TikTok Bağımlılık Ölçeği Türkçe Versiyonu: Kültürel Uyarlama ve Geçerlilik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı TikTok Bağımlılığı Ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamak ve Türkçe konuşan TikTok kullanıcılarında ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini değerlendirmektir. Araştırmaya, en az 12 aydır TikTok kullanan, 18–27 yaş aralığında 229 katılımcı (117 erkek, 112 kadın) dahil edilmiştir. Katılım gönüllülük esasına dayanmış ve veriler Google Forms aracılığıyla çevrim içi olarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 22.0 ve AMOS programları kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin özgün altı faktörlü yapısının Türk örnekleminde doğrulanıp doğrulanmadığını değerlendirmek amacıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) gerçekleştirilmiştir. İç tutarlılık Cronbach alfa katsayısı ve düzeltilmiş madde-toplam korelasyonlarıyla, ayırt edicilik alt ve üst %27'lik grupların karşılaştırılmasıyla, zamana karşı kararlılık ise test-tekrar test analizi ve sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) ile değerlendirilmiştir. DFA sonuçları altı faktörlü modelin verilerle iyi uyum gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur (χ² = 103,127; df = 75; χ²/df = 1,375; CFI = ,987; GFI = ,945; NFI = ,956; IFI = ,988; TLI = ,982; RMSEA = ,041; RMR = ,016). Standartlaştırılmış faktör yükleri ,812 ile ,910 arasında değişmiştir. Ölçeğin genel Cronbach alfa katsayısı ,894, alt boyutların güvenirlik katsayıları ise ,830 ile ,936 arasında bulunmuştur. Düzeltilmiş madde-toplam korelasyonları ,492–,670 arasında değişmiş ve alt ve üst %27'lik gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılıklar saptanmıştır (p < ,001). Toplam ölçek için test-tekrar test güvenirliği de yüksek bulunmuştur (ICC = ,928). Bulgular, TikTok Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun genç yetişkin TikTok kullanıcılarında faktör geçerliği, iç tutarlılık, ayırt edicilik ve zamana karşı kararlılık açısından güçlü psikometrik özellikler gösterdiğini desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kültürel uyarlama
• TikTok
• bağımlılık
• ölçek

TikTok Addiction Scale Turkish Version: Cultural Adaptation and Validation

Öz

This study aimed to adapt the TikTok Addiction Scale into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties among Turkish-speaking TikTok users. The study included 229 participants (117 men and 112 women) aged 18–27 years who had used TikTok for at least 12 months. Participation was voluntary, and data were collected through an online survey administered via Google Forms. Data were analysed using SPSS 22.0 and AMOS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine whether the original six-factor structure of the scale was supported in the Turkish sample. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and corrected item-total correlations, discriminative validity was examined by comparing the lower and upper 27% score groups, and temporal stability was assessed through test-retest analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). CFA results indicated that the six-factor model demonstrated a good fit to the data (χ² = 103.127, df = 75, χ²/df = 1.375, CFI = .987, GFI = .945, NFI = .956, IFI = .988, TLI = .982, RMSEA = .041, and RMR = .016). Standardized factor loadings ranged from .812 to .910. The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .894), while the subscale coefficients ranged from .830 to .936. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from .492 to .670, and significant differences were observed between the lower and upper 27% groups (p < .001). The total scale also demonstrated high test-retest reliability (ICC = .928). Overall, the findings support the factorial validity, internal consistency, discriminative ability, and temporal stability of the Turkish version of the TikTok Addiction Scale among young adult TikTok users.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• TikTok
• addiction
• scale
• cultural adaptation

Kaynakça

1. Al-Menayes, J. (2014). The relationship between mobile social media use and academic performance in university students. New Media and Mass Communication, 25(2), 23-29.
2. Anderson, K. E. (2020). Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: It is time to talk about TikTok. Library Hi Tech News, 37(4), 7–12.
3. Atteh, E., Assan-Donkoh, I., Mensah, Y. A., Boadi, A., Badzi, S. C., & Lawer, V. T. (2020). A thoughtful overview of social media usage among students and its impact on their academic work. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 8(3), 30-39.
4. Barry, C. T., Berbano, M. I., Anderson, A., & Levy, S. (2024). Psychology Tok: Use of TikTok, Mood, and Self-Perception in a Sample of College Students. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 9, 724-734.
5. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
6. Cokmus, F. P., Cayli, S. B. D., & Aydin, O. (2026). The psychometric validity of the TikTok Addiction Scale Turkish version: The relationship between TikTok addiction, stress, and personality. The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital, 60(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2026.97355
7. Çömlekçi, M. F., & Başol, O. (2019). Gençlerin sosyal medya kullanım amaçları ile sosyal medya bağımlılığı ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(4), 173-188.
8. De Leyn, T., De Wolf, R., Vanden Abeele, M., & De Marez, L. (2021). In-between child’s play and teenage pop culture: tweens, TikTok & privacy. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(8), 1108–1125.

9. Eghtesadi, M., & Florea, A. (2020). Facebook, Instagram, Reddit and TikTok: a proposal for health authorities to integrate popular social media platforms in contingency planning amid a global pandemic outbreak. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 111(3), 389-391.
10. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th Edition). SAGE Publications. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Moisoglou, I., & Konstantakopoulou, O. (2024). The TikTok Addiction Scale: Development and validation. AIMS Public Health, 11(4), 1172.
11. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Moisoglou, I., & Konstantakopoulou, O. (2024). The TikTok Addiction Scale: Development and validation. AIMS Public Health, 11(4), 1172–1197. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2024061
12. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Routledge.
13. Günlü, A., Oral, T., Yoo, S., & Chung, S. (2023). Reliability and validity of the problematic TikTok Use Scale among the general population. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1068431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1068431
14. Kıran, S., Küçükbostancı, H., & Emre, İ. E. (2020). Sosyal medya kullanımının kişiler üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(4), 435-441.
15. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction—a review of the psychological literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8(9), 3528-3552.
16. Li, Y., Guan, M., Hammond, P., & Berrey, L. E. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: a content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health education research, 36(3), 261-271.
17. McCashin, D., & Murphy, C. M. (2023). Using TikTok for public and youth mental health–A systematic review and content analysis. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(1), 279-306.
18. Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in public health, 9, 641673.
19. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
20. Schou Andreassen, C., & Pallesen, S. (2014). Social network site addiction-an overview. Current pharmaceutical design, 20(25), 4053-4061. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
21. Tang, J. H., Chen, M. C., Yang, C. Y., Chung, T. Y., & Lee, Y. A. (2016). Personality traits, interpersonal relationships, online social support, and Facebook addiction. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 102–108.
22. Tanhan, F., Özok, H. İ., Kaya, A., & Yıldırım, M. (2024). Mediating and moderating effects of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between social media addiction and phubbing. Current Psychology, 43(1), 192-203.
23. Wartberg, L., Kriston, L., & Thomasius, R. (2020). Internet gaming disorder and problematic social media use in a representative sample of German adolescents: Prevalence estimates, comorbid depressive symptoms and related psychosocial aspects. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 31–36.
24. Xiong, Y., & Ji, Y. (2019). From content platform to relationship platform: analysis of the attribute change of Tiktok short video. View Publish, 4, 29-34.
25. Zhao, L. (2023). Social media addiction and its impact on college students' academic performance: The mediating role of stress. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 81-90.
26. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New media & society, 24(8), 1872-1890.