Zygomatic Implants: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis of Science Citation Index Expanded Publications (2001-2021)

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 475 - 483, 01.07.2023

Tolgahan Kara

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.1277707

Öz

Zygomatic implants provide a valuable treatment option for rehabilitation in severely resorbed maxilla. However, none of the several scientific papers on this topic have included a detailed analysis that characterized the research outputs regarding journals, authors, citations, and institutions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of publications on zygomatic implants published between 2001 and 2021. A systematic literature survey on zygomatic implants was performed on the Web of Science core collection. A bibliometric analysis of 520 studies retrieved from the survey, was conducted using Citespace IV and VOSviewer v1.6.16. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants had the highest number of publications and citations. The country with the most contributions to zygomatic implants between 2001 and 2021 was the United States. However, Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China was the largest contributor to the literature and the most cited institution. Aparicio was the most co-cited author on zygomatic implants. The bibliometric indicators in this study demonstrated upward trends in zygomatic implants. Further bibliometric analysis will also provide important guidance to authors wishing to contribute to the expanding literature on zygomatic implants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Zygomatic implants, Dental implants, Citations, Bibliometrics

Kaynakça

• Aparicio C, and Antonio S. 2020. Zygoma anatomy-guided approach" scarf graft" for prevention of soft tissue dehiscence around zygomatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillof Implants, 35(2): e21.
• Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alández J, González‐Martín O, Albrektsson T. 2014. Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontol, 66(1): 41-58.
• Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Aparicio A, Fortes V, Muela R, Pascual A, Codesal M, Barluenga N, Manresa C, Franch M. 2010. Extrasinus zygomatic implants: three year experience from a new surgical approach for patients with pronounced buccal concavities in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dentist Related Res, 12(1): 55-61.
• Bahsi A, Tekin AM, Bahsi I. 2021. A bibliometric keyword and term analysis of the articles published in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery between 1995 and 2020. J Craniofac Surg, 32(7): 2263-2265.
• Balan I, Di Girolamo M, Lauritano D, Carinci F. 2017. Treatment of severe atrophic maxilla with zygomatic implants: a case series. Oral Implantol, 10(3): 317.
• Balel Y, Tümer MK. 2021. A bibliometric analysis of international publication trends in total temporomandibular joint replacement research (1986–2020). J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 79(7): 1458.e1-1458.e12.
• Balel Y. 2021. A bibliometric analysis of international publication trends in impacted third molar surgery research (2000–2020). British J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 59(10): 1220-1226.
• Bertoli-Barsotti L, Lando T. 2017. The h-index as an almost-exact function of some basic statistics. Scientometrics, 113(2): 1209-1228.
• Borgohain DJ, Verma MK, Nazim M, Sarkar M. 2021. Application of Bradford’s law of scattering and Leimkuhler model to information science literature. COLLNET J Scientomet Info Manag, 15(1): 197-212.
• Brånemark PI., Gröndahl K, Öhrnell LO, Nilsson P, Petruson B, Svensson B, Engstrand P, Nannmark U. 2004. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long‐term results. Scandinavian J Plastic Reconst Surg Hand Surg, 38(2): 70-85.
• Brookes BC. 1977. Theory of the Bradford law. J Documentat, 33(3): 180-209.
• Candel-Martí E, Carrillo-García C, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. 2012. Rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla with zygomatic implants. J Oral Implantol, 38(5): 653-657.
• Chaudhry K, Bali RK, Kaur A, Tiwari RV, Patnana AK. 2021. Level of evidence analysis in Journal of Maxillofacial Oral Surgery: A twelve-year bibliometric analysis of 1300 publications (2009–2020). J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 20: 364-372.
• Chen C, Paul RJ, O'Keefe B. 2001. Fitting the jigsaw of citation: Information visualization in domain analysis. J American Soc Info Sci Tech, 52(4): 315-330.
• Chrcanovic BR, Abreu MHNG. 2013. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 17(2): 81-93.
• Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. 2016. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: an updated systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 74(10): 1949-1964.
• Ferrara ED, Stella JP. 2004. Restoration of the edentulous maxilla: the case for the zygomatic implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62(11): 1418-1422.
• Freedman M, Ring M, Stassen L. 2013. Effect of alveolar bone support on zygomatic implants: a finite element analysis study. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42(5): 671-676.
• Gao K, Dou Y, Lv M, Zhu Y, Hu S, Ma P. 2021. Research hotspots and trends of microRNA in periodontology and dental implantology: a bibliometric analysis. Annals Translational Medic, 9(14): 1122.
• Goker F, Grecchi E, Del Fabbro M, Grecchi F. 2020. Clinical outcome of 302 zygomatic implants in 110 patients with a follow‐up between 6 months and 7 years. Clin Implant Dentist Related Res, 22(3): 415-423.
• Lorusso F, Conte R, Inchingolo F, Festa F, Scarano A. 2021. Survival rate of zygomatic implants for fixed oral maxillary rehabilitations: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between zygomatic and regular implants. Dentist J, 9(4): 38.
• Ma L, Gao X, Liu W. 2020. Bibliometric analysis of the top-100 cited articles on oral potentially malignant disorders to guide research topic and direction. J Dent Sci, 15(4): 479-485.
• Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P. 2004. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6–48 months follow‐up study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 15(1): 18-22.
• Maló P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes I. 2008. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study. J Prosthetic Dent, 100(5): 354-366.
• Moed HF. 2009. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunol et Therapiae Exp, 57(1): 13-18.
• Nash-Stewart CE, Kruesi LM, Del Mar CB. 2012. Does Bradford's law of scattering predict the size of the literature in cochrane reviews? J Medic Library Assoc, 100(2): 135.
• Nijakowski K, Cieślik K, Łaganowski K, Gruszczyński D, Surdacka A. 2021. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the spectrum of performed dental procedures. Int J Environ Res Pub Health, 18(7): 3421.
• Pi Urgell J, Revilla Gutiérrez V, Gay Escoda C. 2008. Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a review of 101 zygomatic implants. Medic Oral Patol Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 13(6): 363-370.
• Sharma A, Rahul G. 2013. Zygomatic implants/fixture: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol, 39(2): 215-224.
• Stella JP, Warner MR. 2000. Sinus slot technique for simplification and improved orientation of zygomaticus dental implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15(6): 889-893.
• Stiévenart M, Malevez C. 2010. Rehabilitation of totally atrophied maxilla by means of four zygomatic implants and fixed prosthesis: a 6–40-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 39(4): 358-363.
• Tarazona B, Vidal‐Infer A, Alonso‐Arroyo A. 2017. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implantology (2009–2013). Clin Oral Implants Res, 28(7): 864-870.
• van der Tas J, Dodson T, Buchbinder D, Fusetti S, Grant M, Leung YY, Roethlisberger E, Aniceto GS, Schramm A, Bradley Strong E. 2020. The global impact of covid-19 on craniomaxillofacial surgeons. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconst, 13(3): 157-167.
• Viju VGW, Ganesh V. 2013. Application of Bradford’s law of scattering to the literature of library & information science: A study of doctoral theses citations submitted to the universities of Maharashtra, India. Library Philosophy Pract, 2013: 1054.