Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 29 - 48, 28.06.2019

Oğuz Arslan Aslı Ergenekon Arslan Merve Şentürk Acar

https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.561668

Cited By: 4

Öz

In this study, taking the different parameters into
account, different designs of b-type ORC
power plant have analytically conducted. In the designs, Simav geothermal
resources have been taken into consideration as the source of the plant. Then,
the best design has been determined using EATWOS in the viewpoint of the
working conditions. As a conclusion, the available models of b1-type, b2-type and b3-type were
determined as Model 12, Model 10 and Model 31, respectively for energy
efficiency, net yearly electricity generation and integrated-based values. Amongst these,
the best model was determined as Model 10 with the design parameters
of 353.15 K, 413.15 K, 295.15 K, 656.37 MWh and 18.08 for T_1b, T_2d, T_2c, E_net and η, respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

EATWOS, Geothermal Energy, B-Type ORC

Kaynakça

• [1] Atici K.B., Ulucan, A. (2009). Enerji Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Sürecinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye Uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı 1, 161-186 (in Turkish).
• [2] Yıldırım, B.F., Önder, E. (2015). İşletmeciler, Mühendisler ve Yöneticiler için Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri. Dora Yayınevi, 2. Baskı, Bursa (in Turkish).
• [3] Arslan, A. E., Güven, Ö.Z., (2018). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Üniversite Etkinliklerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Çalışma: Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(6), 86-105.
• [4] Arslan, A. E., Acar, M. S., Arslan O., (2018). Data Envelopıng Based Effectiveness Analysis of Integrated Geothermal System: Simav Case Study. International Congress on Afro - Eurasian Research IV, 27-29 April 2018.
• [5] Huang, W., Eling, M., (2013). An efficiency comparison of the non-life insurance industry in the BRIC countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 577-591.
• [6] Kundakcı, N., (2018). Effıciency Evaluation of State Universities in Turkey wıth EATWOS Method. International Congress on Afro - Eurasian Research IV, 27-29 April 2018.
• [7] Özbek, A., (2015). Efficiency Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Based in Turkey. International Business Research, 8(9), 1-11.
• [8] Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L. (2006). Decision Analysis in Energy and Environmental Modeling: an Update. Energy, 31, 2604–2622.
• [9] Peters, M. L., Zelewski, S. (2006). Efficiency analysis under consideration of satisficing levels for output quantities. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), April 28-May 01, Boston, USA.
• [10] Özbek, Aşır, (2016), Madencilik Sektöründe Yer Alan Şirketlerin Eatwos İle Karşılaştırılması. Uluslararası Katılımlı 16. Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 12-14 Ekim 2016, İstanbul.
• [11] Özbek, A., (2017). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Hayırsever Kuruluşlarında Verimlilik Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, No: 2, 99-114.
• [12] Soni, V., Singh, S. P., Devinder K. B., (2016). Precise decisions in Indian energy sector by imprecise evaluation. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Volume 10, Issue 1.
• [13] Bansal, A. K., Singh, R., Issar, S., Varkey, J., (2014). Evaluation of Vendors Ranking By EATWOS Approach. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(3), 290-311.
• [14] Peters, M. L., Zelewski. S., (2016). Benefits and Risks of Satisficing Levels for Input and Output Quantities in Efficiency Analyses from A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Vol. 5, No. 12, 94-101.
• [15] Peters, M. L., Zelewski S., (2018). Some Thoughts on Operationalizing The Concept of Sufficiency in Efficiency Analysis. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Vol. 7, No. 1, 63-71.
• [16] Arslan, O., (2008). Simav-Eynal Jeotermal Kaynaklarının Hassas Değerlendirilmesi: Entegre sistem tasarım ve enerji-ekserji analzileri. Eskisehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi. Doktora Tezi.
• [17] Arslan, O., Yetik, O., (2014). ANN modeling of an ORC-binary geothermal power plant: simav case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 36 (4), 418-428.
• [18] Arslan, O., Ozgur, M.A., Kose, R., (2012). Electricity generation ability of the Simav geothermal field: A technoeconomic approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 34 (12), 1130-1144.