Effects of Vitamin Supplements in a Pollen Substitute on Some Characteristics of Bee Nucleus Colonies

Öz

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of vitamin supplementation in a pollen substitute on the performance of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera mellifera). Twenty nucleus colonies housed in Langstroth-Ruth hives were randomly selected and fed a basic diet consisting of corn gluten, sugar, and brewer`s yeast residuals, yielding 21.0% crude protein, 7.1% crude fat, and 2.6% crude ash. This diet was enriched with a vitamin mixture at doses of 1, 2, and 3 grams. Control group I received a sugar-water syrup (1:1, w/v), while control group II received the basic diet without vitamin supplementation. The three experimental groups were given the diet with varying amounts of the vitamin mixture. Results indicated that experimental group II demonstrated colony strength comparable to experimental group I but significantly higher than the control group by 14.6-49.4%, and 34.3% higher than experimental group III (P<0.05). Queen bee egg yield increased significantly, with control group II showing a 27.5% increase, experimental group I showing 52.1% increase, experimental group II showing 67.6% increase, and experimental group III showing 28.5% increase on July 28th. Similar trends were observed on August 28th, with respective increases of 30.2%, 32.5%, 37.4%, and 14.7% compared to control group I. Additionally, honey yields for experimental group II were significantly higher by 25.8-57.9% compared to the control groups and 46.8% higher than experimental group III (P<0.05). These findings suggest that vitamin-enriched pollen substitutes positively impact colony strength, queen bee egg laying, and honey production, underscoring the potential benefits of such supplementation in beekeeping practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vitamin supplementation
• Colony strength
• Queen bee egg yield
• Honey production

Kaynakça

1. Abd El-Wahab, T. E., Ghania, A. M. M., & Zidan, E. W. (2016). Assessment a new pollen supplement diet for honey bee colonies and their effects on some biological activities. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 12(1), 55-62.
2. Akyol, E., Yeninar, H., Sahinler, N., & Guler, A. (2006). The effects of additive feeding and feed additives before wintering on honey bee colony performances, wintering abilities and survival rates at the East Mediterranean region. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(4), 589–592. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.589.592
3. AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC.
4. Chhuneja, P. K., Brar, H. S., & Goyal, N. P. (1993). Studies on pollen substitute fed as moist-patty to Apis mellifera L, Colonies, 2. Effect on Colony Development. Indian Bee Journal, 55 (3-4),17- 25.
5. Crailsheim, K., Schneider, L. H. W., Hrassnigg, N., Bühlmann, G., Brosch, U., Gmeinbauer, R., & Schoffmann, B. (1992). Pollen consumption and utilization in worker honey bees (Apis mellifera carnica): dependence on individual age and function. Journal of Insect Physiology, 38(6), 409–419. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(92) 90117-V
6. Delaplane, K. S., van der Steen, J., & Guzman, E. (2013). Standard methods for estimating strength parameters of Apis mellifera colonies. In V. Dietemann, J. D. Ellis & P. Neumann (Eds), The COLOSS BEEBOOK, Volume I: standard methods for Apis mellifera research. Journal of Apicultural.Research, 52(1). https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.03
7. Ghosh, S., Jeon, H., & Jung, C. (2020). Foraging behaviour and preference of pollen sources by honey bee (Apis mellifera) relative to protein contents. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 44, 1-7.
8. Jeffree, E. P. (1951). A photographic presentation of estimated numbers of honeybees on combs in 14 x 8 1/2 inch frames. Bee World, 32(12), 89-91. DOI: 10.1080/0005772X.1951.11094703

9. Klein, S., Pasquaretta, C., He, X.J., Perry, C., Søvik, E., Devaud, J. M., Barron, A. B., & Lihoreau, M. (2019). Honey bee increase their foraging performance and frequency of pollen trips through experience. Scientific report, 9(1), 6778. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-019-42677
10. Kumar, J., Srivastava, S., & Kashyap, N. P. (1995). Effect of strength of worker bees on honey production in Apis mellifera colonies. Indian Bee Journal, 57,174-176.
11. Mongolian Foundation of Science and Technology, (2019). Producing eco-clean products by introducing advanced technology of beekeeping (201900166). http://data.stf.gov.mn/Project/ProjectViewPublic.aspx?id=106780
12. Noordyke, E. R., & Ellis, J. D. (2021). Reviewing the efficacy of pollen substitutes as a management tool for improving the health and productivity of western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 772897.
13. Ochirbat, G., & Otgonbileg, K. (2009). Mongolian beekeeping in 50 years. Ulaanbaatar.
14. Paray, B. A., Kumari, I., Hajam, Y., A., Sharma, B., Kumar, R., Albeshr, M. F., Farah, M. A., & Khan, J. M. (2021).Honeybee nutrition and pollen substitutes: A review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(1), 1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.053
15. Ricigliano, V. A., Williams, S. T., & Oliver, O. (2022). Effects of different artificial diets on commercial honey bee colony performance, health biomarkers, and gut microbiota. BMC Veterinary Research, 18(1),52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03151-5
16. Rortais, A., Arnold, G., Halm, M. P., & Touffet-Briens, F. (2005). Modes of honeybees’ exposure to systemic insecticides: estimated amounts of contaminated pollen and nectar consumed by different categories of bees. Apidologie, 36(1), 71-83.
17. Sihag, R. C., & Gupta, M. (2011). Development of an artificial pollen substitute/supplement diet to help tide the colonies of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) over the dearth season.Journal of Apicultural Science, 55(2), 15-28.
18. Tsevegmid, K. (2016). The Honey Bee Pathosphere of Mongolia: European Viruses in Central Asia. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0151164. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151164