Four-Layered Closure of Large Oroantral Fistula: A Case Report

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 40 - 44, 01.05.2019

Elshan Muradov , Mehmet Barış Şimşek Mert Gündoğdu

Öz

 Oroantral communication is the consequence of a loss of continuity between the maxillary sinus and the oral cavity. Sinus floor perforation occurs due to the close anatomical relationship between this structure and the antral teeth and to procedures such as extraction of posterior teeth, trauma, orthognatic surgery, osteomyelitis, gummatous lesions, periapical surgery, cyst and neoplasm removal, the placement of implants in the posterior segment of the maxilla and an improper surgical approach, as well as brusqueness in the use of instruments. Extraction of maxillary posterior teeth is the most common aetiology. We present a case of  45 year old male with oroantral fistula(OAF) which was caused by left maxillary second molar extraction.The defect was closure by four-layered technique, which combined collagen membrane, pedical palatal connective tissue, pedical buccal fat pad flap and buccal advancement flap.After 6 months follow up complete epithelization of operation site was observed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Oroantral fistula, Sinus membrane, Buccal fat pad, Buccal advancement flap, Palatal rotated connective tissue, Collagen membrane

GENİŞ OROANTRAL FİSTÜLÜN DÖRT KATMANLI DOKUYLA KAPATILMASI: VAKA RAPORU

Öz

  Oroantral ilişki  maksiller sinüs ve ağız boşluğu arasında bulunan açıklıktır. Sinüs tabanı perforasyonu posterior dişlerin çekilmesi, travma, ortognatik cerrahi, osteomiyelit, gummatöz lezyonlar, periapikal cerrahi, kist ve neoplazm çıkarılması, implantların yerleştirilmesi ve alet kullanımında olan keskinlik gibi  prosedürlere bağlı olarak ortaya çıkar. Maksilla posterior dişlerin çekilmesi oroantral fistül oluşumunun en sık görülen etiyolojisidir. Bu makalede 45 yaşında erkek hastanın sol maksilla  ikinci molar dişin çekiminden sonra oluşan  oroantral fistül (OAF) vakası sunulacaktır.  Defekt, kolajen membran, rotasyonal palatal bağ dokusu, bukkal yağ ve bukkal ilerletme flebi ile  kombine edilen dört katmanlı teknikle kapatılmıştır. 6 ay sonra operasyon sahasının tam epitelizasyonu gözlenilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Oroantral fistül, Sinüs membranı, Bukkal yağ fleb, Bukkal ilerletme flebi, Palatal bağ dokusu, Kollajen membran

Kaynakça

• Abuabara A, Cortez A, Passeri L, De Moraes M, Moreira R. 2006. Evaluatiion of different treatments for oroantral /oronasal communication: Experience of 112 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35: 155-158.
• Adeyemo W, Ogunlewe M, Ladeinde A, James O. 2004. Closure of oro-antral fistula with pedicled buccal fat pad. A case report and review of literature. Afr J Oral Health, 1: 42-46.
• Awang MN. 1988. Closure of oroantral fistula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 17: 110-115.
• Batra H, Jindal G, Kaur S. 2010. Evaluation of different treatment modalities for closure of oro-antral communication and formulation of a rational approach. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 9: 13-18.
• Borle RN. 2014. Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1st Ed. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
• Chao CK, Chang LC, Liu SY, Wang JJ. 2002. Histologic examination of pedicled buccal fat pad graft in oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60: 1131-1134.
• Egyedi P. 1977. Utilization of the buccal fat pad for closure of oroantral and/or oro-nasal communication. J Maxillofac Surg, 5: 241-244.
• Guhan D, Gokhan G, Bahar G. 2007. Modified connective tissue flap: A new approach to closure of an oroantral fistula. Case Report Study. British J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45: 251–252.
• Haanaes HR, Gilhuus-Moe O. 1972. Experimental oro-paranasal communications. Acta Odontologica, 30: 151-165.
• Hanazawa Y, Itoh K, Mabashi T, Sato K. 1995. Closure of oroantral communication using a pedicled buccal fat pad graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 53: 771-775.
• Killey H, Kay L. 1972. Observation based on the surgical closure of 362 oro-antral fistulas. Int Surg, 57: 545-549.
• Malik NA. 2012. Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 3rd Ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
• Proctor B. 1969. Bone graft closure of large or persistent oromaxillary fistula. Laryngoscope, 79: 822-826.
• Rapidis AD, Alexandridis CA, Elefheriadis E, Angeloppoulos AP. 2000. The use of buccal fat pad for reconstruction of oral oral defects: review of the literature and report of 15 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58: 158-163.
• Rehrmann A. 1936. Eine methode zur schliessung von kieferhöhperforationen. Dtsch Zahnarzt Wschr, 39: 1136.
• Samman B, Cheung l, Tideman H. 1993. The buccal fat pad in oral reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 22: 2-6.
• Simion M, Trisi P, Maglione M, Piatelli A. 1995. Bacterial penetration in vitro through GTAM membrane with and without topical chlorhexidine application. A light and scaning electron microscopic study. J Clin Periodontol, 22(4): 321-331.
• Singh J, Prasad K, Lalitha RM, Ranganath R. 2010. Buccal pad of fat and its application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of published literature (February) 2004 to (July) 2009. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 110: 698-705.
• Thoma K, Pajarola FG, Gratz WK, Schmidlin RP. 2006. Bioabsorbable root analogue for closure of oroantral communication after tooth extraction: Aprospective casecohort study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod, 101: 558-564.
• Waldrop TC, Semba SE. 1993. Closure of oroantral communication using guided tissue regeneration and an absorbable gelatin membrane. J Periodontal, 64(11): 1061- 1066.
• Yalçın S, Öncü B, Emes Y, Atalay B, Aktaş İ. 2011. Surgical treatment of oroantral fistulas: a clinical study of 23 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69: 333-369.