İkinci Dil Yazmada Coğrafik Kapsamın Etkisini Anlama

Öz

Coğrafi bölgelerin karşılatırılmasını içeren çok sayıda araştırma vardır. İkinci dilde yazmayı inceleyen araştırmacılar da alanın coğrafik kapsamı hakkında çeşitli varsayımlarda bulunabilirler. Bununla beraber, önceki çalışmalar, araştırmaların ortaya koyduğu coğrafi örüntüleri ve bunları alanın durumu hakkında ne önerdiğine dair net bir resim sunamamıştır, ancak bu yönde bazı çabalar vardır (Matsuda 1997; Kapper 2002; Pelaez-Morales, 2017 ve daha yakın zamanda, Riazi, Shi ve Haggerty, 2018). Bu araştırma, 1990 ve 2012 yılları arasında yedi uygulamalı dilbilim dergisinde yayımlanan ikinci dilde yazma araştırmalarını yazarların coğrafi konumlarıyla ilgili olarak   incelemiştir. Araştırmanın amaçları şunlardır: a) alanın coğrafi çeşitliliğine dair iddiaları desteklemek veya reddetmek için görgül kanıtları ortaya koymak, b) temsil edilen, az temsil edilen veya temsil edilmeyen bölgeleri ve ülkeleri belirlemek ve c) ikinci dilde yazma araştırmalarının genellenebilirliğine dair bir tartışma başlatmak. Bu projenin özgünlüğü kapsamının genişliğinden ve diğer araştırmaların aksine, yazarların kurumsal bilgileri ve araştırmaların bağlamı gibi iki tür coğrafi veriyi incelemesinden kaynaklanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bağlamlar,coğrafi çeşitlilik

Understanding the Impact of the Geographic Scope of Second Language Writing

Öz

A large body of research across geographic regions exists and L2 writing scholars and others may make assumptions about the field’s scope. However, prior scholarship has not provided an explicit picture of geographic patterns emerging in the research and what those patterns suggest about the state of the field, although some efforts in this direction exist (Matsuda 1997; Kapper 2002; Pelaez-Morales, 2017, and more recently, Riazi, Shi and Haggerty, 2018). This research project examines patterns in the L2 writing research, as they relate to geographical locations of the field’s authors and research sites between 1990 and 2012 in seven Applied Linguistics journals to: a) find empirical evidence to support or reject the claim that field has been geographically diverse, b) identify regions and countries that have been represented, underrepresented, or unrepresented, and c) initiate a conversation about the generalizability of the L2 writing research. This project is unique in that it is comprehensive and, unlike other research, it collects two types of geographic data: authors’ institutional affiliations as well as reported research contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• contexts,geographic diversity

Kaynakça

1. Bacha, N. (2001). Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us? System, 29(3), 371-383. Casanave, C. P. (2005). Uses of narrative in L2 writing research. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 17-32). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge. Goldstein, L. (2001). For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 73-89). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Harklau, L., & Williams, G. (2010). Practicing theory in qualitative research on second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Practicing theory in second language writing (pp. 93-111). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press. Haswell, R. H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC’s recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198-223. Kapper, J. (2002). The first 10 years of the Journal of Second Language Writing: An updated retrospective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(2), 87-89. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge. Matsuda, P. K. (1997). The first five years of the JSLW: A retrospective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, iv-v. Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.). Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 15–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
 Matsuda, P. K. (2005). Historical inquiry in second language writing. In P. K. Matsuda & Silva, T. (Eds.). Second language writing research: perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 33-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Matsuda, P. K., Canagarajah, S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(2), 151-179. Matsuda, P. K. & Silva, T. (Eds.). (2005). Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. MacNealy, M. S. (1999). Strategies for empirical research in writing. Boston: Longman. Open Doors Data: Fast Facts 2013. [Online] Available:http://www.iie.org/en/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/Fast-Facts Ortega, L. (2004). L2 writing research in EFL contexts: Some challenges and opportunities for EFL researchers. Applied Linguistics Association of Korea Newsletter. Ortega, L. (2009). Studying writing across EFL contexts: Looking back and moving forward. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 232-253). Bristol, U.K: Multilingual Matters. Requested 11/6. Pelaez-Morales, C. (2017). L2 writing scholarship in JSLW: An updated report of research published between 1992 and 2015. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 9-19. Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing research: The case of text-based studies. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 91-115). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Riazi, M., Shi, L., & Haggerty, J. (2018). Analysis of the empirical research in the Journal of second language writing at its 25th year (1992-2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 41-54. Reichelt, M. (2001) A critical review of foreign language writing research on pedagogical approaches. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 578-598. Reichelt, M. (2005). English-language writing instruction in Poland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(4), 215-232. Reichelt, M. (2009). Learning content in another context: English-Language writing instruction in Germany. Issues in Writing, 18(1), 25-52. Reynolds, D. (2010). Beyond texts: A research agenda for quantitative research on second language writers and readers. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Practicing theory in second language writing (pp. 159-175). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press. Santos, T., Atkinson, D., Erickson, M., Matsuda, P. K., & Silva, T. (2000). On the future of second language writing: A colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(1), 1-20. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677. Silva, T. (2012). JSLW@20: The prequel and the inside story (with several previously unpublished bonus texts). Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 187–194. Tarnopolsky, O. (2011). Teaching English writing in Ukraine: Principles and practices. In T. Cimasko, & Reichelt, M. (Ed.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices (pp. 183-200). South Carolina: Parlor Press. Weissberg, R. (2005). Talking about writing: Cross-modality research and second language speaking/writing connections. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 93-104). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. You, X. (2004). The choice made from no choice: English writing instruction in a Chinese University. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97-110.