Yapılı Çevre için İklime Dayanıklı Tasarım Stratejileri: Aşırı İklim Risklerine Uyum Sağlama

Öz

İklim değişikliği, yirmi birinci yüzyılın en acil küresel sorunlarından birini oluşturmakta ve ekosistemleri, toplumları ve ekonomileri çok çeşitli ölçeklerde etkilemektedir. Aşırı hava olayları, seller, artan sıcaklıklar, uzun süreli sıcak dalgaları, buzulların erimesi, deniz seviyesinin yükselmesi, kuraklıklar, fırtınalar ve orman yangınları gibi sonuçlar hem sıklık hem de şiddet açısından artmıştır. Bu iklimle ilgili tehlikeler, doğal sistemleri önemli ölçüde bozarken, aynı zamanda insan sağlığını, altyapıyı ve ekonomik istikrarı da tehdit etmektedir. Özellikle sel, aşırı sıcak ve sıcak dalgaları, şiddetli rüzgârlar ve fırtınalar ile yangınlar, yapılı çevre için önemli riskler oluşturmakta ve yapısal hasara, malzeme bozulmasına, hizmet kesintilerine ve toplumun savunmasızlığının artmasına yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışma, kapsamlı bir literatür temelli araştırma metodolojisi benimsemekte ve yapılı çevrede iklime dirençli yaklaşımlara ilişkin mevcut akademik çalışmaları, raporları ve tasarım kılavuzlarını gözden geçirip analiz etmektedir. Bu analitik çerçeve aracılığıyla araştırma, temel risk faktörlerini belirlemektedir ayrıca iklim kaynaklı tehlikeleri hafifletmeyi amaçlayan dirençli ve uyarlanabilir tasarım stratejilerini değerlendirmektedir. Bu stratejiler, sel direnci, aşırı sıcaklık koşullarında termal performans, rüzgâr ve fırtına direnci ile yangın koruma önlemlerini ele almaktadır. Bulgular, iklime duyarlı tasarım ilkelerinin entegrasyonunun yapısal güvenliği, uzun vadeli dayanıklılığı ve çevresel sürdürülebilirliği önemli ölçüde artırdığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, bu çalışma, dayanıklılık odaklı tasarım yaklaşımlarının benimsenmesinin uyum kapasitesini artırdığını, kırılganlığı azalttığını ve daha güvenli, daha yaşanabilir ortamların oluşturulmasını desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak, araştırma, artan iklim belirsizliği karşısında dayanıklılığın artık isteğe bağlı bir unsur değil, gelecekteki kalkınma için temel bir gereklilik olduğu sonucuna varmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İklim Değişikliği
• İklim Adaptasyonu
• Sürdürülebilir Kentleşme
• Arazi Kullanımı ve Arazi Örtüsü Değişikliği
• Kentsel Dayanıklılık
• İklim Dirençli Tasarım
• Dayanıklı Tasarım

Climate-Resilient Design Strategies for the Built Environment: Adapting to Extreme Climate Risks

Öz

Climate change is widely regarded as one of the most pressing global challenges of the twenty-first century, impacting ecosystems, societies, and economies at multiple scales. Its consequences, including extreme weather events, floods, rising temperatures, prolonged heatwaves, melting glaciers, sea-level rise, droughts, storms, and wildfires, have intensified in both frequency and severity. These climate-related hazards have the potential to cause significant disruption to natural systems while simultaneously threatening human health, infrastructure, and economic stability. In particular, floods, extreme heat and heatwaves, high winds and severe storms, and fires pose substantial risks to the built environment, leading to structural damage, material degradation, service disruptions, and increased community vulnerability. This study adopts a comprehensive literature-based research methodology, reviewing and analysing existing academic studies, reports, and design guidelines concerning climate-resilient approaches in the built environment. Utilising this analytical framework, the research identifies key risk factors and evaluates resilient and adaptable design strategies with the aim of mitigating climate-induced hazards. These strategies address flood resistance, thermal performance under extreme heat, wind and storm resilience, and fire protection measures. The findings indicate that the integration of climate-responsive design strategies significantly enhances structural safety, long-term durability, and environmental sustainability. Moreover, the study demonstrates that adopting resilience-oriented design approaches improves adaptive capacity, reduces vulnerability, and supports the development of safer, more liveable environments. Ultimately, the research concludes that resilience is no longer optional but a fundamental requirement for future development in the face of increasing climate uncertainty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate Change
• Climate Adaptation
• Sustainable Urbanization
• Land Use and Land Cover Change
• Urban Resilience
• Climate-Resilient Design
• Resilient Design

Kaynakça

1. Nicol, F., Roaf, S., & Crichton, D., (2009). Adapting buildings and cities for climate change: A 21st century survival guide. (2 ed.) Architectural Press.
2. Rajasekar, U., Shankar, V., Thool, P., Dutta, M., & Bhaisare, M., (2022.) A catalogue of best practices for building flood resilience SAR) Capacity Building for Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)
3. IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H. Lee & J. Romero, Eds.). IPCC. doi.org IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland,” Jul. 2023. doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.
4. Cooper, J. A. G., & Pile, J., (2014). The adaptation-resistance spectrum: A classification of contemporary adaptation approaches to climate-related coastal change. Ocean Coast Manag, vol. 94, pp. 90–98,, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.09.006.
5. Lonsdale, K., Downing, T. E., Nicholls, R. J., Parker, D., Vafeidis, A. T., Dawson, R., & Hall, J., (2008). Plausible responses to the threat of rapid sea-level rise in the Thames Estuary, Clim Change, vol. 91, no. 1–2, pp. 145–169, doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9483-0.
6. Reeder, T., Wicks, J., L. Lovell, & O. Tarrant, (2009). Protecting London from tidal flooding: limits to engineering adaptation. in Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance, W. N. Adger, I. Lorenoni, and K. L. O’Brien, Eds., Cambridge, pp. 54–63.
7. Kadıoğlu, M., (2019). Kent Selleri: Yönetim ve Kontrol Rehberi. İstanbul: Marmara Belediyeler Birliği Kültür Yayınları.
8. Memiş, L., & Düzgün, S., (2020). İklim Değişikliği ve Kentsel Alanda Seller: Beşikdüzü Seli (2016) Örneği, Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, vol. 1, no. 45, pp. 252–279, Feb. doi: 10.17498/kdeniz.660457.

9. Kadıoğlu, Y., Bağcı, H. R., & Yılmaz, C., (2016). Doğu Karadeniz Kıyı Kuşağındaki Doğal Afetlere Bir Örnek: 21 Tarihli Beşikdüzü Seli ve Heyelanları, Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, pp. 232-242., 2017.
10. Yılmaz, C., & Kaya, M., (2018). Oluşum Sebepleri, Verdiği Zararlar ve Alınan Önlemler Bağlamında Samsun - Atakum Sel ve Taşkınları, TÜCAUM 30. Yıl Uluslararası Coğrafya Sempozyumu, Ankara.
11. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on 'Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities'. Publications Office of the European Union
12. Shacham, C., Walters, G., Janzen, C., & Maginnis, S., (2016). Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges, IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi: 10.2305/iucn.ch.2016.13.en.
13. McCallum, I., Liu, W., See, L., Mechler, R., Keating, A., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Mochizuki, J., Fritz, S., Dugar, S., Arestegui, M., Szoenyi, M., Laso Bayas, J. C., Burek, P., French, A., & Moorthy, I., (2016). Technologies to support community flood disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,7(2),198-204.
14. Munawar, H. S. (2020). Flood disaster management: Risks, technologies, and future directions. Machine vision inspection systems: image processing, concepts, methodologies and applications, 1, 115-146.
15. Hussain, F., Hussain, R., Wu, R. S., & Abbas, T. (2019). Rainwater harvesting potential and utilization for artificial recharge of groundwater using recharge wells. Processes, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090623
16. Vijayaraghavan, K., Biswal, B. K., Adam, M. G., Soh, S. H., Tsen-Tieng, D. L., Davis, A. P., Chew, S. H., Tan, P., Y., Babovic, V., & Balasubramanian, R. (2021). Bioretention systems for stormwater management: Recent advances and future prospects. In Journal of Environmental Management (Vol. 292). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112766
17. Ke, X., Yang, W., Misheng, L., & Ranting, Z. (2023). Urban and architectural design from the perspective of flood resilience: Framework development and case study of a Chinese university campus. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(5), 3100-3114.
18. Şen, E., & Şat, B. (2024). Bioswales as engineering functions of nature-based solutions to increase urban resilience: A review. Forestist, 74(2), 253-258.
19. Freni, G., & Liuzzo, L. (2019). Effectiveness of rainwater harvesting systems for flood reduction in residential urban areas. Water (Switzerland), 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071389
20. Olbert, A. I., Moradian, S., Nash, S., Comer, J., Kazmierczak, B., Falconer, R. A., & Hartnett, M. (2023). Combined statistical and hydrodynamic modelling of compound flooding in coastal areas-Methodology and application. Journal of Hydrology, 620, 129383.
21. Baykal, A. (2012). 2012 Yılı Şiddetli Yağış Yönetim Planı. Kopenhag Şehri Teknik ve Çevre İdaresi, Kopenhag 1-28.
22. Esang, M. O. (2026). Developing Community-Based Early Warning Systems for Flood Disaster Management Using Mobile Technology. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 13(2).
23. Baldwin, J. W., Dessy, J. B., Vecchi, G. A., & Oppenheimer, (2019). M. Temporally Compound Heat Wave Events and Global Warming: An Emerging Hazard. Earths Future, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 411–427, doi: 10.1029/2018EF000989.
24. Alam, M., Sanjayan, J., & Zou, P. X. W., (2019). Balancing Energy Efficiency and Heat Wave Resilience in Building Design, Climate Adaptation Engineering: Risks and Economics for Infrastructure Decision-Making, pp. 329–349. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816782-3.00011-5.
25. Ahmadalipour A., & Moradkhani, H., (2018). Escalating heat-stress mortality risk due to global warming in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), Environ Int, vol. 117, pp. 215–225. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2018.05.014.
26. Attia, S., Pathirana, S., Alkhalidi, A., & Zhang, S. (2021). Resilient cooling of buildings to protect against heat waves and power outages: Key concepts and definition. Energy and Buildings, 239. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110869.
27. Aivalioti, S., (2015). Electricity Sector Adaptation to Heat Waves, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School. doi: 10.1093/WW/9780199540884.013.U16539.
28. Kesik, T., O’Brien, L., & Ozkan, A. (2019). Thermal resilience design guide.
29. Baniassadi, A., & Sailor, D. J. (2018). Synergies and trade-offs between energy efficiency and resiliency to extreme heat – A case study. Building and Environment, 132, 263–272. doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2018.01.037.
30. Birge, D. P., Brearley, J., Zhang, Z., & Norford, L. K. (2025). Design of heat-resilient housing in hot-arid regions. Energy and Buildings, 328, 115003. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115003.
31. Gupta, R., Barnfield, L., & Gregg, M. (2017). Overheating in care settings: Magnitude, causes, preparedness and remedies. Building Research & Information, 45(1-2), 83–101. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1227923.
32. Kjellstrom, T., Holmer, I., & Lemke, B. (2009). Workplace heat stress, health and productivity – an increasing challenge for low and middle-income countries during climate change. Global Health Action, 2(1), 2047. doi: 10.3402/GHA.V2I0.2047.
33. Clarke, D., & Reardon, C. (2015). Design for a changing climate: Heatwaves. ReNew: Technology for a Sustainable Future, (130), 58–62. doi: 10.2307/renetechsustfutu.130.58.
34. Pastori, S., & Sergio, M. E. (2023). Climate change and extreme wind events: Overview and perspectives for a resilient built environment. In Urban Transition: Perspectives on Urban Systems and Environments. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com
35. Agarwal, F., Chakraborty, I., & Banerjee, S. (2024). Impact of forest fire on climate change. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM), 6(1), 391–398. doi: 10.35629/5252- 0601391398.
36. Henderson, D., Smith, D. B., Boughton, G. J., & Ginger, J. (2018). Damage and loss to buildings during recent cyclones. In Australian Structural Engineering Conference: ASEC 2018 (pp. 83–88). Engineers Australia. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.964267653152909
37. Wills, J. A. B., Lee, B. E., & Wyatt, T. A. (2002). A model of wind-borne debris damage. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90(4–5), 555–565. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00197-0.
38. Mejorin, A., Trabucco, D., & Stelzer, I. (2019). Cyclone-resistant façades: Best practices in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, and the Philippines. Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH).
39. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FullReport.pdf
40. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı İdari İşler Başkanlığı. (2007). Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi (Karar No: 2007/12937) . https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=200712937&MevzuatTur=21&MevzuatTertip=5
41. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2008). Home builder’s guide to construction in wildfire zones (FEMA P-737). U.S. Department of Homeland Security
42. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2025). Home builder’s guide to construction in wildfire zones. U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
43. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
44. Park, K., & Choi, S. H. (2025). Analysis of urban flood risk for the implementation of sustainable land use measures. Climate Services, 38, 100568. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser. 2025.100568
45. Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM). (2021). Selecting measures and designing strategies for integrated flood management: A guidance tool. World Meteorological Organization & Global Water Partnership. https://www.floodmanagement.info/floodmanagement/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/APFM- Guidance-Selecting-Measures-and-Design-Strategies-for-IFM.pdf
46. World Health Organization & World Meteorological Organization. (2015). Heatwaves and health: Guidance on warning-system development (WMO-No. 1142). WHO; WMO. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default- source/climate-change/heat-waves-and-health---guidance-on-warning-system- development.pdf?sfvrsn=e4813084_2&download=true.
47. Santamouris, M. (2014). Cooling the cities—A review of reflective and green roof mitigation technologies to fight heat island and improve comfort in urban environments. Solar Energy, 103, 682–703. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.07.003
48. Holmes, J. D. (2015). Wind loading of structures. CRC Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1201/b18029
49. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2020). Guidelines for wind vulnerability assessments of existing critical facilities (FEMA P-2062). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/guidelines-wind-vulnerability.pdf.
50. Calkin, D. E., Cohen, J. D., Finney, M. A., & Thompson, M. P. (2014). How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 746–751., 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315088111.
51. Syphard, A. D., Brennan, T. J., & Keeley, J. E. (2014). The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 23(8), 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13158