Okul Yöneticilerinin Okula İlişkin Görüşlerinin Sosyolojik Kuramlar Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi

Öz

Toplumu anlamak için ortaya atılan sosyolojik teoriler, toplumsal kurumlardan biri olan eğitimle yakından ilgilidir. Eğitimi toplumun bir fonksiyonu olarak gören yaygın sosyolojik bakış açısına göre, bu teoriler okulları etkileme gücüne sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, okul yöneticilerinin okulun tanımı, amacı, öğretmenler ve yöneticiler ve okullarda olması ve olmaması gerekenler hakkındaki görüşlerini dört sosyolojik kuram (işlevselci, çatışmacı, yorumsamacı ve eleştirel) çerçevesinde incelemektir. Okul gelişimine doğrudan ve dolaylı etkileri olan okul yöneticilerinin okula ilişkin görüşlerinin kuramsal arka planını bilmek ve okul yöneticilerinin okula bakış açılarını açıklamak, okul yönetimi ve eğitim liderliği davranışlarının temellerini anlamamızı sağlayacaktır. Ayrıca sosyoloji ve okul yönetimi arasındaki kesişimi ortaya koyabilmek, toplumu iyileştirmek için okuldan destek almaya yönelik eylem planları geliştirebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• okul yöneticileri
• sosyolojik kuramlar
• liderlik
• toplum

AN EXAMINATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS' OPINIONS ABOUT THE SCHOOL THROUGH SOCIOLOGICAL THEORIES

Öz

Sociological theories put forward to understand society are closely related to education, which is one of the social institutions. According to the common sociological perspective, which sees education as a function of society, every theory has the power to influence schools. The aim of this study is to examine school administrators' views on the definition of school, its purpose, teachers and administrators, and what should and should not be in schools through four sociological theories: Functionalist, conflictualist, interpretivist and critical. Knowing the theoretical background of school administrators' views on the school, which have direct and indirect effects on school development, and explaining school administrators' perspectives on the school will enable us to understand the foundations of school management and educational leadership behaviors. In addition, being able to reveal the intersection between sociology and school administration can develop action plans for getting support from the school to improve society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• School administrators
• Sociological theories
• Leadership
• Society

Kaynakça

1. Apple, M.W. (2012). Eğitim ve iktidar. Kalkedon Yayınları.
2. Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language (Vol. 2). Psychology Press.
3. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. (2015). Yeniden üretim eğitim sistemine ilişkin bir teorinin ilkeleri (A. Sümer, L. Ünsaldı, & Ö. Akkaya, Trans.). Heretik Yayınevi (1970).
4. Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2012). Schooling in capitalist societies. J. Ballantine, & J. Spade (Eds.) Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 40–43). (4th ed.). Sage Publication.
5. Bruce, S. & Yearley, S. (2006). The sage dictionary of sociology. Sage publication.
6. Collins, R. (2012). Conflict theory of educational stratification. J. Ballantine, & J. Spade (Eds.) Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 44–50). (4th ed.). Sage Publication.
7. Cookson, P. & Sadovnik, A. (2002). Functionalist theories of education. D. Levinson, P.W. Cookson, & A. Sadovnik (Eds.). Education and sociology an encyclopedia (pp. 267–272). Routledge Falmer.
8. Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Chappell, K. (2008). Possibility thinking with children in England aged 3 - 7. A. Craft, T. Cremin, & P. Burnard (Eds.). Creative learning 3 - 11: And how we document it. Stoke-on-Trent (pp. 65–74). Trentham Books. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001

9. Creative Partnerships UK. (2012). Creative schools development framework. https://creativeweb.creative-partnerships.com/guidance/090921/change-school-csdf-planning-formguidance.descriptors-and-form.pdf.
10. Creative Scotland. (2013). What is creativity? www.creativescotland.com/resources/our-publications/plans-and-strategy-documents/scotlands-creative-learning-plan-2013
11. Çelik, Ö. (2023). Sosyolojik paradigmalardan örgüt kuramlarına: Liderlik kavramının dönüşümü. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.1274276
12. Deloitte (2021). Y ve Z kuşakları araştırması: Sorumluluk ve harekete geçme çağrısı-Türkiye. Dreeben, R. (2013). The contribution of schooling to the learning of norms. A. Sadovnik, P.W. Cookson, & S. F. Semel (Eds.). Exploring education: Education an iıntroduction to the foundation of education (pp. 129–146). (4th ed.). Routledge Falmer. Durkheim, E. (2016). Eğitim ve sosyoloji (P. Ergenekon, Trans.). Pinhan Yayıncılık (1956).
13. Durkheim, E. (2010). Ahlak eğitimi (O. Adanır, Trans.). Say Yayın (1934).
14. European Parliament and the Council (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF
15. Esgin, A. (2019). Temel sosyolojik teoriler ve eğitim. M.Ç. Özdemir & A.S. Arslangilay (Eds.). Eğitim sosyolojisi (pp.73–113) Pegem Akademi.
16. Freire, P. (2014). Ezilenlerin pedagojisi (D. Hattaoğlu, & E. Özbek, Trans.). Ayrıntı Yayınları (1993).
17. Giroux, H.A. (2008). Eleştirel pedagojinin vaadi (U. D. Tuna, Trans.). Kalkedon Yayınları.
18. Goodenow C (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199301)30:1<79::AID-PITS2310300113>3.0.CO;2-X
19. Greenleaf, R. K. (2003). The servant as leader. H. Beazley, J. Beggs, & L.C. Spears (Eds.). The servant leader within: A transformative path (pp. 29–74). Paulist Press.
20. Gronn, P. C. (1985). After TB Greenfield, Whither educational administration? Educational Management & Administration, 13(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114328501300109
21. Gutek, G. L. (2001). Eğitimin felsefi ve ideolojik temelleri (N. Kale, Trans.). Ütopya Yayınevi.
22. Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
23. Havik, T., &Westergård, E. (2019). Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
24. Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. (2005) The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143205051055
25. Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business School Press.
26. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede model in contex. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
27. Hurn, C. (2002). Conflict theory. D. Levinson, P. W. Cookson, & A. Sadovnik (Eds.). Education and sociology an encyclopedia (pp. 111–114). Routledge Falmer. Jackson DS (2000) The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 61–78 https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430068888
28. Karakütük, (2001). Demokratik laik eğitim: Çağdaş toplum olmanın yolu. Anı Yayıncılık.
29. Kurul, N. (2011). Eğitimde standartlaşma: İlköğretim kurumları standartlarının eleştirisi. Eleştirel Pedagoji, 16, 7-14.http://www.elestirelpedagoji.com/FileUpload/ks7397/File/elestirel_pedagoji_sayi_16.pdf#page=9
30. Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123 https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575
31. Leithwood K, Patten S, Jantzi D (2010) Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377347
32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (1994). The fifth moment. Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.). 575–586.
33. Lunenburg, F. C, & Ornstein, A. (2021). Educational administration: concepts and practices. Sage Publications.
34. McKinsey Company (2018). True gen: Generation Z and its implications for companies. .https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies
35. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2021). Nitel veri analizi. (S. Akbaba Altun & A. Ersoy, Trans.). Pegem Akademi.
36. Ministry of National Education (2023). 2021-2022 Örgün eğitim istatistikleri: Milli eğitim istatistikleri, https://www.meb. gov.tr/2021-2022-orgun-egitim-istatistikleri
37. Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Education and Training Policy Division, OECD. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4959e84b51fe761efbd7ee7ef79b529cb953f422
38. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
39. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri (3rd ed.). (M. Bütün, & S.B. Demir, Trans.). Pegem Akademi.
40. Pollin, S., & Retzlaff-Fürst, C. (2021). The school garden: A social and emotional place. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 567720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567720
41. Ritzer, G. (2012). Modern sosyoloji kuramları. (H. Hülür, Trans.). De Ki Yayınları.
42. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
43. Sadovnik, A., Cookson, P.W., & Semel, S.F. (2013). Exploring education an introduction to the foundation of education (4th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
44. Selvitopu, A., & Kavurgacı, Ş. (2019). Frankfurt okulu bağlamında eleştirel teori ve eğitim. Uluslararası Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 99–108. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/912224
45. Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 116–135 https://www.proquest.com/docview/216482505?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
46. Taş S. (2010). Yenilikçi bir eğitim anlayışı: zilsiz okul. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (22), 207–226. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sufesosbil/issue/11415/136348.
47. Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Okulu yeniden kurmak (Y. Özden, Trans.). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
48. Shepard, J.J. & Greene, R.W. (2003). Sociology and you. McGraw-Hill.
49. Shi, H. Y., Zhang, H. H., Ren, H., & Chao, H. (2016). The important of the teacher's guiding role in the teaching. International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (Vol. 18, p. 21).
50. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. J. Smith (Eds.). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage.
51. Soder, R. (2003). The good citizen and the common school. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308500110
52. Şahin İ. (2004). Postmodern çağ ve humanist eğitim. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı.
53. Tezcan, M. (2005). Sosyolojik kuramlarda eğitim. Anı Yayıncılık.
54. UNESCO (September, 2022). SDG global and thematic indicators. apiportal.uis.unesco.org/bdds
55. Üsküplü Yeniay, A.D. (2019). Eğitim sosyolojisi açısından 21. Yüzyıl becerileri: Türkiye’de çocuk üniversiteleri modeli. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul University.
56. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. Political Science & Politics, 37(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004160
57. Yıldız, M. A., & Kutlu, M. (2015). Erinlerde okula bağlanmanın yordayıcısı olarak sosyal kaygı ve depresif belirtilerin incelenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(31), 332–345. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mkusbed/ issue/19577/208881
58. Young, M. (1998). Curriculum of the future. Falmer Press.