TR
EN
Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes
Öz
Concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) members have high strength, stiffness, and ductility properties, which makes them favorable in structural applications. This study purposes to create a finite element analysis-based model for designing the peak strength of axially loaded CFSTcircular columns. To this aim, 314 test specimens presented in the previous experimental studies were investigated. In the study, the wall thickness and yield strength of steel tube, compressive strength of concrete, and column diameter and length were designated as the design parameters. In this regard, the design model created using the finite element analysis proposed in this study was evaluated comparatively with existing ones given in the existing design codes and standards such as ACI, AS, AISC, AIJ, Eurocode 4, DL/T, and CISC. Besides, the estimation performance of all design models was examined statistically as well.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Tsuda, K., Matsui, C., & Ishibashi, Y. (1995). Stability design of slender concrete filled steel tubular columns. In: Proc. of the Fifth Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-5), 439-444.
- Zeghiche, J., & Chaoui, K. (2005). An experimental behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61, 53-66.
- Lu, Z.H., & Zhao, Y.G. (2010). Suggested empirical models for the axial capacity of circular CFT stub column. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66, 850-862.
- Han, L.H., Li, W., & Bjorhovde, R. (2014). Developments and advanced applications of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) structures: Members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 100, 211-228.
- Li, N., Lu, Y.Y., Li, S., & Liang, H.J. (2015). Statistical-based evaluation of design codes for circular concrete-filled steel tube columns. Steel and Composite Structure, 18, 519-546.
- Zhao, X.L., & Han, L.H. (2006). Double skin composite construction. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 8, 93-102.
- Roeder, C.W., Lehman, D.E., & Bishop, E. (2010). Strength and stiffness of circular concrete-filled tubes. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136, 1545-1553.
- Lu, Z.H., & Zhao, Y.G. (2010). Suggested empirical models for the axial capacity of circular CFT stub column. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66, 850-862.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Mühendislik
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
7 Aralık 2021
Kabul Tarihi
25 Nisan 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1
APA
Erdoğan, A., Güneyisi, E. M., & İpek, S. (2022). Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 324-339. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1033827
AMA
1.Erdoğan A, Güneyisi EM, İpek S. Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;9(1):324-339. doi:10.35193/bseufbd.1033827
Chicago
Erdoğan, Ayşegül, Esra Mete Güneyisi, ve Süleyman İpek. 2022. “Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes”. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 9 (1): 324-39. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1033827.
EndNote
Erdoğan A, Güneyisi EM, İpek S (01 Haziran 2022) Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 9 1 324–339.
IEEE
[1]A. Erdoğan, E. M. Güneyisi, ve S. İpek, “Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes”, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 9, sy 1, ss. 324–339, Haz. 2022, doi: 10.35193/bseufbd.1033827.
ISNAD
Erdoğan, Ayşegül - Güneyisi, Esra Mete - İpek, Süleyman. “Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes”. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 9/1 (01 Haziran 2022): 324-339. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1033827.
JAMA
1.Erdoğan A, Güneyisi EM, İpek S. Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;9:324–339.
MLA
Erdoğan, Ayşegül, vd. “Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes”. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 9, sy 1, Haziran 2022, ss. 324-39, doi:10.35193/bseufbd.1033827.
Vancouver
1.Ayşegül Erdoğan, Esra Mete Güneyisi, Süleyman İpek. Finite Element Modelling of Ultimate Strength of CFST Column and Its Comparison with Design Codes. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 01 Haziran 2022;9(1):324-39. doi:10.35193/bseufbd.1033827
Cited By
Parametric Study on the Behavior of Steel Tube Columns with Infilled Concrete—An Analytical Study
Sustainability
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114024