CAD Problem in Turkish Economy: An Application with Selected Macroeconomic Variables

Öz

Türkiye Ekonomisinde Cari Açık Problemi: Seçili Makroekonomik Değişkenlerle Bir Uygulama

Öz

The main goal of the countries that want to increase the prosperity of their citizens is economic growth. As a result of worldwide economic and prosperity growth, consumption and energy usage increased significantly. Insufficiency of the local resources lead the countries to international trade. Growth of international trade and increase of financial transactions made the current account deficit (CAD) problem very important for the countries. Therefore, countries develop policies in order to understand the causes of the CAD and resolve them. Some of the factors that cause the CAD are excessive appreciation of the country’s currency, fast economic growth and increase in the imported oil prices. Increase of the CAD as a share of GDP lead economies to currency and/or financial crises by increasing their fragility. Thus, CAD preserves its actuality and significance as a problem for economies. In the last decades, the CAD issue became one of the chronical problems of Turkish economy. In this context, it is seen that Turkish economy adopted the growth with CAD strategy in last 20 years and always have CAD in this period except 1998 and 2001. In this study, the causality relation and long-term relationship of Turkey's current account balance (CAB), GDP, brent type oil prices, and real exchange rate are determined by using data of 2000: Q1-2016: Q2. According to results, there is a bidirectional causality between CAD and GDP and one-way causality from oil prices to both GDP and CAD. In addition to causality relation, according the cointegration analysis, oil prices and GDP increase the CAD in the long run.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Current Account Deficit,Current Account Balance,Economic Growth,oil prices

Kaynakça

1. Alam, N., & Taib, F. M. (2013). An Investigation of The Relationship of External Public Debt with Budget Deficit, Current Account Deficit, And Exchange Rate Depreciation In Debt Trap And Non-Debt Trap Countries. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(22), 144-158.
2. Banday U. J. & Aneja R. (2015). The Link Between Budget Deficit and CAD in Indian Economy. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 4(1&2). 1-10.
3. Bayar Y., Kılıç C. & Arıca F. (2014). Türkiye’de Cari Açığın Belirleyicileri. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 451-471.
4. Bouznit, M., & Pablo-Romero, M. D. P. (2016). CO2 emission and economic growth in Algeria. Energy Policy, 96, 93-104.
5. Das, D. K. (2016). Determinants of current account imbalance in the global economy: a dynamic panel analysis. Journal of Economic Structures, 5(1), 8.
6. Demir, M. (2013). Enerji İthalatı Cari Açık İlişkisi, Var analizi ile Türkiye üzerine bir inceleme. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 5(9).
7. Dornbusch, R. (2001). A primer on emerging market crises (No. w8326). National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. Eğilmez, A. M., & Kumcu, E. (2015). Ekonomi Politikası, Teori ve Türkiye Uygulaması. Remzi Kitabevi.

9. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
10. Erdoğan, S., & Bozkurt, H. (2009). Türkiye’de cari açığın belirleyicileri: MGARCH modelleri ile bir inceleme. Maliye Finans Yazıları, 1(84), 135-172.
11. Herrmann, S., & Jochem, A. (2005). Determinants of Current Account Developments in the Central and East European EU Member States - Consequences for the Enlargement of the Euro Area (2005). Bundesbank Series 1 Discussion Paper No. 2005,32. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2785215
12. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1551-1580.
13. MD (T.R. Ministry of Development). (2013). Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018). Grand National Assembly of Turkey.
14. Kostakoğlu, S. F., & Dibo, M. (2011, June). Türkiye’de Cari Açık ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin VAR Yöntemi ile Analizi. Paper presented at EconAnadolu 2011: Anadolu International Conference in Economics II, Eskisehir, Turkey
15. Krugman P. & Wells, R. (2011). Makro İktisat (Oğuz, F., Arslan, M. M., Akkemik, K. A. & Göksal, K., Trans.) Ankara, Palme Yayıncılık.
16. Özçalık, M. & Tezsürücü, D. (2012). Enerjide Bağımlılıktan Yeşil Girişimciliğe: Türkiye Ekonomisinde Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Kullanımı. 4. Uluslararası Girişimcilik Kongresi, 2-4 Mayıs, Manisa/Türkiye.
17. Öztürk, N. (2011). Para Banka Kredi. Bursa, Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
18. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
19. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
20. Subaşat, T. (2010). Türkiye’nin cari açık sorunu: nedenler ve çözümler. İktisat ve Toplum, 1, 26-34.
21. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
22. Türkay, H., & Demirbaş, M. (2012). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Yatırımların Faiz ve Gelir İlişkisinin ARDL Yaklaşımı İle Analizi. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 3(2).
23. Türkay, H. (2013). Türkiye’de cari açık, bütçe açığı ve yatırım-tasarruf açığı ilişkisi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 253-269.
24. Üzümcü, A., & Başar, S. (2011). Türkiye’nin Cari İşlemler Bilançosu Açığı Üzerinde Enerji İthalatı ve İktisadi Büyümenin Etkisi: 2003–2010 Dönemi Üzerine Bir Analiz. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 48(558), 5-22.
25. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of business & economic statistics, 20(1), 25-44.