Perceptions of Students on Distance Education and E-Learning in Dentistry Education: Challenges and Opportunities

Öz

Objective: Developing information and communication technology have led to advent of distance education term and new learning materials in training institutions; unforeseen situations like a pandemic can turn distance education into a necessity rather than an option. This study aimed to evaluate the undergraduate dentistry students’ perceptions of distance education implemented to adhere to compulsory social isolation measures. Materials and methods: In the current study, a structured e-questionnaire comprising 27 items, including a 5-point Likert scale with 10 items (Google Forms®) was administered to undergraduate dental students in Turkey. A total of 1208 complete responses were received and examined in the final statistical analyses to assess students’ perception of distance education. Results: Most students were not familiar with the term evidence-based. Many respondents (n = 723, 59.9%) noted that they were better motivated in their lessons with face-to-face education in the classroom. Cronbach’s alpha value of the distance-education perceptions scale was 0.629. Factor analysis identified five sub-dimensions. The distance-education scores of the students at the foundation university were significantly higher than those of students at the state university. Conclusion: The results of this study show that students need more training on seeking and evaluating evidence-based information online. The study found that the training institution is a factor affecting students’ perceptions of distance education for dental instruction. Institutions need to re-evaluate their available educational programs as to the effectiveness of training modalities of distance education and e-learning for professional training in dentistry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• distance education
• e-learning
• dental education
• pandemia

Diş Hekimliği Eğitiminde Öğrencilerin Uzaktan Eğitim ve E-Öğrenme Algıları: Zorluklar ve Fırsatlar

Öz

Amaç: Gelişen bilgi ve iletişim teknolojisi, eğitim kurumlarında uzaktan eğitim döneminin ve yeni öğrenme materyallerinin ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuştur; pandemi gibi öngörülemeyen durumlar, uzaktan eğitimi bir seçenekten ziyade bir zorunluluk haline getirebilir. Bu çalışma, diş hekimliği lisans öğrencilerinin zorunlu sosyal izolasyon önlemlerine uymak için uygulanan uzaktan eğitime ilişkin algılarını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki diş hekimliği lisans öğrencilerine 10 maddelik 5'li Likert ölçeği (Google Forms®) dahil 27 maddeden oluşan yapılandırılmış bir e-anket uygulanmıştır. Öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitim algısını değerlendirmek için toplam 1208 tam yanıt alındı ​​ve nihai istatistiksel analizlerde incelendi. Sonuçlar: Çoğu öğrenci kanıta dayalı bilgi hakkında bilgiye sahip değildi. Katılımcıların çoğu (n = 723, %59.9) sınıfta yüz yüze eğitimle derslerinde daha iyi motive olduklarını belirtti. Uzaktan eğitim algıları ölçeğinin Cronbach alfa değeri 0.629'dur. Faktör analizinde beş alt boyut belirlenmiştir. Vakıf üniversitesindeki öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitim puanları devlet üniversitesindeki öğrencilere göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, öğrencilerin çevrimiçi kanıta dayalı bilgileri arama ve değerlendirme konusunda daha fazla eğitime ihtiyaç duyduklarını göstermektedir. Çalışma, eğitim kurumunun öğrencilerin diş hekimliği eğitimi için uzaktan eğitim algılarını etkileyen bir faktör olduğunu bulmuştur. Kurumların, diş hekimliğinde mesleki eğitim için uzaktan eğitim ve e-öğrenme eğitim yöntemlerinin etkinliği açısından mevcut eğitim programlarını yeniden değerlendirmeleri gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• uzaktan eğitim
• diş hekimliği eğitimi
• e-öğrenme
• pandemi

Kaynakça

1. 1. Peterson D, Kaakko T, Smart E, Jorgenson M, Herzog C. Dental students attitudes regarding online education in pediatric dentistry. J Dent Child (Chic). Jan-Apr 2007;74(1):10-20.
2. 2. Rasmussen K, Belisario JM, Wark PA, et al. Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. Jun 2014;4(1):010405. doi:10.7189/jogh.04.010405
3. 3. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. Jun 2014;4(1):010406. doi:10.7189/jogh.04.010406
4. 4. Linjawi AI, Walmsley AD, Hill KB. Online discussion boards in dental education: potential and challenges. Eur J Dent Educ. Feb 2012;16(1):e3-9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00662.x
5. 5. Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Tsitrou E, Cannavina G. A blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: follow-up evaluation. J Dent Educ. Sep 2008;72(9):1048-57.
6. 6. Basak SK, Wotto M, Be´langer P. Sujit Kumar Basak, Marguerite Wotto and Paul Be´langer. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2018;15(4):191-216. doi:10.1177/2042753018785180
7. 7. Hillenburg KL, Cederberg RA, Gray SA, Hurst CL, Johnson GK, Potter BJ. E-learning and the future of dental education: opinions of administrators and information technology specialists. Eur J Dent Educ. Aug 2006;10(3):169-77. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00413.x
8. 8. Reynolds PA. Back to the Future of Dental Education: "Lock up your libraries if you like, but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind"Virginia Woolf, A Room of One's Own, 1929. Acta Stomatol Croat. Mar 2014;48(1):2-5. doi:10.15644/asc48/1/0

9. 9. Mattheos N, Stefanovic N, Apse P, et al. Potential of information technology in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. Feb 2008;12 Suppl 1:85-92. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00483.x
10. 10. Tan PL, Hay DB, Whaites E. Implementing e-learning in a radiological science course in dental education: a short-term longitudinal study. J Dent Educ. Oct 2009;73(10):1202-12.
11. 11. Souza CLE, Mattos LB, Stein AT, Rosario P, Magalhaes CR. Face-to-Face and Distance Education Modalities in the Training of Healthcare Professionals: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1557. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01557
12. 12. Oakley M, Spallek H. Social media in dental education: a call for research and action. J Dent Educ. Mar 2012;76(3):279-87.
13. 13. Carbonaro M, King S, Taylor E, Satzinger F, Snart F, Drummond J. Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course. Med Teach. Feb 2008;30(1):25-33. doi:10.1080/01421590701753450
14. 14. Khatoon B, Hill K, Walmsley AD. Mobile learning in dentistry: challenges and opportunities. Br Dent J. Aug 2019;227(4):298-304. doi:10.1038/s41415-019-0615-x
15. 15. Linjawi AI, Alfadda LS. Students' perception, attitudes, and readiness toward online learning in dental education in Saudi Arabia: a cohort study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:855-863. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S175395
16. 16. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ. Aug 15 2006;6:41. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-41
17. 17. Gormley GJ, Collins K, Boohan M, Bickle IC, Stevenson M. Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students' experiences and attitudes. Med Teach. Jan 2009;31(1):e6-12. doi:10.1080/01421590802334317
18. 18. Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. May 2018;27(5):1171-1179. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
19. 19. Lenth RV. "Russ Lenth power and sample size calculator [Computer software]. Java Applets for Power and Sample Size. Retrieved June 12, 2013." 2006.
20. 20. Seo CW, Cho AR, Park JC, Cho HY, Kim S. Dental students' learning attitudes and perceptions of YouTube as a lecture video hosting platform in a flipped classroom in Korea. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:24. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.24
21. 21. Simpson O. Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open Learn. 2013;28(2):105-119. doi:10.1080/02680513.2013.847363
22. 22. Machado RA, Bonan PRF, Perez D, Martelli JH. COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on dental education: discussing current and future perspectives. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e083. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0083
23. 23. Libby LA, Boyd LD, Perry KR, Dominick C. Assessing Student Satisfaction with Face-to-Face Synchronous Distance Education in a Dental Hygiene Program. J Dent Educ. Mar 2017;81(3):287-292.
24. 24. Gavira RL, Omoteso K. Perceptions of the Usefulness of Virtual Learning Environments in Accounting Education: A Comparative Evaluation of Undergraduate Accounting Students in Spain and England. Account Educ. 2013;22(5):445-466. doi:10.1080/09639284.2013.814476
25. 25. Cheung W, Huang W. Proposing a framework to assess Internet usage in university education: an empirical investigation from a student's perspective. Brit J Educ Technol. Mar 2005;36(2):237-253. doi:DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00455.x
26. 26. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. Mar 2006;81(3):207-212. doi:Doi 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002
27. 27. Nora A, Snyder BP. Technology and Higher Education: The Impact of E-Learning Approaches on Student Academic Achievement, Perceptions and Persistence. J Coll Stud Retent-R. May 2008;10(1):3-19. doi:10.2190/CS.10.1.b
28. 28. Gupta B, White DA, Walmsley AD. The attitudes of undergraduate students and staff to the use of electronic learning. Br Dent J. Apr 24 2004;196(8):487-92. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4811179
29. 29. Andrews KG, Demps EL. Distance education in the U.S. and Canadian undergraduate dental curriculum. J Dent Educ. Apr 2003;67(4):427-38.
30. 30. McClure R, Clink K. How Do You Know That? An Investigation of Student Research Practices in the Digital Age. Portal-Libr Acad. Jan 2009;9(1):115-132.
31. 31. Kingsley K, Galbraith GM, Herring M, Stowers E, Stewart T, Kingsley KV. Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. Bmc Medical Education. Apr 25 2011;11doi:Artn 17 10.1186/1472-6920-11-17
32. 32. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: A content analysis. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. Dec 5 2007;298(21):2482-2484. doi:DOI 10.1001/jama.298.21.2482
33. 33. Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. Nov 2010;25(11):1227-9. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1447-1
34. 34. Kind T, Genrich G, Sodhi A, Chretien KC. Social media policies at US medical schools. Med Educ Online. Sep 15 2010;15doi:10.3402/meo.v15i0.5324