facilities are the main factors that negatively affect physical activity habits. The accessibility and quality of recreational areas allow individuals to benefit from these areas more effectively. Social activities and group sports support social solidarity by reducing the problems of loneliness and social isolation of individuals. As a result, sports-oriented recreational areas have a critical role in modern urbanization as spaces that increase social harmony while supporting the physical and mental health of individuals. It is recommended that local governments and urban planners develop strategies that will support social welfare by increasing the accessibility of these areas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sports-based recreation
• recreation areas
• public health

Kaynakça

1. Mammadova A. (2023). Spor alanlarının toplumsal refah üzerine etkileri. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi.14(1), 45-58.
2. Czupich M. (2020). Sport as an instrument of social development the example of London. Journal of Physical Education & Sport. 20(4). 1572-1577.
3. Elsborg P., Nielsen G., Klinker CD., Melby PS., Christensen JH., Bentsen P. (2019). Sports-based recreation as a means to address social inequity in health: why, when, where, who, what, and how. BioMed Central Public Health. 19(1), 1084.
4. Marlier M., Cardon G., De Bourdeaudhuij I., Willem A. (2014). A capacity building approach to increase sports participation in disadvantaged urban communities: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 91(6), 1114–1128.
5. Gilchrist P., Wheaton B. (2017). The social benefits of informal and lifestyle sports: a research agenda. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 9(1), 1–10.
6. Corvino C., D’Angelo C., Gozzoli C. (2023). Social work and social inclusion in sports-based programs: A qualitative study. Journal of Social Work. 23(6), 1099-1117.
7. Vella SA., Cliff DP., Magee CA., Okely AD. (2022). Sports participation and health outcomes in youth: A systematic review. Journal of Youth & Adolescence.
8. Richards J. (2011). Evaluation of the impact of a sport-development intervention on the physical and mental health of young adolescents in Gulu, Uganda, a post-conflict setting in a low-income country. Doctoral dissertation. Oxford University, England.

9. Zou X., Kayani S., Wang J., Imran M., Zagalaz Sánchez ML., Amador Jesús L. S., Qurban, H. (2019). A study on the relationship between urban residents' perceptions and participation in recreational sports: based on gender differences. Sustainability. 11 (19), 5466.
10. Hoekman R., Breedveld K., Kraaykamp G. (2017). Sport participation and the social and physical environment: explaining differences between urban and rural areas in the Netherlands. Leisure Studies. 36(3), 357–370.
11. Krippendorff K. (1980). Content analysis: an ıntroduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
12. Gordon-Larsen P., Monda KL., Stevens J. (2007). China’s transition: the effect of rapid urbanization on adult occupational physical activity. Social Science & Medicine. 64(10), 2202–2215.
13. Huang NC., Kung SF., Hu SC. (2018). The relationship between urbanization, the built environment, and physical activity among older adults in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(5), 836.
14. Boakye K. (2022). Urbanization, the built environment, and physical activity. Oregon State University.
15. Chen J., Chen S., Landry PF., Davis DS. (2014). How dynamics of urbanization affect physical and mental health in urban China. The China Quarterly. 218, 1017–1044.
16. McCloskey ML., Tarazona-Meza CE., Tarazona-Meza CE. (2017). Disparities in dietary intake and physical activity patterns across the urbanization divide in the Peruvian Andes. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 14(5), 455–462.
17. Lee KJ., Kim J., Chen N., Kim CG. (2021). The moderating effect of urbanization on the association between socioeconomic status and physical activity in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study. Exercise Science. 30(4), 361–373.
18. Boakye K., Bovbjerg M., Schuna Jr J., Branscum A. (2023). Urbanization and physical activity in the global prospective urban and rural epidemiology study. Scientific Reports. 13, 26406.
19. Phillips DR. (1993). Urbanization and human health. Parasitology. 106(1), 101-112.
20. Liu H., Walker GJ. (2015). The effects of urbanization, motivation, and constraint on Chinese people's leisure-time physical activity. Leisure Sciences. 37(6), 562–576.
21. MacGregor J., Risisky D., & McGinniss K. (2020). Recreational sport opportunities for youth with disabilities: Perspectives of recreation directors in New England. The Sport Journal, 24.
22. Martensson F., Jansson M. (2014). Urban green spaces as spaces of wellbeing. Journal of Environmental Psychology.
23. Jiang Z., Yin J. (2022). Role of program curriculum in building social skills and sports coaching in academic and career development under sports humanities and sociology. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 852331.
24. Suzuki N. (2017). A capability approach to understanding sport for social inclusion: Agency, structure and organisations. Social Inclusion. 5(2), 150-158.
25. Park H. (2022). Participatory city branding through community-based sport and recreational physical activity: A case study of Ottawa. University of Ottawa Repository.
26. Johnson U., Hertting K., Ivarsson A., Lindgren EC. (2022). Favorable Adaptation during SARS-CoV-2-pandemic as told by student-athletes-a longitudinal and behavioral study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(19), 12512.
27. Beutler I. (2008). Sport serving development and peace: Achieving the goals of the United Nations through sport. Sport in Society, 11(4), 359–369.
28. Turaç G. (2023). Türkiye’de spor hizmet politikaları: sağlık ve zindelik tesisleri modeli. İstanbul Üniversitesi- Cerrahpaşa, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Spor Yönetim Bilimleri ABD. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul.
29. Sanatkhah A. (2021). Sociology and sport, the analysis of social grounds affecting the tendency of citizens toward the public sport in Iran: case study: the City of Kerman in 2020.
30. Demir ÖÜA. (2022). Spor bilimleri alanında uluslararası araştırmalar. Eğitim Yayınevi.
31. Demirci N., Yıldırım İ., Toptaş Demirci P., Ersöz Y. (2018). Why should we do physical activity? more active people for a healthier world. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences. 1(2), 1-14.
32. Horozoğlu MA., Gündüz G. (2024). Fitness ile aktif olarak ilgilenen bireylerde sosyal medya bağımlılığı, sosyal medya tükenmişliği ve egzersiz bağlılığı arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 7(2), 351-364.
33. Khazova SA., Begidova SN., Lyakh GY., Klimenko AA., Mamadiev AK. (2019). Designing sports and recreation content to support development of competitiveness among students. İçinde: Bataev DK. (Editör). Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Future Academy.
34. Mastnak W. (2017). Sports and martial arts activities for public health purposes: The musician's risk profiles and exercise-based health care as a model. Journal of Public Health. 25, 231-241.
35. Spaaij R. (2011). The social ımpact of sport: cross-cultural perspectives. 1. Baskı. Routledge.
36. Yılmaz S. (2023). Scientific approaches in landscape architecture. Livre de Lyon.
37. Van Hoye A., Johnson S., Geidne S., Donaldso, A., Rostan F., Lemonnier F., Vuillemin A. (2021). The health promoting sports club model: an intervention planning framework. Health Promotion International. 36(3), 811–823.
38. Manzheley IV. (2013). Environmental approach in formation of sports lifestyle of young students. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. http://www.teoriya.ru/en/node/1704 [Erişim Tarihi: 21.10.2024].
39. Aydın E., Kara H. (2012). Rekreasyon alanlarına katılımı etkileyen psikolojik faktörler. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 5(2), 145–158.
40. Öztürk S., Güler A. (2014). Rekreasyon alanlarında hizmet kalitesinin katılım üzerindeki etkisi. Toplum ve Spor Dergisi. 3(4), 82–95.
41. Demir M., Kocabaş A. (2015). Fiziksel aktivite alanlarının güvenlik ve erişilebilirlik boyutu. Kent Yayınları.
42. Jackson EL. (1983). Activity‐specific barriers to recreation participation. Leisure Sciences. 6(1), 47–60.
43. Özdemir H. (2016). Ekonomik durumun rekreasyon alanlarına katılım üzerindeki etkisi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi. 12(2), 25–40.
44. Wright BA., Goodale TL. (1991). Beyond non-participation: Validation of interest and frequency of participation categories in constraints research. Journal of Leisure Research. 23(4), 314-331.
45. Yıldız F., Bayram S. (2018). Rekreasyon alanlarının sosyo-kültürel etkenler çerçevesinde kullanım eğilimleri. Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 11(1), 30–48.
46. Hultsman WZ. (1993). The influence of others as a barrier to recreation participation among early adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research. 25(2), 150-164.
47. Crawford DW., Godbey G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences. 9(2), 119-127.
48. Güler N., Özdemir R. (2015). Doğal rekreasyon alanlarının tercih edilme nedenleri üzerine bir araştırma. Çevre ve Rekreasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi. 4(1), 55–70.
49. Tsai EH., Coleman DJ. (2007). Preferences for active recreation and perceived constraints to regular active recreation participation: A cross‐cultural study of Hong Kong and Australian university students. Leisure. 31,155- 189.
50. Temple VA. (2007). Barriers, enjoyment, and preference for physical activity among adults with intellectual disability. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 30(4), 281–287.
51. Ghimire R., Poudyal NC. (2014). An analysis of perceived constraints to outdoor recreation participation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 32(4), 52-67.
52. Delaney L., Fahey T. (2005). Social and economic value of sport in Ireland. Economic and Social Research Institute.