Adapting the Parental Attachment Recognition Scale for Parents Nurturing Preschool Children into Turkish (Okul Öncesi Çocuğu Olan Ebeveynlerin Bağlanma Tanıma Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlaması)

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to conduct a validity and reliability study by adapting the "Parent Attachment Recognition Scale" developed by Tanaka (2020) to determine the early attachment experiences of mothers with preschool-aged children. The study group consisted of 565 parents, including 321 mothers and 244 fathers with preschool-aged children. The data for the study were collected through the "Personal Information Form" and the "Parent Attachment Recognition Scale" developed by Tanaka (2020). The scale comprises three subscales: parent-child communication, emotional attachment and parent impressions with a total of 27 items. Content and construct validity were examined in the validity study of the scale, while in the reliability study, analyses related to internal consistency were conducted. Expert opinions were utilized for the scale's content validity and both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis techniques were employed for construct validity. The analyses indicated that the scale maintains its three-subscale structure as in the original form and the fit indices were acceptable. As a result of the analyses conducted for the scale's reliability, for the "Parent-Child Communication" subscale, the Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient was calculated as 0.966 for mothers and 0.960 for fathers. For the "Emotional Attachment" subscale, the Alpha reliability coefficient was calculated as 0.960 for mothers and 0.968 for fathers. For the "Parental Impressions" subscale, the Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient was calculated as 0.875 for mothers and 0.933 for fathers. The scale's overall Cronbach's Alpha value was calculated as (α)=0.979 for mothers and (α)=0.972 for fathers. In conclusion, the scale was determined to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Keywords

• Attachment
• parent
• preschool period
• validity
• reliability

References

1. Ahmadova, P. (2019). Annenin bağlanma özellikleri ile ebeveyn tutumları ve çocukların ruhsal, davranışsal durumu arasındaki ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi.
2. Akgül, A., & Çevik, Ç. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri. Ankara: Emek Ofset Baskı.
3. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss sadness and depression (Vol. 3). New York: Basic.
4. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol 1. Attachment (Rev. ed.). New York Basic.
5. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.
6. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (28. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

9. Çarkçı, J. (2020). Sosyal bilimlerde ölçek geliştirme klavuzu. İstanbul: Çizgi Kitabevi.
10. Collins, F. L., & Ford, M. (2010). Responding to the needs of others: The caregiving behavioral system in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 235–244. doi:10.1177/0265407509360907
11. Collins, F. L., Ford, M., Guichard, A., Kane, H., & Feeney, B. C. (2009). Responding to need in intimate relationships: Social support and caregiving processes in couples. In M. Mikulincer & P. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior (pp. 367–389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Cozolino, L. (2014). The Neuroscience of human relationships: attachment and the developing social brain. WW Norton & Company, New York.
13. Crugnola, C. R., Gazzott , S., Spinelli, M., Lerardi, E., Caprin, C., & Albizzat, A. (2013). Maternal attachment influences mother–infant styles of regulation and play with objects at nine months. Attach Hum Dev, 15(2), 107-131.
14. Cummings, E. M., Braungart-Rieker, J. M., Rocher-Schudlich, D. T. (2003). Emotion and personality development in childhood. R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (pp.211-239). John Wiley & Sons Inc, New Jersey.
15. Diehl M., Elnick A. B., Bourbeau L.S., Labouvie-Vief G. (1998). Adult attachment styles: Their relations to family context and personality. J Pers Soc Psychol, 74, 1656- 1669.
16. Erkuş, A. (2003). Psikometri üzerine yazılar. (1. Baskı). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları
17. Feeney, B., Collins, N., Van Vleet, M., & Tomlinson, J. (2013). Motivations for providing a secure base: Links with attachment orientation and secure base support behavior. Attachment and Human Development, 15(3), 261–280. doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.782654
18. Fraley, R. C, Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2),350-365.
19. George, C., & Solomon, J. (1999). Attachment and caregiving: The caregiving behavioral system. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 649–670). New York, NY: Guilford.
20. George, C., & Solomon, J. (2008). The caregiving system: A behavioral systems approach to parenting. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.). Handbook of attachment. Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 833–856). (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
21. George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985/1996). An adult attachment interview. Unpublished manuscript. CA: University of California at Berkeley.
22. Görgü, E. (2018). Okula devam eden 5-6 yaş grubu çocukların annelerinin bağlanma biçimleri, kişilik özellikleri ve çocukların bağlanma biçimleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 186-209.
23. Günaydin, G., Selçuk, E., Sümer, N., & Uysal, A. (2005). Ebeveyn ve Arkadaşlara Bağlanma Envanteri Kısa Formu’nun psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8 (16), 13-23.
24. Güner-Algan, A. & Şendil, G. (2013). The relations among parents’ and preschool children’s attachment security and child rearing attitudes. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 33 (1) , 55-68. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iupcd/issue/9438/118081
25. Jones, J. D., Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2015). Parents’ self-reported attachment styles: A review of links with parenting behaviors, emotions, and cognitions. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 19(1), 44-76. doi:10.1177/1088868314541858.
26. Karasar, N. (1995). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler ve teknikler. Ankara: Sim Matbaası.
27. Kırımer, F., Akça, E, & Sümer, N. (2014). Orta çocuklukta anneye kaygılı ve kaçınan bağlanma:Yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanteri-ıı–orta çocukluk dönemi ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 17(33), 45-57.
28. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
29. Lippe, A., Von Der Eilertsen, D. A., Hartmann, E., & Kille, K. (2010). The role of maternal attachment ın children’s attachment and cognitive executive functioning: a preliminary study. Attachment and Human Development, 12(5), 429-444.
30. Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 161–182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Main, M., Goldwyn, R., & Hesse, E. (2002). Adult attachment scoring and classification system, Version 7.2. Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Berkeley.
32. Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
33. Özdamar, K. (2011). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizleri. (8. Baskı). Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
34. Öztürk, S. (2006). Aile içi iletişimin ergenin duygusal sağlığına etkisi (Keçiören ilçesi örneği), Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
35. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable ındicator of content validity? appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
36. Scherer, K. R. (1988). Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: Areview. In Y Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds), Cognitiveperspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 89-126). Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic.
37. Selçuk, E., Günaydın, G., Sümer, N., & Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanteri-II’nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8(16), 1-11.
38. Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & DiStefano, C. (2018). The Relationship Between the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Model Misspecification in Factor Analysis Models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(5), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221
39. Sımsıkı, H. (2011). Baba katılımının ebeveyn tutumu, bağlanma stili ve çift uyumu açısından incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi .
40. Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1994). Intergenerational patterns of attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 93-120). London: Jessica Kingsley.
41. Steele, H., Steele, M. and Fonagy, P. (1996), Associations among attachment classifications of mothers, fathers, and their ınfants. Child Development, 67(2), 541-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01750.x
42. Steele, M., & Baradon, T. (2004). Clinical use of the adult attachment interview in parent–infant psychotherapy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25(4), 284–299.
43. Stern, J. A., Fraley, R. C., Jones, J. D., Gross, J. T., Shaver, P. R., & Cassidy, J. (2018). Developmental processes across the first two years of parenthood: Stability and change in adult attachment style. Developmental Psychology, 54(5), 975-988. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000481.
44. Sümer, N. (2006). “Ergenlikte Ebeveyn Tutum ve Davranışlarının Bağlanma Kaygısındaki Rolü”, 11. Ergen Günleri, Konuşma Metni, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
45. Sümer, N., & Güngör, D. (1999). Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri ölçeklerinin türk örneklemi üzerinde psikometrik değerlendirmesi ve kültürlerarası bir karşılaştırma, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(43), 71-106.
46. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
47. Tanaka, Y. (2020) The development of a parental attachment recognition scale for mothers nurturing preschool children. Public Health Nurs., 37, 310–320. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12697
48. Tavakol, M., Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 27(2), 53-55.
49. Tekindal, S. (2021). Nicel, nitel, karma yöntem araştırma desenleri ve istatislik. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
50. van IJzendoor, M. H.& Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (1997) Interganarational transmission of attachment: A move to the Contextual level. In L. Atkinson and K. J. Zucker (Eds.) Attachment and Psychcology (pp. 135-170). New York: The Guilford Press.
51. van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387–403. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.387. PMID: 7777645.
52. Verhage, M. L., Schuengel, C., Madigan, S., Fearon, R. M., Oosterman, M., Cassibba, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2016). Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 142(4), 337–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000038.
53. Williams, B., Onsman, A., and Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australas. J. Paramed. 8, 1–13.
54. Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409–428, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
55. Yurdugül, H. (2005). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 28–30 Eylül Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Denizli.