Evaluation of Green Airport Criteria in Sustainable Transportation Using DEMATEL and BWM

Öz

In line with increasing environmental concerns and sustainability objectives, evaluating airports based on green criteria has gained growing importance. This study aims to evaluate and prioritize green airport criteria using the DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) and BWM (Best-Worst Method) approaches. The main criteria, identified through a comprehensive literature review and expert consultation, include energy efficiency, carbon footprint, waste management, fuel management, transportation alternatives, next-generation aircraft, noise pollution, and sustainable materials. The study examines both the priority levels of these criteria and their causal relationships. Data collected from field experts were analyzed using the DEMATEL and BWM multi-criteria decision-making methods. The findings identify the most critical criteria for improving environmental performance and provide practical implications for sustainable airport management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Green airport
• Airport management
• Sustainable environment
• DEMATEL
• BWM

Etik Beyan

The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal's author guidelines page, have been adhered to. The experimental procedures were approved by the Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee of Istanbul Arel University, (approval date: 15 November, 2024, protocol code: 2024/22).

Teşekkür

The authors acknowledge that the language and readability of this manuscript were improved through AI-assisted grammatical revision.

Kaynakça

1. Abduh, N., Dirawan, G. D., & Asrib, A. R. (2015). Analysis of noise and air pollution on Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport (Eco-Airport). Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 31(1), 149–154.
2. Baxter, G. (2021). Mitigating an airport’s carbon footprint through the use of “green” technologies: The case of Brisbane and Melbourne airports, Australia. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 6(1), 29–39.
3. Chanda, C. R., Hakim, M. M., & Ahmed, F. (2023). Transportation infrastructure and economic growth: Empirical insights from Bangladesh. Journal of Business, 8(2), 1–15.
4. Cosgrove, C. (2018). Green initiatives for sustainable airport services. Journal of Airport Management, 12(4), 350–358.
5. Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M. & Batieha, F. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8384–8391.
6. Dalkıran, A. (2023). An investigation and benchmarking model for developing sustainable material use among Turkish airport operators. Journal of Aviation, 7(1), 93–99.
7. Deng, S., Zhou, S., Zhang, L., & Zhao, J. (2025). Study on green airport construction and aviation pollution control: A case study of four international airports. Atmosphere, 16(3), Article 261.
8. Dobruszkes, F., Grippa, T., Hanaoka, S., Loko, Y., Redondi, R., Vowles, T., & Wang, J. (2021). Multiple-airport systems: The (re) development of older airports in view of noise pollution issues. Transport Policy, 114, 298–311.

9. Duliński, W. (2025). An assessment of relation between sustainability and architectural representativeness of passenger airport terminals in Poland. Sustainability, 17(1), Article 296.
10. Eid, A., Obrecht, M., Ali, A. H., & Barakat, M. (2024). Does environmental knowledge and performance engender environmental behavior at airports? A moderated mediation effect. Business Process Management Journal, 30(3), 671–698.
11. Filho, L. W., Ng, A., Sharifi, A., Janová, J., Özuyar, P. G., Hemani, C., Heyes, G., Njau, D., & Rampasso, I.S. (2023). Global tourism, climate change and energy sustainability: Assessing carbon reduction mitigating measures from the aviation industry. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 983–996.
12. Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center.
13. Gómez Comendador, V. F., Arnaldo Valdés, R. M., & Lisker, B. (2019). A holistic approach to the environmental certification of green airports. Sustainability, 11(15), Article 4043.
14. Han, B., Kong, W. K., Yao, T. W., & Wang, Y. (2020). Air pollutant emission inventory from LTO cycles of aircraft in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei airport group, China . Environmental Science, 41(7), 3086–3094.
15. Huertas, J. I., Rincon, A. Z., Velazquez, A., Marquez, C., Diaz, J. A. & Florez, M. (2024). Energy efficiency in medium-scale airports: Two Mexican airports as case of study. Heliyon, 10(15), Article e35237.
16. Javaherikhah, A., & Sarvari, H. (2025). Implementing building information modeling to enhance smart airport facility management: An AHP-SWOT approach. CivilEng, 6(1), Article 15.
17. Jia, X., Macário, R., & Buyle, S. (2024). How do airports align with sustainability? An analysis of the world's 150 busiest airports. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 7409–7433.
18. Kaçar, B., Turhan, E., Dalkiran, A., & Karakoc, T. H. (2022). Green airport building certification comparison: A practical approach for airport management. International Journal of Green Energy, 20(6), 602–615.
19. König, P., Höschler, K. & Müller, P. (2023). Assessment of (hybrid)-electric drive-train architectures for future aircraft applications. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2526(1), Article 012023.
20. Kousoulidou, M., & Lonza, L. (2016). Biofuels in aviation: Fuel demand and CO2 emissions evolution in Europe toward 2030. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 166–181.
21. Liang, F., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Consistency issues in the Best Worst Method: Measurements and thresholds. Omega, 96, Article 102175.
22. Lv, Y., Wan, L., Zhang, N., Wang, Z., Tian, Y., & Ye, W. (2024). Research on the green transition path of airport development under the mechanism of tripartite evolutionary game model. Sustainability, 16(18), Article 8074.
23. Mi, X., Tang, M., Liao, H., Shen, W., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next? Omega, 87, 205–225.
24. Mishchenko, A., Dalkıran, A., Novakovska, I., Skrypnyk, L., & Ishchenko, N. (2022). Environmentally sustainable airport development: Ukrainian case of decarbonization. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 95(3), 488–500.
25. Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian Best-Worst Method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, Article 102120.
26. Pavlic, B., Cepak, F., Sucic, B., Peckaj, M., & Kandus, B. (2014). Sustainable port infrastructure, practical implementation of the green port concept. Thermal Science, 18(3), 935–948.
27. Rafanambinantsoa, C. V., Muraretu, I., Dimbisoa, W. G., Mahatody, T., Bãdicã, C., & Razafindrakoto, R. (2024). Modelling aircraft noise map around an airport using machine learning [Paper presentation]. 2024 International Conference on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), Craiova, Romania.
28. Raimundo, R. J., Baltazar, M. E., & Cruz, S. P. (2023). Sustainability in the airports ecosystem: A literature review. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12325.
29. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.
30. Rezaei, J., van Roekel, W. S., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of the Logistics Performance Index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transport Policy, 68, 158–169.
31. Rosario, P. (2021). Morphing wing flaps for large civil aircraft: Evolution of a smart technology across the Clean Sky Program. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 34(1), 13–28.
32. Sarbassov, Y., Venetis, C., Aiymbetov, B., Abylkhani, B., Yagofarova, A., Tokmurzin, D., Anthony, E. J. & Inglezakis, V. J. (2020). Municipal solid waste management and greenhouse gas emissions at international airports: A case study of Astana International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 85, Article 101789.
33. Sebastian, R., & Louis, J. (2021). Understanding waste management at airports: A study on current practices and challenges based on literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 147, Article 111229.
34. Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, Article 3696457.
35. Sipos, A. (2024). International aviation law: Regulations in three dimensions. Springer International Publishing.
36. Sleiman, S., & Ouf, M. (2025). A review on energy practices and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of airports. Building and Environment, 278, Article 112965.
37. Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044.
38. Uysal, M. P., & Söğüt, M. Z. (2017). An integrated research for architecture-based energy management in sustainable airports. Energy, 140, 1387–1397.
39. Whittle, J. W., Callander, K., Akure, M., Kachwala, F., & Koh, S. C. L. (2024). A new high-level life cycle assessment framework for evaluating environmental performance: An aviation case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 471, Article 143440.
40. Wu, C., Chan, T., & Redonnet, S. (2024). Environmental impact by air traffic: Assessing aircraft noise nearby Hong Kong International Airport. Applied Acoustics, 220, Article 109952.
41. Wu, H. H., & Tsai, Y. N. (2011). A DEMATEL method to evaluate the causal relations among the criteria in auto spare parts industry. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(5), 2334–2342.
42. Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835.
43. Wu, X., Zhang, L., & Yang, H. C. (2020). Integration of eco-centric views of sustainability in port planning. Journal of Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2971.