Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Raw Flower-Honey from Erzurum Highland

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 57 - 61, 31.12.2021

Serap Kılıç Altun Mehmet Emin Aydemir

Öz

In this study, the physical and chemical properties of the highland flower raw honey produced in different locations of Erzurum province were investigated. In 2019, 12 highland flower raw honeys sold during the honey harvest season were purchased from local vendors. Moisture, color, HMF, proline, acidity, pH, conductivity, diastase number, invertase activity, C13, C13 protein-honey, C4 analysis and sugar components were analyzed in honey. It has been evaluated whether the research findings are in compliance with the Turkish Food Codex Honey Communiqué and whether they are similar to the findings of previous studies The average values of the honey samples examined in this study respectively are; moisture is 15.8%, color is 41 mm pfund, HMF content is 4.1 mg/kg, proline amount is 661.2 mg/kg, acidity value is 20.4 meq/kg, pH value is 3.5, conductivity is 0.23 mS/cm, diastase number was determined as 17.8 DN and invertase activity as 189.9 U/kg. The sugar ratios in honey samples were respectively average fructose 34.6%, glucose 27.7%, sucrose 0.5%, turanose 2.6%, maltose 2.8%, isomaltose 2.9%, erlose 0.3%, fructose+glucose 62.3%, fructose/glucose 1.24, glucose/water 1.6 and trehalose, meritose, maltotriose were not detected. The difference between the protein and crude honey delta C13 values was found to be -0.29% and C13 value -29% and the C4 sugar ratio was 1.8%. As a result, it has been seen that the multifloral highland flower raw honey produced and sold in Erzurum region has high biological activity values and is in accordance with the Honey Communiqué.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diastase, HMF, Invertase, Proline, Raw honey

Kaynakça

• Albu, A., Radu-Rusu, C. G., Pop, I. M., Frunza, G., & Nacu, G. (2021). Quality assessment of raw honey issued from eastern Romania. Agriculture, 11(3),.247. https://doi.org 10.3390/agriculture11030247
• Al‐Sherif, A. A., Mazeed, A. M., Ewis, M. A., Nafea, E. A., Hagag, E. S. E., & Kamel, A. A. (2017). Activity of salivary glands in secreting honey‐elaborating enzymes in two subspecies of honeybee (Apis mellifera L). Physiological Entomology, 42(4), 397-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12213
• Amor, D. M., (1978). Composition, properties and uses of honey- a literature survey. The British Food Manufacturing Industries Research Association, Leatherhead, UK., Scientific and Technical Surveys No. 108, 84.
• AOAC, (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, 998.12: C-4 plant sugars in honey. Internal standard stable carbon isotope ratio method.
• Batu, A., Küçük, E., & Çimen, M. (2013). Doğu Anadolu ve Doğu Karadeniz Bölgeleri çiçek ballarının fizikokimyasal ve biyokimyasal değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Gıda Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 8(1), 52-62.
• Bogdanov, S. (2009). Harmonized methods of the International Honey Commission. http://www.ihc–platform.net/ihcmethods2009.pdf.
• Bogdanov, S., & Martin, P. (2002). Honey authenticity: A review. Mitteilungen aus dem Gebiete der Lebensmitteluntersuchung und Hygiene, 93, 232–254.
• Bogdanov, S., Jurendic, T., Sieber, R., & Gallmann, P. (2008). Honey for nutrition and health: A review. Journal of the American College of.Nutrition,.27,.677–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2008.10719745
• Bogdanov, S., Martin, P., & Lullmann, C. (2002). Harmonised methods of the international honey commission. Swiss Bee Research Centre, FAM, Liebefeld, 5, 1-62.
• Burucu, V. (2021). Ürün Raporu Arıcılık 2021. Tarımsal Ekonomi ve Politika Geliştirme Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü (TEPGE), 30, 1-37.
• Çiftci, E. (2014). Konya yöresel yayla balı ile püren balının kalite kriterleri yönünden karşılaştırılması. (Tez No. 410893) (Yüksek Lisans Tezi; Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya).
• Çiftçi, M., & Parlat, S. S. (2018). Konya Bölgesindeki marketlerde satılan farklı ticari çiçek ballarının bazı kimyasal özelliklerinin Türk Gıda Kodeksi-Bal Tebliğine uygunluğunun Araştırılması. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 32(1),.38-42. https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2018.61
• Doner, L. W. (2003). Honey. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2, 3125-3130. London: Academic Press. 10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00600-3
• DIN Norm, (2002). DIN Norm 10754 Untersuchung von Honig; Bestimmung des Prolingehaltes von Honig.
• Erdoğan, Y., Dodoloğlu, A., & Zengin, H. (2004). Farklı çevre koşullarının bal kalitesi üzerine etkileri/Effect of different environmental conditions on honey quality. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 157-162.
• Erez, M., Karabacak, O., Kayci, L., Fidan, M., & Kaya, Y. (2015). Characterization of multifloral honeys of pervari region with different properties. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.20031
• Gökmen, V. (2007). Analysis of HMF By HPLC. Cost Action 927 Training School. Building Skills on the Analysis of Thermal Process Contaminants in Foods, Ankara.
• Herbert, E. W. (1992). Honey bee nutrition. In Graham, J.M. (Ed). The hive and the honey bee, (pp.197-233). Datant & Sons, Hamilton.
• Kolayli, S., Yildiz, O., Sahin, H., & Aliyazicioglu, R. (2013). Biochemistry and physicochemical properties of honey. In L.Boukraa (Ed.), Honey in Traditional and Modern Medicine (pp 21-35.). CRC Press.
• Korkmaz, S. D., & Küplülü, Ö. (2017). Effects of storage temperature on HMF and diastase activity of strained honeys. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 64(4), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002811
• Lazaridou, A., Biliaderis, C. G., Bacandritsos, N., & Sabatini, A. G. (2004). Composition, thermal and rheological behaviour of selected Greek honeys. Journal of Food Engineering, 64, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.007
• Machado De-Melo, A. A., Almeida-Muradian, L. B. D., Sancho, M. T., & Pascual-Maté, A. (2018). Composition and properties of Apis mellifera honey: A review. Journal of Apicultural Research, 57(1),.5-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1338444
• Özgüven, M., Demircan, E., & Özçelik, B. (2020). Çeşitli yörelerimizde üretilen çiçek ballarının fizikokimyasal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi ve Türk Gıda Kodeksi’ne uygunluğunun değerlendirilmesi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (20), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.758399
• Ruiz-Matute, A. I., Brokl, M., Soria, A. C., Sanz, M. L., & Martinez-Castro, I. (2010). Gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric characterisation of tri- and tetrasaccharides in honey. Food Chemistry,.120,.637–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.10.050
• Sabatini, A.G. (2007). Il miele: Origine, composizione e proprieta`. In A.G. Sabatini, L. Botolotti, & G.L. Marcazzan (Eds.), Conscere il miele (pp. 3–37). Bologna-Milano: Avenue Media.
• Şahin, H., Kolaylı, S., & Beykaya, M. (2020). Bazı ham ve ticari ballarda ayırt edici parametre olarak invertaz ve glukoz-oksidaz aktivitesinin karşılaştırılması. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 20(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.656842
• Sorkun, K., Doğan, N., Gümüş, Y., Ergün, K., Bulakeri, N., & Işık, N. (2002). Türkiye’de üretilen doğal ve yapay balların ayırt edilmesinde fiziksel, kimyasal ve mikroskobik analizleri. Mellifera, 2–4: 13–21.
• Thrasyvoulou, A., Tananaki, C., Goras, G., Karazafiris, E., Dimou, M., Liolios, V., Kanelis, D., & Gounari, S. (2018). Legislation of honey criteria and standards. Journal of Apicultural Research, 57(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1411181
• Turkish Food Codex, (2020). Turkish food codex Honey Communication (Communication No: 2020/7).
• TSE, (2002). Bal Standardı. TS 3036. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara.