In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Metformin Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria Associated with Diabetic Wounds

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to determine the in vitro antibacterial activity of metformin hydrochloride against reference strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus faecalis associated with diabetic wound infections. Methods: P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 25923, E. coli ATCC 25922, and E. faecalis ATCC 29212 were used. The antibacterial activity of metformin hydrochloride was evaluated using agar well diffusion and broth microdilution methods. Minimum bactericidal concentrations were determined by subculturing samples from wells without visible bacterial growth onto Mueller–Hinton agar. The experiments were performed in three technical replicates. Results: No measurable inhibition zone was observed for any of the tested strains in the agar well diffusion assay. The minimum inhibitory concentration was 64 mg/mL for P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. coli and 128 mg/mL for E. faecalis. The minimum bactericidal concentration was 128 mg/mL for P. aeruginosa and E. coli and greater than 128 mg/mL for S. aureus and E. faecalis. Conclusion: Metformin hydrochloride exhibited species-dependent antibacterial activity. A bactericidal endpoint was achieved for P. aeruginosa and E. coli, whereas no definitive bactericidal endpoint was reached for the Gram-positive strains within the tested concentration range. These findings demonstrate that the antibacterial activity of metformin may vary according to the evaluation method and provide preliminary data for investigating its potential in local or controlled-release systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Drug repurposing
• metformin
• minimum inhibitory concentration
• minimum bactericidal concentration
• broth microdilution
• Gram-negative microorganisms

Proje Numarası

1919B012472944

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was not required for this in vitro study.

Metforminin Diyabetik Yaralarla İlişkili Gram-Pozitif ve Gram-Negatif Bakteriler Üzerindeki İn Vitro Antibakteriyel Etkinliği

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, diyabetik yara enfeksiyonlarıyla ilişkili Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli ve Enterococcus faecalis referans suşlarına karşı metformin hidroklorürün in vitro antibakteriyel aktivitesinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmada P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 25923, E. coli ATCC 25922 ve E. faecalis ATCC 29212 suşları kullanılmıştır. Metformin hidroklorürün antibakteriyel aktivitesi agar kuyu difüzyon ve sıvı mikrodilüsyon yöntemleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Minimum bakterisidal konsantrasyonlar, görünür bakteriyel üreme gözlenmeyen kuyucuklardan alınan örneklerin Mueller–Hinton agara pasajlanmasıyla belirlenmiştir. Deneyler üç teknik tekrarlı olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular: Agar kuyu difüzyon deneyinde test edilen suşların hiçbirinde ölçülebilir bir inhibisyon zonu gözlenmemiştir. Minimum inhibitör konsantrasyon P. aeruginosa, S. aureus ve E. coli için 64 mg/mL, E. faecalis için ise 128 mg/mL olarak belirlenmiştir. Minimum bakterisidal konsantrasyon P. aeruginosa ve E. coli için 128 mg/mL, S. aureus ve E. faecalis için ise 128 mg/mL’den yüksek bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Metformin hidroklorür, türe bağlı antibakteriyel aktivite göstermiştir. P. aeruginosa ve E. coli için bakterisidal sonlanım noktasına ulaşılırken, test edilen konsantrasyon aralığında Gram-pozitif suşlar için kesin bir bakterisidal sonlanım noktası belirlenememiştir. Bu bulgular, metforminin antibakteriyel aktivitesinin kullanılan değerlendirme yöntemine göre değişebileceğini göstermekte ve lokal veya kontrollü salım sistemlerindeki potansiyelinin araştırılmasına yönelik ön veriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İlacın yeniden konumlandırılması
• metformin
• minimum inhibitör konsantrasyon
• minimum bakterisidal konsantrasyon
• sıvı mikrodilüsyon
• Gram-negatif mikroorganizmalar

Proje Numarası

1919B012472944

Etik Beyan

Bu in vitro çalışma için etik kurul onayı gerekli değildi.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet. Sep 28 2024;404(10459):1199-1226. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01867-1
2. 2. Martinez JL. General principles of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Drug Discov Today Technol. Mar 2014;11:33-9. doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2014.02.001
3. 3. Miró-Canturri A, Ayerbe-Algaba R, Smani Y. Drug Repurposing for the Treatment of Bacterial and Fungal Infections. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:41. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00041
4. 4. Ding D, Wang B, Zhang X, et al. The spread of antibiotic resistance to humans and potential protection strategies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. Apr 1 2023;254:114734. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114734
5. 5. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. Jun 15 2017;376(24):2367-2375. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1615439
6. 6. Okonkwo UA, DiPietro LA. Diabetes and Wound Angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. Jul 3 2017;18(7)doi:10.3390/ijms18071419
7. 7. Spampinato SF, Caruso GI, De Pasquale R, Sortino MA, Merlo S. The Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing in Diabetes: Looking among Old Drugs. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). Apr 1 2020;13(4)doi:10.3390/ph13040060
8. 8. Macdonald KE, Boeckh S, Stacey HJ, Jones JD. The microbiology of diabetic foot infections: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. Aug 9 2021;21(1):770. doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06516-7

9. 9. Triggle CR, Mohammed I, Bshesh K, et al. Metformin: Is it a drug for all reasons and diseases? Metabolism. Aug 2022;133:155223. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155223
10. 10. Masadeh MM, Alzoubi KH, Masadeh MM, Aburashed ZO. Metformin as a Potential Adjuvant Antimicrobial Agent Against Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Clin Pharmacol. 2021;13:83-90. doi:10.2147/cpaa.S297903
11. 11. Guo T, Sun X, Yang J, et al. Metformin reverse minocycline to inhibit minocycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by destroy the outer membrane and enhance membrane potential in vitro. BMC Microbiol. Sep 12 2022;22(1):215. doi:10.1186/s12866-022-02629-4
12. 12. Marcos Carbajal P, Allca Muñoz C, Urbano-Niño Á, Granara AA. Exploración de la actividad antibacteriana de Metformina frente a Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus y Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bionatura. 11/15 2020;5:1335-1339. doi:10.21931/RB/2020.05.04.9
13. 13. Özcan Ateş G, Gökalp RA. In vitro antibacterial activity of pineapple peel extracts and chemical composition of dimethyl sulfoxide extract. Ananas kabuğu ekstraktlarının in vitro antibakteriyal aktivitesi ve dimetil sülfoksit ekstraktının kimyasal kompozisyonu. Anatolian Journal of Botany. July 2026;10:136-143. doi:10.30616/ajb.1928359
14. 14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. 12th ed. CLSI standard M07. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2024.
15. 15. Maisonneuve E, Chevrier J, Dubus M, et al. Infection of Human Dental Pulp Stromal Cells by Streptococcus mutans: Shedding Light on Bacteria Pathogenicity and Pulp Inflammation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:785. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00785
16. 16. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J Pharm Anal. Apr 2016;6(2):71-79. doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005
17. 17. He X, Jin S, Fan W, Fan B. Synergistic In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Triton X-100 and Metformin against Enterococcus faecalis in Normal and High-Glucose Conditions. Microorganisms. Jan 7 2022;10(1)doi:10.3390/microorganisms10010124
18. 18. Hossain S, Rafi RH, Ripa FA, et al. Modulating the antibacterial effect of the existing antibiotics along with repurposing drug metformin. Arch Microbiol. Mar 23 2024;206(4):190. doi:10.1007/s00203-024-03917-5
19. 19. Liu Y, Jia Y, Yang K, et al. Metformin Restores Tetracyclines Susceptibility against Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Adv Sci (Weinh). Jun 2020;7(12):1902227. doi:10.1002/advs.201902227
20. 20. Tombulturk FK, Soydas T, Kanigur-Sultuybek G. Topical metformin accelerates wound healing by promoting collagen synthesis and inhibiting apoptosis in a diabetic wound model. Int Wound J. Jan 2024;21(1):e14345. doi:10.1111/iwj.14345
21. 21. Soydas T, Sayitoglu M, Sarac EY, et al. Metformin reverses the effects of high glucose on human dermal fibroblasts of aged skin via downregulating RELA/p65 expression. J Physiol Biochem. Aug 2021;77(3):443-450. doi:10.1007/s13105-021-00823-y
22. 22. Leng T, Wang Y, Cheng W, Wang W, Qu X, Lei B. Bioactive anti-inflammatory antibacterial metformin-contained hydrogel dressing accelerating wound healing. Biomater Adv. Apr 2022;135:212737. doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212737
23. 23. Liang Y, Li M, Yang Y, Qiao L, Xu H, Guo B. pH/Glucose Dual Responsive Metformin Release Hydrogel Dressings with Adhesion and Self-Healing via Dual-Dynamic Bonding for Athletic Diabetic Foot Wound Healing. ACS Nano. Feb 22 2022;16(2):3194-3207. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c11040
24. 24. Górska A, Kurek M, Migdał A, et al. Development and characterization of metformin hydrochloride hydrogels as potential wound dressings for diabetic foot ulcers. Int J Pharm. Mar 10 2026;692:126638. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2026.126638