Global Trends in Trachoma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 519 - 525, 01.09.2022

Mustafa Yılmaz , Emine Kübra Dindar Demiray

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.1141391

Cited By: 1

Öz

The study's goal is to examine the scientific outputs on Trachoma that have been published globally. A descriptive bibliometric analysis study was carried out. The Web of Science Core Collection was used as a bibliographic database and VOSviewer software version 1.6.18 for Windows was used to create the required network visualization. The search was conducted by using the keywords "trachoma" or "Chlamydia trachomatis" in the title. The most extensive timeframe was used, which included the years 1970 through 2021. Other publication genres such as case reports, editorials, and letters were eliminated from the search since they were not peer-reviewed papers. The overall citation counts of each trachoma-related publication published was the study's primary outcome. The topic of the publications, the publishing journal, and the year published, the language, the place of origin, the names of the first authors, the Hirsch (H) indexes, and the number of citations analyzed were all secondary outcomes. A total of 6556 articles were detected. The number of articles has never dropped under 100 articles per year since 1985. The highest number of articles was published in 2021 (n=233). 6251 (95.348%) of the articles were published in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) journals. The University of California System was the leading affiliation on trachoma research. The USA (n=2585), England (n=910), and Canada (n=336) were the countries with the higher number of publications. The articles from the USA had the highest H indexes and the articles from England had a higher number of average citations per item. Studies on trachoma are increasing worldwide. The USA and England are the leading countries in scientific production in this regard. The USA and England are the leading countries in scientific production on this topic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliometric analysis, Vos viewer, Trachoma, Chlamydia trachomatis

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

• Ahmad T, Imran M, Ahmad K, Khan M, Baig M, Al-Rifai RH, et al. 2021. A bibliometric analysis and global trends in fascioliasis research: a neglected tropical disease. Animals, 11(12): 3385. doi: 10.3390/ani11123385.
• Alkan Çeviker S, Yılmaz M, Uyar C, Dindar Demiray EK. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of scientific research on Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Turkey. DJ Med Sci, 7(2), 97-102.
• Alshahrani S, Al Owaifeer AM. 2020. Ophthalmology research trends in Saudi Arabia: a four-decade bibliometric analysis. Cureus, 12(11): e11465. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11465.
• Dindar Demiray EK, Oğuz Mızrakçı S, Alkan S. 2021.Analysis of publications on Acinetobacter: A Scopus database search study. J Clin Med Kaz, 18(5):44-48. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11226.
• Durgun C, Alkan S, Durgun M, Dindar Demiray EK. 2022. Türkiye’den kist hidatik konusunda yapılmış yayınların analizi. BSJ Health Sci, 5 (1): 45-49. doi: 10.19127/bshealthscience.937804
• Küçük U, Alkan S, Uyar C. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of infective endocarditis. Iberoam J Med, 3(4): 350-355.
• Mızrakçı S. 2022. Rotavirus konulu yayınlara global bakış. BSJ Health Sci, 5(2): 239-244.
• Nichols JJ, Morgan PB, Jones LW, Efron N.2021. 21st century bibliometric analysis of the field of dry eye disease. Clin Exp Optom, 104(5): 639-640. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1887581.
• Öntürk H, Dindar Demiray EK, Alkan S. 2021. Network analysis of nursing publications in the COVID 19 era. J Clin Med Kaz, 18(4): 27-31.
• Özlü A. 2022. Bibliometric analysis of publications on pulmonary rehabilitation. BSJ Health Sci, 5(2): 219-225.
• Özlü C. 2021. Bibliometric evaluation based on Scopus database: a global analysis of publications on myelodysplastic syndrome and evaluation of publications from Turkey. Biotech Strateg Health Res, 5(2): 125-131. doi: 10.34084/bshr.948974.
• Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. 2004. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 82(11): 844–845.
• Shah SM, Ahmad T, Chen S, Yuting G, Liu X, Yuan Y. 2021. A bibliometric analysis of the one hundred most cited studies in psychosomatic research. Psychother Psychosom, 90(6):425-430. doi: 10.1159/000516185.
• Solomon AW, Burton MJ, Gower EW, Harding-Esch EM, Oldenburg CE, Taylor HR, et al. 2022. Trachoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 8(1): 32.
• Şahin S. 2022. Vasküler cerrahiye genel bakış. BSJ Health Science, in press. doi: 10.19127/bshealthscience.1076552.
• Tahmaz A, Oğuz Mızrakçı S, Alkan S. 2022. Research trends on Legionellosis. J Clin Med Kaz, 19(2): 29-32. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11933.
• Taylor HR, Burton MJ, Haddad D, West S, Wright H. 2014. Trachoma. Lancet, 384(9960), 2142-2152.
• URL 1. WHO. Trachoma. Accessed from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/trachoma#tab=tab_1 (accessed date: May 15, 2022).
• Yıldız, E. 2022. Türkiye’de gebelik ve anestezi konulu yayınların bibliyometrik analizi. BSJ Health Sci, 5(1), 50-55. DOI: 10.19127/bshealthscience.996582
• Yıldız Gülhan P, Kurutkan MN. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of the last 40 years of Chest Journal. Düzce Üniv Bilim Teknol Derg, 9(4): 1507-1518.
• van Eck NJ, Waltman L. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2): 523-538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
• Wright HR, Turner A, Taylor HR. 2007 Trachoma and poverty: unnecessary blindness further disadvantages the poorest people in the poorest countries. Clin Exp Optom, 90(6): 422-428.