Gebelerin Doğum Planı ve Bu Planı Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2024, , 181 - 188, 15.09.2024

Resmiye Özdilek , Buse Nur Kısa

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.1477165

Öz

Bu çalışma, gebelerin kendilerinin oluşturduğu doğum planı ve bu planı etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla tanımlayıcı tipte gerçekleştirildi. Çalışmanın evrenini, Aralık 2022-Mart 2023 tarihleri arasında İstanbul’da bulunan Özel Hastanenin A ve B Şubeleri Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğine doğum için başvuran 206 gebe oluşturdu. Veri toplamada tanıtıcı bilgi formu ve gebelerin doğum planını etkileyen faktörler anket formu ve doğum planı formu kullanıldı. Araştırmaya katılan gebelerin yarısının normal doğum yapmayı planladığı, doğum şeklini belirlemede yaklaşık yarısının hekim önerisinden etkilendiği saptandı. Doğum planında gebelerin yarısı ebe seçerken güvenilir olmasına dikkat ettiğini bildirdi. Gebelerin yarısından fazlasının doğumu kolaylaştırıcı ilaç dışı yöntemleri bildiği belirlendi. Gebeler, kendi doğumlarında sırasıyla mahremiyetine önem verilen (%78,2), loş (%71,4), sakin (%55,8) bir ortam istediğini belirtti. Doğum sırasında gebelerin yanlarında olmasını tercih ettikleri kişiler sırasıyla eş (%85,9), Ebe (%42,7), anne (%18,9) olarak belirlendi. Gebelerin doğum planında %78,6’sı doğumdan hemen sonra yenidoğan ile ten tene temas uygulanmasını bildirdi. Doğum planlarında gebelerin %26,7’si doğumundan sonra plasentasını almak istediğini bildirdi. Sonuç olarak araştırma bulgularına göre kadınların, kendi doğumlarında deneyimli hekim ve güvenilir ebelerin yer almasını, mahremiyetin sağlandığı bir ortamda, ilaç dışı doğumu kolaylaştırıcı yöntemlerin kullanıldığı doğum planladıkları söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Doğum planı, Doğum, Doğum deneyimi, Gebelik

Determining the Birth Plan of Pregnants and the Factors Affecting This Plan

Öz

This study was carried out as a descriptive study to determine the birth plan created by pregnant women themselves and the factors affecting this plan. The population of the study consisted of 206 pregnant women who applied for birth to the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic of A and B department of the Private Hospital in Istanbul between December 2022 and March 2023. An introductory information form, a survey form on the factors affecting the birth plan of pregnant women, and a birth plan form were used to collect data. It was determined that half of the pregnant women participating in the study planned to have a normal birth, and approximately half of them were influenced by the doctor's recommendation in determining the method of birth. Half of the pregnant women reported that they paid attention to the reliability of the midwife when choosing a birth plan. It was determined that more than half of the pregnant women knew non-drug methods to facilitate birth. Pregnant women stated that they wanted an environment where their privacy was important (78.2%), dimly light (71.4%) and calm (55.8%) during their birth. The people preferred by pregnant women to be with them during birth were determined as spouses (85.9%), midwives (42.7%) and mothers (18.9%). In the birth plan of pregnant women, 78.6% reported skin-to-skin contact with the newborn immediately after birth. In their birth plans, 26.7% of pregnant women stated that they wanted to receive their placenta after birth. As a result, according to the research findings, it can be said that women plan to have experienced physicians and reliable midwives involved in their births, in an environment where privacy is ensured, and where non-drug birth-facilitating methods are used.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Birth plan, Birth, Birth experience, Pregnancy

Kaynakça

• ACOG. 2019. Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Vol. 133, Washington, US.
• Afshar Y, Wang E, Mei J, Esakoff T, Pisarska M, Gregory K. 2017. Childbirth education class and birth plans are associated with a vaginal delivery. Birth, 44(1): 29-34.
• Ahmadpour P, Moosavi S, Alizadeh-Charandabi M, Jahanfar S, Mirghafourvand M. 2022. Effect of ımplementing a birth plan on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Preg Childbirth, 22(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05199-5
• Avcıbay B, Alan S. 2011. Doğum ağrısı kontrolünde nonfarmakolojik yöntemler. Mersin Üniv Sağlık Bil Derg, 4(3): 18-24.
• Ayers S, Pickering A. 2005. Women’s expectations and experience of birth. Psychol Health, 20(1): 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044042000272912
• Bailey JM, Crane P, Nugent CE. 2008. Childbirth education and birth plans. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Amer, 35(3): 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2008.04.005
• Barnes C, Mignacca E, Mabbott K, Officer K, Hauck Y, Bradfield Z. 2023. Using a scheduled caesarean birth plan: a cross-sectional exploration of women’s perspectives. Women Birth, 36(3): 264-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.09.001
• Bell CH, Muggleton S, Davis D. 2022. Birth plans: A systematic, ıntegrative review into their purpose, process, and impact. Midwifery, 111: 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103388
• Bukian Y, Dewi PD. 2019. Placenta ceremony for social culture. Vidyattama Sanatana, 3(1): 124-128.
• Burns E. 2014. More than clinical waste? Placenta rituals among Australian home-birthing women. J Perinatal Educ, 23(1): 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.41
• Dahlberg U, Persen J, Skogås AK, Selboe ST, Torvik HM, Aune I. 2016. How can midwives promote a normal birth and a positive birth experience? The experience of first-time Norwegian mothers. Sexual Reprod Healthcare, 7: 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2015.08.001
• Djanogly T, Nicholls J, Whitten M, Lanceley A. 2022. Choice in episiotomy - fact or fantasy: A qualitative study of women’s experiences of the consent process. BMC Preg Childbirth, 22(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04475-8
• Ghahremani T, Bailey K, Whittington J, Phillips AM, Spracher BN, Thomas S, Magann EF. 2023. Birth plans: Definitions, content, effects, and best practices. Amer J Obstet Gynecol, 228(5): 977-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.011
• Gözükara F, Eroğlu K. 2008. İlk doğumunu yapmış kadınların (Primipar) doğum şekline yönelik tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe Üniv Hemş Fak Derg, 15(1): 32-46.
• He S, Jiang H, Xu Q, Garner P. 2020. Women’s experience of episiotomy: A qualitative study from China. BMJ Open, 10(7): e033354. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033354
• Heim M, Makuch M. 2022. Pregnant women’s knowledge of non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during childbirth. Eur J Midwifery, 6(February): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/145235
• İldan Calim S, Demirci H, Cambaz Ulas S. 2021. Gebelerin doğumda ebelerden beklentileri. Haliç Üniv Sağlık Bil Derg, 4(1): 49-57. https://doi.org/10.48124/husagbilder.842595
• Jenkinson B, Josey N, Kruske S. 2014. BirthSpace: An evidence-based guide to birth environment design. Queensland Centre Mothers & Babies, February: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3962.8964
• Johnson SK, Pastuschek J, Rödel J, Markert UR, Groten T. 2018. Placenta - worth trying? Human maternal placentophagy: Possible benefit and potential risks. Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde, 78(9): 846-852. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0674-6275
• Kaufman T. 2007. Evolution of the birth plan. J Perinatal Educ, 16(3): 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812407x217985
• Leap N, Sandall J, Buckland S, Huber U. 2010. Journey to confidence: Women’s experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care. J Midwifery Women’s Health, 55(3): 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.02.001
• Lothian JA. 2005. Do not disturb: The Importance of privacy in labor. J Perinatal Educ, 13(3): 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812404x1707
• Lothian JA. 2019. Healthy birth practice #4: Avoid ınterventions unless they are medically necessary. J Perinatal Educ, 28(2): 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.28.2.94
• Matabane SE, Musie ME, Mulaudzi MF. 2023. Childbirth preparation: Knowledge of the use of non-pharmacological pain relief methods during childbirth in Tshwane district, South Africa: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Rep, 14(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14010001
• Mei JY, Afshar Y, Gregory KD, Kilpatrick SJ, Esakoff TF. 2016. Birth plans: What matters for birth experience satisfaction. Birth, 43(2): 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12226
• Merten V. 2016. Your birth plan. Vol. 4. First Edit. Pregnancy Podcast, California, San Diego, US.
• Mete S, Güler B, Aypar Akbağ N. 2021. Vajinal doğum yapan annelerin ten tene temas ile ilgili bilgi, uygulama ve engelleri. Hacettepe Üniv Hemş Fak Derg, 8(1): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.906905
• Moeti C, Mulaudzi FM, Rasweswe MM. 2023. The disposal of placenta among indigenous groups globally: An integrative literature review. Int J Reprod Medic, 2023: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6676809
• Odent M. 2001. New reasons and new ways to study birth physiology. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 75(SUPPL. 1): 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00512-4
• Oe F, Akpor O, Ri F, Ag A. 2021. Postpartum placental rituals: Perceptions of midwives and mothers in selected healthcare centers, Southwestern Nigeria. Annals Romanian Soc Cell Biol, 25(4): 4681-4691.
• Pekince DG, Ertem G. 2016. Doğum öncesi bakım. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 127-168.
• Pietrzak J, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska W, Wróbel A, Grzybowska MA. 2023. Women’s knowledge about pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of pain relief in labor. Healthcare, 11(13): 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131882
• Rocca-Ihenacho L, Batinelli L, Thaels E, Rayment J, Newburn M, McCourt C. 2018. Midwifery Unit Standards. London, UK.
• Stenglin M, Foureur F. 2013. Designing out the fear cascade to increase the likelihood of normal birth. Midwifery, 29(8): 819-825.
• T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. 2018. Gebe bilgilendirme sınıfı, gebe okulu ve doğuma hazırlık ve danışmanlık merkezlerinin çalışma usül ve esasları. Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 20.
• Timur S, Hotun Şahin N. 2010. Women’s social support preferences and experiences during labor. Hemar, 2010: 29-40.
• TNSA. 2018. Türkiye nüfus ve sağlık araştırması. Ankara, Türkiye.
• Tokat Çınaroğlu S, Demirgöz Bal M. 2022. Effects of spouse and mother/friend support on birth process: descriptive cross-sectional study. Turkiye Klin J Health Sci, 7(3): 780-785. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2021-86701
• Turgut N, Güldür A, Çakmakçı H, Şerbetçi G, Yıldırım F, Ender Yumru A, Bebek A, Gülova SS. 2017. A study about knowledge level of pregnants that educated in pregnancy school. J Acad Res Nurs, 3(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5222/jaren.2017.001
• Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Rådestad I. 2004. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth, 31(1): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0270.x
• Whitford HM, Hillan EM. 1998. Women’s perceptions of birth plans. Midwifery, 14(4): 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90097-3
• WHO. 2018. Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience.
• Yerlikaya A, İldan Calim S. 2021. Erken ten tene temasın anne ve yenidoğan sağlığına etkisi. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci, 24(1): 117-130. https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.631562