A macroanatomic, morphometric and comparative investigation on skeletal system of the geese growing in Kars region II; Skeleton appendiculare

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 6 - 16, 01.01.2021

Gülseren Kırbaş Doğan İsmet Takcı

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.800479

Cited By: 1

Öz

The aim of this study was to comparatively, morphometrically and macroanatomically investigate skeleton appendiculare. A
total of 24 goose cadavers were used. Scapula length was 107.31 ± 1.05 mm in female geese; it was 116.63 ± 0.65 mm in male geese.
While the length of the os coracoideum was 78.5 ± 0.6 mm in female geese; it was detected as 87 ± 0.8 mm in male geese. The clavicula
length was 66.90 ± 0.71 mm in female geese and it was 73.39 ± 0.59 mm in male geese and it was determined that both clavicula
shaped furcula with a distinct curvature. While the length of the humerus in female geese was 175.02 ± 1.59 mm; it was measured as
191.28 ± 1.44 mm in male ones. While the mean ulna height was 162.60 ± 1.26 mm in female geese; it was determined as 178.84 ± 0.83
mm in male geese. The mean radius length was measured as 154.20 ± 1.63 mm in female geese, it was 169.75 ± 1.31 mm in male geese.
It was detected that os carpi radiale was in a triangular shape, os carpi ulnare was in the form of a pipe. It was determined that the
height of carpometacarpus was 94.57 ± 0.75 mm in female geese; 100.95 ± 1.03 mm was in male geese. Pelvis length was measured as
154.27 ± 1.81 mm in female geese; it was 169.91 ± 1.68 mm in male geese. While femur length was detected as 86.85 ± 0.98 mm in
female geese; it was 93.87 ± 1.12 mm in male geese. While tibiotarsus length was 160.94 ± 1.88 mm in female geese; it was 174.20 ±
1.28 mm in male ones. While the tarsometatarsus length was 93.15 ± 1.19 mm in female geese; it was measured as 101.64 ± 0.88 mm
in male geese. As a result, in this study, thought that obtained findings will contribute in scientific research, evaluations of sexual
dimorphism, zooarchaeological studies and operations on poultry animals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anatomy, Goose, Kars, Poultry, Skeleton appendiculare

Kaynakça

• Allison R, Tumarkin-Deratzian, David RV, Peter D. 2006. Bone surface texture as an ontogenetic indicator in long bones of the Canada goose Branta canadensis (Anseriformes: Anatidae). Zool J Linnean Soc, 148: 133-168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00232.x.
• Aslan C. 2013. Kaz besleme ve yetiştiriciliği, Genişletilmiş 2. baskı, Medipres Matbaacılık Yayıncılık Lt. Şti, Malatya, Turkey.
• Atalar Ö, Kürtül İ, Özdemir D. 2007. Morphological and morphometric approach to the bones of the wings in the Long-Legged Buzzard (Buteo Rufinus). FÜ Sağ Bil Derg, 21: 163-166.
• Başoğul M, Beşoluk K. 2016. Kaya kekliği (Alectoris graeca) ve sülünlerde (Phasianus colchicus) bacak kemikleri (Ossa membri pelvini) üzerinde karşılaştırmalı makro anatomik araştırmalar. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 1: 13-22.
• Charuta A, Bartyzel BJ, Karbowicz M, Kobryń H. 2005. Morphology and morphometry of the antebrachial skeleton and bones of hand of the domestic Pekin duck. Vet Med Zoot, 51: 26-30.
• Çevik Demirkan A, Kürtül İ, Hazıroğlu RM. 2006. Gross morphological features of the lung and air sac in the Japanese quail. J Vet Med Sci, 68: 909-913.
• Çevik Demirkan A. 2002. Ördekte iskelet sistemi. AÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, PhD. Thesis, Ankara.
• Demirsoy A. 1995. Yaşamın temel kuralları. omurgalılar/amniyota (sürüngenler, kuşlar ve memeliler). Vol. 3, Bölüm 2, Meteksan Yayınevi, Ankara, Turkey.
• Dursun N. 2007. Evcil kuşların anatomisi. Medisan yayınevi, 11. Baskı, Ankara, Turkey.
• Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. 1987. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. Philadelphia, USA.
• Gültekin M.1966. Evcil memeli ve kanatlıların karşılaştırmalı osteologia’sı. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, Turkey.
• Gültekin M.1957. Yerli tavuk ve horoz iskeleti ile yerli hindi iskeleti arasındaki sabit makro-anatomik ayrımlar üzerinde incelemeler. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 4: 6-14.
• Hogg DA. 1984a. The development of pneumatisation in the postcranial skeleton of the domestic fowl. J Anat, 139: 105-113.
• Hogg DA. 1984b. The distribution of pneumatisation in the skeleton of the adult domestic fowl. J Anat, 138: 617-629.
• Kılıç E, Yayla S, Ermutlu CŞ, Aydın U. 2018. Köpek yavrularında diafizer femur kırığının sağaltımı için kaz radius’u kullanımı. V. International Multidisciplinary Congress of Eurasia, Barcelona-Spain, 24-26 July.
• King AS, McLelland J. 1984. Birds their structure and function. Bailliere Tindal, London, UK.
• King AS, McLelland J. 1975. Outlines of avian anatomy. Bailliere Tindal, London, UK.
• King AS. 1957. The aerated bones of gallus domesticus. Acta Anat, 31: 220-230.
• König HE, Korbel R, Liebich HG. 2016. Avian anatomy textbook and colour atlas. 5m publishing, 2. Edition, Sheffield, UK.
• Kuru, M. 1987. Omurgalı hayvanlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, Erzurum, Turkey.
• Lök S, Yalçın H. 2007. Kaya kekliği (A. Graeca) ve sülünlerde (P. Colchicus) kanat kemikleri (ossea alae) üzerinde karşılaştırmalı makroanatomik araştırmalar. Vet Bil Derg, 21: 85-94.
• McKibben JS, Harrison GJ. 1986. Clinical anatomy with emphasis on the amazon parrot. clinical avian medicine and surgery, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, USA.
• McLelland J. 1990. A Colour atlas of avian anatomy. Wolfe Publishing Ltd, Aylesbury, UK.
• Mussa MT, Kamal MM, Mahmud MAA, Sarker BK, Jalil MA, Das SK. 2015. Evaluation of a rapid and efficient method for preparation of skeletons of rabbit and goose. Bangladesh J Vet Med, 13: 27-31. DOI: 10.3329/bjvm.v13i2.26617.
• Nomina Anatomica Avium (N.A.A.) 1993. International committe on avian anatomical nomenclature: Nomina anatomica avium , 2nd ed., World Association of Veterinary Anatomist, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
• Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E. 1977. Anatomy of the domestic birds. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany.
• Onuk B. 2008. Kazda (Anser anser domesticus) solunum sisteminin anatomisi. OMÜ, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, PhD. Thesis, Samsun, Turkey.
• Özgel Ö, Düzler A, Ümran Bozkurt E. 2002. Macroanatomical investigations on ossa cinguli membri thoracici in bald ibis. Indian Vet J, 79: 700-707.
• Rezk HM. 2015. Anatomical investigation on the appendicular skeleton of the cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis). J Exp Clin Anat, 14:5-12. DOI: 10.4103/1596-2393.158919.
• Taşbaş M, Tecirlioğlu S. 1965. Maserasyon tekniği üzerinde araştırmalar. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 12: 324-330.
• Tilki M, Saatçi M. 2013. Her yönüyle kaz yetiştiriciliği. 1. Baskı, Salmat Basım Yayıncılık, Ankara, Turkey.
• Von Den Driesch A. 1976. A Guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin I. Cambridge M.A. Harvard University, USA.
• Yaman M. 1997. Bıldırcınların, Coturnix coturnix Linnaeus, 1758 (Aves: Gall.) Evcil ve yabani alt türlerinde kanat iskeletini oluşturan humerus, radius, ulna ve manus kemiklerinin biyometrik ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması. SÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Master Thesis, Konya, Turkeu
• Yıldız H, Yıldız B, Eren G. 1998. Tavuk, yerli ördek, güvercin ve bıldırcınlarda humerus ile antebrachium kemikleri üzerine morfometrik araştırma. UÜ Vet Fak Derg, 17: 87-91.
• Zeffer A, Lindhe Norberg UM. 2003. Leg morphology and locomotion in birds: Requirements for force and speed during ankle flexion. J Exp Biol, 206: 1085-1097. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00208.