A Critical Reexamination of International Humanitarianism: Power, Ethics, and Critical Human Security across Africa, Asia, and Europe

Öz

This study offers a critical reexamination of international humanitarianism as both a mechanism of power and an ethical project within international relations, situated at the intersection of Critical Human Security (CHS), Critical Security Studies (CSS), and global justice. While humanitarianism presents itself as neutral and morally universal, the paper interrogates its persistent entanglement with geopolitical power, militarization, donor agendas, and strategic interests. Drawing on historical and contemporary cases across Africa, Asia, and Europe, the analysis explores the tension between humanitarian ethical commitments and the political and operational realities of international intervention. The study argues that international humanitarianism functions simultaneously as a tool of global power and as an ethical ideology, challenging conventional assumptions of neutrality, impartiality, and moral exceptionalism. By foregrounding CHS principles—freedom from fear, want, and indignity—and integrating global justice concerns such as equity, accountability, and the redress of structural inequalities, the paper advances a reframing of humanitarian action as both ethically rigorous and politically responsible. It advocates for interventions that prioritize local agency, ethical accountability, and human security outcomes, while critically examining how power relations, climate change, wars, protracted conflicts, and structural inequalities shape humanitarian practices across diverse contexts. The analysis emphasizes the moral and operational responsibilities of states, NGOs, and international institutions, underscoring the inseparability of power, ethics, and human security in contemporary international humanitarianism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Critical security studies
• Global justice
• Geopolitics
• Climate-induced crises
• Humanitarian governance
• Civilian protection

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because of there was no study on animals or humans.

Kaynakça

1. Anzellini, V. (2022). Global food insecurity is on the rise, so is internal displacement: What is the relationship? Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). https://www.internal-displacement.org/expert-analysis/global-food-insecurity-is-on-the-rise-so-is-internal-displacement-what-is-the/ (accessed on 12 December 2025).
2. Barnett, M. (2005). Humanitarianism transformed. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050401
3. Benelli, P., Donini, A., & Nilan, N. (2012). Afghanistan: Humanitarianism in uncertain times. Feinstein International Center, Tufts University. https://library.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/afghan-uncertain-times.pdf (accessed on 01 December 2025).
4. Donini, A. (2010). Humanitarianism in the 21st century. Humanitaire. http://journals.openedition.org/humanitaire/771 (accessed on 10 November 2025).
5. Hadžić, F. (2020a). Bosnia between the Dayton's peace straightjacket, development, and power centers' moral obligation; Solicitation to Biden. Small Wars Journal. https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/bosnia-between-daytons-peace-straightjacket-development-and-power-centers-moral-obligation (accessed on 09 December 2025).
6. Hadžić, F. (2020b). The impact of climate change on human security: wars and terrorism. Panoply Journal, 1, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.71166/rx19gq09
7. Hadžić, F. (2021). Critical security approach to climate change with an emphasis on marginalized global inequalities. In Current Studies in Educational Disciplines (Chapter 1). International Society for Research in Education and Science (ISRES). https://www.isres.org/critical-security-approach-to-climate-change-with-an-emphasis-on-marginalized-global-inequalities-236-s.html (accessed on 02 December 2025).
8. Hadžić, F. (2022a). Sociopolitics, psychology, and genocracy of global nationalism and neo-racism; Peace and conflict philosophy. Universal Journal of History and Culture, 4(2), 158–193. https://doi.org/10.52613/ujhc.1116521

9. Hadžić, F. (2022b). Space and place of Jerusalem; Sociology of religion and inter-cultural sociopolitical peace and conflict. Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 22(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.31456/beytulmakdis.1036835
10. Hadžić, F. (2023a). Governing the international wars: Theory, legislation, human rights, critical human security, and ethics. Equinox: Journal of Economics, Business & Political Studies, 10(2), 160–193. https://doi.org/10.48064/equinox.1119677
11. Hadžić, F. (2023b). Perspectives of the strategic alliance of science and theology and non-violent resistance to global challenges, antagonism, and human (in)security. Strategic Public Management Journal, 9(16), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.1210338
12. Hadžić, F. (2024a). Climate justice or climate injustice on the planet Earth: Social, geopolitical, legal, security, visual, and moral dimensions. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(8), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i84348
13. Hadžić, F. (2024b). Power of Global North vs. Global South; Environmental and Climate Change Policies of Inclusion, Inequalities, and Fragility. Humanities Today Proceedings, 3(1), 27–47. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/htprjr/43.html
14. Hardy, A., Manton, J., Lafferty, E., & Blanchet, K. (2016). The evolution of humanitarianism throughout historical conflict. Centre for History in Public Health (CHiPH). https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-history-public-health/news/2017-2 (accessed on 17 November 2025).
15. Hilhorst, D. (2018). Classical humanitarianism and resilience humanitarianism: Making sense of two brands of humanitarian action. International Journal of Humanitarian Action, 3(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0043-6
16. Ilunga, Y. (2020). Humanitarianism and security: Trouble and hope at the heart of Africa (Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice). Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Krstić, P., & Radovanović, B. (2023). Humanitarizam vs. humanizam. Prolegomena, 22(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.26362/20230203
18. Malkki, L. (2015). The need to help: The domestic arts of international humanitarianism. Duke University Press.
19. Sakhi, N. (2021). The humanitarian and human security crises in Afghanistan. Middle East Institute. https://www.mei.edu/publications/humanitarian-and-human-security-crises-afghanistan (accessed on 17 December 2025).
20. Seabrook, J. (2014, February 3). The doctrine of ‘humanitarianism’ is not as benign as you might think. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/03/humanitarianism-political-ideology-intervention (accessed on 25 September 2025).
21. Slim, H. (2022). Humanitarian resistance: Its ethical and operational importance. Humanitarian Practice Network Paper No. 87. https://odihpn.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Humanitarian-resistance_NP_web.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2025).
22. Sweeney, B. (2019). Global justice, humanitarianism, and the ethics of intervention. Journal of Global Ethics, 15(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1627341
23. UN Trust Fund for Human Security. (2017a). Human security: Bridging the gap between humanitarian assistance and sustainable development. https://www.un.org/humansecurity/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Bridging-the-gap-between-humanitarian-assistance-and-sustainable-development-1.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2025).
24. UN Trust Fund for Human Security. (2017). Human security and delivering as one. https://www.un.org/humansecurity/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Human-Security-and-Delivering-as-One.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2025).
25. Upadhyaya, P. (2004). Human security, humanitarian intervention, and third world concerns. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 33, 71–103.