Öğretmenlerin Dil ve İletişim Algılarına Eleştirel bir Yaklaşım

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 40-2 Sayı: 1, 121 - 138, 10.10.2023

Martin Dewey

https://doi.org/10.52597/buje.1363321

Öz

Son yıllarda, Ortak Dil Olarak İngilizce (ODİ) ilkeleri ve araştırmaları konusunda farkındalığın arttığına ve ODİ’nin her türden eğitim ortamındaki önemine dair kapsamlı tartışmaların gerçekleştiğine tanık olmaktayız. Bununla birlikte, dil farkındalığı ve analizine yönelik yaklaşımlarda hala tek dillilik ve dil ideolojilerinin baskın olduğu da açıkça görülmektedir. Bu makale hem pedagojik bir model hem de dil yeterliliğini belirleme aracı olarak Anadil olarak konuşulan İngilizcenin algılanan rolü hakkında dil eğitiminde uzun süredir devam eden bazı varsayımları yeniden incelemektedir. Bunu yaparken, dil öğretim metodolojisinde geçerlilik kazanan ve giderek daha etkili bir fikir olan “gelişmekte olan dil” kavramı eleştirel bir şekilde ele alınmaktadır. Daha önce de tartıştığım gibi sahadaki dil öğretmenleri tarafından ODİ pedagojik ilkelerinin daha fazla benimsenmesini teşvik etmek için, dil öğretmeni eğitimi müfredatında ODİ'nin pedagojik etkisine dair eleştirel tartışmaları içeren çalışmalara yer vermelidir. Alışılmışın ötesine geçmeyi ve öğretmenlerin ODİ bakış açısını benimsemelerini, ancak eleştirel farkındalığa olanak sağlayarak mümkün kılınabilir. O nedenle bu makale öncelikle iki anahtar soruyla ilgilenmektedir: “Öğretmenlerin dil hakkında ne bilmesi gerekiyor?”; ve “Öğretmenler sınıfta kullanılan öğrenci diline nasıl tepki veriyorlar?”. Bu makalede, bu iki ana soru ele alınırken, ODİ bakış açısıyla çerçevelendirildiğinde önemli ölçüde eleştirel katılım gerektiren dil öğretmenliği eğitiminde, dil hakkındaki bilginin yaygın olarak yönlendirilme biçimini sorgulanacak ve buna alternatifler sunulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ortak Dil olarak İngilizce (ODİ), Anadil olarak Konuşulan İngilizce, yabancı dil öğretmenliği eğitimi, eleştirel katılım

Critical Engagement with Teacher Perceptions of Language and Communication

Öz

In recent years, we have seen growing awareness of ELF principles and research, with extensive discussion of the relevance of ELF in all manner of educational settings. Nevertheless, it is also apparent that approaches to language awareness and analysis continue to be underscored by monolingualism and language ideologies. This paper re-examines some long-standing assumptions in language education about the perceived role of Native Speaker English (NSE), both as a pedagogic model and as a means of determining language competence. In doing so, I critically appraise the concept of emergent language, an increasingly influential idea gaining currency in language teaching methodology. As I have argued for some time now, to promote greater uptake of ELF pedagogic principles among practising language teachers, we must engage in critical discussion of the pedagogic impact of ELF in the curriculum for language teacher education. Only by facilitating the development of critical awareness can we hope to move beyond convention and enable teachers to adopt an ELF perspective. This paper is thus primarily concerned with two key questions: what do teachers need to know about language, and how do they respond to student language in the classroom? In order to address this, I will interrogate and offer alternatives to the manner in which knowledge about language is broadly oriented in language teacher education, which, when framed from an ELF perspective, is in need of substantial critical engagement.

Anahtar Kelimeler

English as a Lingua Franca (ELF), Native Speaker English (NSE), language teacher education, critical engagement

Kaynakça

• Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge University Press.
• Bauer, L. & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (1998). Language myths. Penguin Books.
• Bayyurt, Y., & Akcan, S. (Eds.). (2015). Current perspectives on pedagogy for English as a lingua franca. De Gruyter.
• Bayyurt, Y. & Sifakis, N. (2015). Developing an ELF-aware pedagogy: Insights from a self-education programme. In P. Vettorel (Ed.), New frontiers in teaching and learning English. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Cambridge Assessment English. (2019). In TKT Teaching knowledge test Glossary. UCLES. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/22184-tkt-glossary-document.pdf
• Cogo, A. (2016). Conceptualizing ELF as a translanguaging phenomenon: Covert and overt resources in a transnational workplace. Waseda Working papers in ELF, 5, 61–77.
• Cook, G. (2010). Translation in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
• Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2015). Translanguaging and identity in educational settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 20–35.
• Dewey, M. (2014). Pedagogic Criticality and English as a Lingua Franca / Criticalidad pedagógica y el inglés como lengua franca. Atlantis, 36(2), 11–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43486658
• Dewey, M., & Pineda, I. (2020). ELF and teacher education: Attitudes and practices. ELT Journal, 74(4), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa047
• Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
• García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson and T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds). Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local. Orient Blackswan.
• Hiller, K. E. (2021). Introducing translanguaging in an EAP Course at a joint-venture university in China. RELC Journal, 52(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211014997
• Jenkins, J. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a lingua franca. Englishes in Practice, 2(3), 49–85.
• Johnson, K., & Arshaksaya, K. (2011). Strategic mediation in learning to teach: Reconceptualizing the microteaching simulation in an MA TESL methodology course. In K. Johnson, & P. Golombek (Eds.), Research on second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on professional development. (pp. 168–185). Routledge.
• Johnson, K., & Golombek, P. (Eds.). (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. Cambridge University Press.
• Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.
• Meddings, L. & Thornbury, S. (2017). Teaching unplugged: Dogme in English language teaching. Delta Publishing.
• Nassaji, H. (2016). Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4) 535–562.
• Niedzielski, N. A., & Preston, D. R. (2000). Folk linguistics (Vol. 122). Walter de Gruyter.
• Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.) (2004) Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press
• Seidlhofer, B. (2017) English as a lingua franca in the European context. In Kilpatrick, A. (Ed), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 389–407). Routledge.
• Sifakis, N. C., Lopriore, L., Dewey, M., Bayyurt, Y., Vettorel, P., Cavalheiro, L., Siqueira, D. S. P., & Kordia, S. (2018). ELF-awareness in ELT: Bringing together theory and practice. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(1), 155–207.
• Siqueira, D. S. P., & da Silva, J. S. (2016). ELF and teacher schizophrenia. In Tsantila, N. J. Mandalios & M. Ilkos (Eds.) ELF: Pedagogical and interdisciplinary perspectives. Deree-The American College of Greece.
• Thornbury. S. (1997). About language: Tasks for teachers of English. Cambridge University Press.
• Thornbury. S. (2017). About language: Tasks for teachers of English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.