Takım Çalışmasını Öğretmek: Mühendislik Öğrencileri ile Online Teknik Yazma Dersleri

Öz

Pragmatik bir yaklaşım kullanan bu çalışma, literatür ışığında çevrimiçi sınıflarda takım öğretiminde iletişim becerilerini birleştirmeyi amaçlamış olup iletişim ve takım çalışması ilkelerinin, ABD'deki bir teknoloji enstitüsünde mühendislik ve diğer STEM alanlarında eğitim alan, etnik çeşitliliğe sahip uluslararası öğrencilerin yer aldığı çevrimiçi üçüncü yıl teknik yazma dersinde nasıl rol oynadığını açıklamaktadır. Bu çalışmada veriler, yarıyıl boyu süren teknik yazma dersi için haftalık ödevler ve dersin öğrenim çıktılarına ilişkin öğrenci değerlendirmeleri kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Bulgular, öğrencilerin haftalık yazdıkları yazılar üzerinde kısa analizler yazmaları ve haftalık geri bildirim almaları nedeniyle yazma becerilerini büyük oranda geliştirdiklerini ve retorik ilkelerini öğrendiklerini, bir ortamdan (diğer insanların yazdıklarını analiz ederek) başka bir ortama aktardıklarını ve öğrencilerden oluşan bir üretken yazarlar ekibi olarak çalışmayı öğrendiklerini gösterdi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• bilgisayar destekli öğretim
• takım dinamiği
• mühendislik öğrencileri
• teknik yazı

Teaching Teamwork: Online Technical Writing Courses with Engineering Students

Öz

Using a pragmatic approach, this case study aims to incorporate communication skills in team teaching in light of the literature, describes how communication and teamwork principles play out in online third-year technical writing courses with ethnically diverse international students and faculty from engineering and other STEM majors at an institute of technology in the USA (n = 48). The data were collected using weekly assignments for the semester-long course; and student evaluations of course outcomes. The findings showed that because students wrote weekly short analyses and received weekly feedback, they most often improved their writing skills, such as editing their writings according to American English rules, and transferred learning of rhetorical principles from one setting (analyzing other people’s writing) into another setting as they learnt to work as a team of productive writers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• computer-based learning
• team dynamics
• professional communication
• engineering students
• writing.

Kaynakça

1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. [ABET]. (n.d.). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019. http://www.abet.org/accreditation
2. Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh University Press.
3. Aizenkot, D., & Ben David, Y. (2022). An exploratory study of 21st century skills of undergraduate education students: A comparison between freshman, second, and graduation years. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(4), 1–10.
4. Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88–103.
5. Alley, M. (November 22, 2022). Why our engineering and science students struggle with writing. Writing as an Engineer or Scientist https://www.craftofscientificwriting.org/struggle.html
6. Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT Press.
7. Atasoy, A. (2021). The relationship between writing self-efficacy and writing skill: A meta-analysis study. Education and Science, 46(208), 213–236.
8. Ballinger, G. (2017). The importance of communication skills for the modern engineer. The Ohio State Engineer Magazine. https://u.osu.edu/engineermag/current-issue/the-importance-of-communication-skills-for-the-modern-engineer/

9. Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Bazylak, J., & Weiss, P. E. (2017). Online Evolution: Advantages and challenges of online course components. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.10182
11. Buch, A., & Andersen, V. (2015). Team and project work in engineering practices. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(3a), 27–46
12. Burgstahler, S. (January 30, 2017). ADA compliance for online course design. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/1/ada-compliance-for-online-course-design
13. Chadha, A. (2018). Peer interactions: Extending pedagogical deliberations into the virtual hallway. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 8(3), 1–17.
14. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
15. College Factual. (n. d.). New Jersey Institute of Technology diversity: How good is it? https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/new-jersey-institute-of-technology/student-life/diversity/
16. D’Onfro, J. (August 18, 2018). How Google has stepped up its efforts to make its own tech more accessible to the disabled. National Organization on Disability. https://www.nod.org/how-google-has-stepped-up-its-efforts-to-makes-its-own-tech-more-accessible-to-the-disabled/
17. Davis, N. L., Gough, M., & Taylor, L. L. (2019). Online teaching: Advantages, obstacles and tools for getting it right. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 19(3), 256–263.
18. De Felice, S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2023). Learning from others is good, with others is better: the role of social interaction in human acquisition of new knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1870), 20210357.
19. Deveci, T., & Bedirhanoğlu, İ. (2022). University students’ positive and negative perceptions of lifelong learning: A metaphoric analysis. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 39(1), 31–48.
20. Dominguez, C., Cruz, G., & Cerveira, A. (2023). Using socially relevant projects to develop engineering students’ project management, critical thinking, teamwork, and empathy skills: The UTAD-REFOOD experience. In Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. 3rd International Conference, TECH-EDU 2022 Selected Papers (pp. 294–315). Springer Nature.
21. Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Taylor & Francis.
22. Fraser, S. & Deane, E. (1977). Why open learning? Australian Universities Review, 40(1), 25–31.
23. Fujishin, R. (2013). Creating effective groups: The art of small group communication (3rd ed.). Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
24. Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1252.
25. Goettsch, K. L. (2016). Working with global virtual teams: A case study reality check on intercultural communication best practices. Global Advances in Business and Communications Conference & Journal, 5(1). http://commons.emich.edu/gabc/vol5/iss1/3/
26. Greene, H. & Crespi, C. (2012). The value of student created videos in the college classroom – an exploratory study in marketing and accounting. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(1), 273–283.
27. Griffin, J. & Minter, D. (2013). The rise of the online writing classroom: Reflecting on the material conditions of college composition teaching. College Composition and Communication, 65(1), 140–161.
28. Harris, H. S. & Greer, M. (2016). Over, under, or through: Design strategies to supplement the LMS and enhance interaction in online writing courses. Communication Design Quarterly, 4(4), 46–54.
29. Idiong, S. P. (2023). John Dewey’s pragmatic education: A veritable tool for nation building in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Evaluation (IJEE), 9(1), 21–30.
30. Jenkins, J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education in the 21st century. MIT Press.
31. Johns, A. (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Jones, A. (2017). Simple organization strategies. Carson-Newman University Library. https://cn.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=20306784
33. Jones, S. & Fox, S. (January 28, 2009). Generations online in 2009. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2009/01/28/generations-online-in-2009/
34. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2001). The discipline of teams: A mindbook-workbook for delivering small group performance. John Wiley & Sons.
35. Kimble, C. (2011). Building effective virtual teams: How to overcome the problems of trust and identity in virtual teams. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 30(2), 6–15.
36. Kmiec, D., & Longo, B. (2017). The IEEE guide to writing in the engineering and technical fields. John Wiley & Sons.
37. Kuo, Y. Y., & Fitzpatrick, B. J. (2022). Instructional design guidelines for advancing self-sustaining online higher education in the USA. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34(4), 427–454.
38. Lingard, R., & Barkataki, S. (2011). Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F1C-1–F1C-5). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6143000
39. Llopis, G. (July 10, 2012). Effective managers earn trust quickly by doing 5 things well. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/glennllopis/2012/07/10/effective-managers-earn-trust-quickly-by-doing-5-things-well/#115eb85e5631
40. López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2021). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1293–1310.
41. Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Lloret, J. (2008). Improving teamwork with university engineering students. The effect of an assessment method to prevent shirking. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 5(1), 1–11.
42. McHenry, R., & Krishnan, S. (2022). A conceptual professional practice framework for embedding employability skills development in engineering education programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(6), 1296–1314. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03043797.2022.2164255
43. McLaughlin, M.K. (November 21, 2018). The best video conferencing software of 2018. PC Magazine. https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2388678,00.asp
44. Messer, J. (September 17, 2016). The top 5 problems with distributed teams and how to solve them. InfoQ. https://www.infoq.com/articles/top5-problems-distributed
45. Mitsch, J. A. (February 6, 2017). The value of soft skills in a high-tech world. CIO. https://www.cio.com/article/3166032/it-careers/the-value-of-soft-skills-in-a-high-tech-world.html
46. Moran, K. (January 3, 2016). Millennials as digital natives: Myths and realities. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/millennials-digital-natives/
47. Morrison, D. (March 27, 2012). Strategies for effective group work in the online class. Online Learning Insights. https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2012/03/27/strategies-for-effective-group-work-in-the-online-class/
48. Ozdemir-Onder, N. (2014). Diagnosing the EAP needs of Turkish medical students: A longitudinal critical needs analysis. Ibérica, (28), 35–57.
49. Ozdemir-Onder, N. (2018). Needs analysis. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons
50. Pacansky-Brock, M., Smedshammer, M., & Vincent-Layton, K. (2019). Humanizing online teaching to equitize higher education. Current Issues in Education, 21(2 (special issue). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1905
51. Passut, J. (February 13, 2018). Technology can give all students a voice: Expert says tech has made it easier to assess learning and empower students. EdTech Magazine. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2018/02/technology-can-give-all-students-voice
52. Platt, J. R. (November 3, 2011). Career focus: Software engineering. IEEE-USA Today’s Engineer. http://www.cis.umassd.edu/~hxu/courses/cis582/CareerFocus.html
53. Putri Anzari, P., & Pratiwi, S. S. (2021). What's Missing? How Interpersonal Communication Changes during Online Learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 148–157.
54. Rabidoux, S. & Rottmann, A. (May 2, 2017). 5 tips for ADA-compliant inclusive design. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/views/2017/05/03/tips-designing-ada-compliant-online-courses
55. Rajabzadeh, A. R., Long, J., Saini, G., & Zeadin, M. (2022). Engineering student experiences of group work. Education Sciences, 12(5), 288.
56. Raza, K., Li, S., & Chua, C. (2023). A conceptual framework on imaginative education-based engineering curriculum. Science & Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00415-2
57. Reimer, M. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century engineer. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 11(1), 89–100.
58. Sarkar, N., Ford, W., & Manzo, C. (2017). Engaging digital natives through social media. Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, 15(2), 1–4.
59. Sarker, S., Ahuja, M., Sarker, S., & Kirkeby, S. (2011). The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: A social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 273–310. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280109
60. Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131–142.
61. Sheth, T. D. (2015). Communication skill: A prerequisite for engineers. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(7), 51–54.
62. Shokirova, T., Brunner, L. R., Karki, K. K., Coustere, C., & Valizadeh, N. (2022). Confronting and reimagining the orientation of international graduate students: A collaborative autoethnography approach. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 5–27.
63. Siebdrat, F., Hoegl, M., & Ernst H. (2009). How to manage virtual teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 63–68. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-to-manage-virtual-teams/
64. Smith, K. A. (1996). Cooperative learning: Making “groupwork” work. New directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(67), 71–82.
65. Smith, K. A. (2000). Strategies for developing engineering student’s teamwork and project management skills. Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1630. https://peer.asee.org/strategies-for-developing-engineering-students-teamwork-and-project-management-skills
66. Solheim, C., Cohen, B., Dikkers, A., & Longo, B. (September 22, 2010). Interdependent catalysts for transforming learning environments … and the faculty who teach in them. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/9/interdependent-catalysts-for-transforming-learning-environments--and-the-faculty-who-teach-in-them
67. Staggers, J., Garcia, S., & Nagelhout, E. (2008). Teamwork through team building: Face-to-face to online. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(4), 472–487.
68. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
69. Sweeney, A. & Weaven, S. (2005). Group learning in marketing: An exploratory qualitative study of its usefulness. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Perth, Australia.
70. Tai, Y., Ting, Y., & Tseng, T. (2018). A proposed cohesive use of online discussion board from the aspects of instructional and social interactions in engineering education. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 8(3), 33–44.
71. Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford University Press.
72. Veis, S. (August 1, 2017). Good communication skills – An engineer’s career escalator. Engineering Management Institute. https://engineeringmanagementinstitute.org/good-communication-skills-engineers/
73. Vesikivi, P., Lakkala, M., Holvikivi, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2019). Team teaching implementation in engineering education: teacher perceptions and experiences. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(4), 519–534.
74. Warnock, S. (2009). Teaching writing online: How and why. National Council of Teachers of English.
75. Watkins, M. D. (June 27, 2013). Making virtual teams work: Ten basic principles. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/06/making-virtual-teams-work-ten
76. Young, A. (2008). Structuring asynchronous discussions to incorporate learning principles in an online class: One professor’s course analysis. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 217–225.
77. Zeleňák, E. (2006). On pragmatic and non-pragmatic concept of explanation. Organon F, 13(3), 334–348.
78. Zhu, C. (2011). Online collaborative learning: Cultural differences in student satisfaction and performance. Journal for Educational Research, 3(1), 12–28.