Students’ experiences in learning and using Prezi in higher education

Yıl 2019, , 928 - 946, 15.10.2019

Ahmet Berk Ustun

https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.552138

Cited By: 1

Öz

This paper documented the findings of an exploratory,
qualitative case study and investigated students’ opinions about learning Prezi
and their first experiences in using Prezi in Higher Education. A total of 13
students who were determined as eligible participants through a purposeful
selection method were recruited. They responded to 10 interview questions that
were analyzed by two researchers using content analysis. The results
demonstrate that students’ experiences in acquiring practical knowledge of
Prezi and creating Prezi presentations resulted in the identification of four
major themes including usability, usefulness, organization and drawback. The
eleven sub-themes emerged from these major themes include the following
easiness, difficulty, future use, collaboration, mobility, attractiveness,
zoomable user Interface & infinite canvas, effectiveness & efficiency,
customization, cost and language. This study shows that although the price and
limited language options of Prezi are the drawbacks, the innovative features of
Prezi convert presentations from boring and linear fashion into stimulating,
impressive and effective fashion. The learning and using process of Prezi are
straightforward for even students who have just used traditional presentation
tools such as PowerPoint. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prezi, presentation, learning/using experiences

Kaynakça

• ReferencesAkgün, Ö. E., Babur, A., & Albayrak, E. (2016). Effects of Lectures with PowerPoint or Prezi Presentations on Cognitive Load, Recall, and Conceptual Learning. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3). Anderson-Williams, R.. (2012). Mastering Prezi for Business Presentations. Birmingham: Packt Publising Ltd.Bean, J. W. (2012). Presentation Software Supporting Visual Design: Displaying Spatial Relationships with a Zooming User Interface. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2012 IEEE International, 1-6. doi: 10.1109/IPCC.2012.6408630Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Bernhardt, B.& Fischer, K. S. (2006) Presentations That Keep Your Audience Interested and Awake, The Serials Librarian, 50:3-4, 315-318Chou, P. N., Chang, C. C., & Lu, P. F. (2015). Prezi versus PowerPoint: The effects of varied digital presentation tools on students’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 91, 73-82.Conboy, C., Fletcher, S., Russell, K., & Wilson, M. (2012). An evaluation of the potential use and impact of Prezi, the zooming editor software, as a tool to facilitate learning in higher education. Innovations in Practice, 7, 31-45.Diamond, S. (2010). Prezi for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.Duffy, R. M., Guerandel, A., Casey, P., Malone, K., & Kelly, B. D. (2015). Experiences of using Prezi in psychiatry teaching. Academic Psychiatry, 39(6), 615-619.Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.Harris, D. (2011) Presentation software: Pedagogical constraints and potentials. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 10(1), 72-84.Huang, Y. M. (2017). Exploring the intention to use cloud services in collaboration contexts among Taiwan’s private vocational students. Information Development, 33(1), 29-42. Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational research, 42(1), 43-57.Lichtschlag, L. (2015). Zoomable user interfaces: Communicating on a canvas: Kommunikation auf einer Leinwand (Doctoral dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, Germany).Lina, M. F. (2018). Teaching Speaking for Professional Context Using Prezi in the Relation With Students’ Creativity. Register Journal, 11(2), 154-167.Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press Moulton, S. T., Türkay, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2017). Does a presentation’s medium affect its message? PowerPoint, Prezi, and oral presentations. PloS one, 12(7), 1-39. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Perron, B., & Stearns, A. (2010). A review of a presentation technology: Prezi. Research on Social Work Practice, 1-2. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 425e453). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ruona, W.E.A. (2005). Analyzing Qualitative Data. In Swanson, R.A, & Holton, E.F. (Eds.), Research in Organizations, Foundations and Methods of Inquiry (pp. 233-263). San Fransico: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Santiana, S., & Fatimah, A. S. (2017). Prezi, cloud-based presentation, for teaching: how is it interesting?. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 2(2), 445-456.Settle, Q., Abrams, K. M., & Baker, L. M. (2011) Using Prezi in the classroom. NACTA Journal, 55(4), 105-106.Strasser, N. (2014). Using Prezi in higher education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 95. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and applications, 5, 147-158.Virtanen, P., Myllärniemi, J., & Wallander, H. (2013). Diversifying higher education: facilitating different ways of learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(3), 201-211.